SiliconDust LPF-608M LTE Filter for TV Antennas USA 2020 Standard 600/608/618MHz
Condition: New
Checking for product changes
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
$4
/ mo
Learn more
- – 4-month term
- – No impact on credit
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
30-day refund/replacement
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
In Stock.
Arrives
Thursday, Jun 26
Features
- Blocks LTE and 5G signals that interfere with TV reception
- Filters out LTE signal interference that can cause TV reception problems
- Pass band to 608MHz supporting all USA TV channels
- Attenuates 618MHz and above to block the new "600MHz" LTE band introduced in 2020
Antenna: Television, LTE
Brand: SiliconDust
Color: Silver, White
Impedance: 75 Ohm
UPC:
Manufacturer: Silicondust USA Inc
Number of Channels: 177
Number of Items: 1
Product Dimensions: 2.3 x 0.8 x 0.8 inches
Item Weight: 1.76 ounces
Manufacturer: Silicondust USA Inc
Country of Origin: China
Date First Available: December 11, 2020
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Thursday, Jun 26
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
The filter was easy to install however, since I was installing it at the TV's, I had to use a short coax cable because the diameter of the filter was too large to attach directly to the TV's limited space. I was hopeful that this device would improve my TV reception and I was very pleasantly surprised. My home was wired for cable or OTA TV reception. Unfortunately, the coax cabling is not shielded so it picks up random radio frequencies. My OTA TV reception was deteriorating, and I wasn't sure why. I have a VHF and UHF antenna up in the attic of our one story home. We live about 39 miles from most of the UVF and high VHF transmitting towers north of Indianapolis. We were getting around 40 channels but some of the ones we really liked, would come in pixilated, intermittently or not at all during the day. My most recent rescan for OTA TV channels was getting more limited, like around 20 channels My wife recently got a 5G phone and there are now phone towers transmitting 5G signals and, after doing some research, I thought that the RF used for the 5G as well and RF being transmitted by LED light and our microwave might be an issue with our OTA reception. Upon installing the filters on our TV's and rescanning for OTA stations, I was amazed that the number of channels on the TV's that had the shortest coax cable runs of around 30 feet increased to about 80 channels. Even the TV that has about a 60-foot coax run now receives over 50 channels and I am no longer losing stations during the day or getting any pixilation. In fact, I now receive some Louisville, KY TV stations which are about 90 miles away, albeit with some pixilation. I would highly recommend this device to anyone that wants to find an inexpensive way of getting more OTA channels without purchasing and experimenting with various OTA antennas, some of which are close to $200. Just an FYI, I currently have a very simple high VHF antenna with a combiner for the small flat panel antenna that I use for all other stations. the VHF antenna gets the few VHF Indianapolis channels I want since I have it pointed fairly accurately in the right direction. I also have an 8-way splitter/amplifier to increase my reception which helps a lot.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2023 by rob-d
I was having trouble with a couple of stations not coming in anymore and got this. I thought there was no way it would work and it really does. I put it on, rescaned for stations and got more channels. It has been on for months and still working. Must have for OTA watchers.
Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2025 by Josh
Seems to work. Not sure I have cell phone interference. Not any close channels in the 30s. Low power channel 36 has been coming in on my vhf only antenna in wrong direction. Some 20 miles away. No other station in that direction. Another 36 is 90 miles away. NBC. L.A. Not enough signal on a 35 at 90 miles. A 34 often comes in from Mexico at 50 miles. 33 seldom at 50 miles. 32. 31 on meter at 90 miles. Have got 30 at 90 miles.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on November 11, 2024 by Guy Campbell
I was having data corruption issues, even with a very strong signal from a remote broadcaster (about 25 miles) that was intermittent. I read some other reviews about this that seemed to solve similar problems, so I bought one try out on my HDHomeRun box. Since installing it (very easy in my case as I had plenty of room to fit it on the box) I have not had any issues with that channel. It does not seem to have reduced other stations I can get.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2025 by B. Moffet
Made a noticeable difference on reception
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2025 by Rick kING
I live about 25 miles west of Philadelphia, and have a GE Attic Antenna, 50 ft of quad shield coax, a 15db GE amp, and a three way splitter. I get about 15 digital channels from channels 2 to 35 (2 vhf low, 2 vhf high, and 11 uhf), and 97 virtual channels. At my TV, the signal strength of the various channels varies from -73 to -43 dBm, and the signal quality (or MER) from 17 to 36 db. A few of the channels have a non-zero bit error rate (BER). There are several cell towers within 1.5 miles of my house. Anyway, I tried this filter at the antenna, before the amplifier, before the TV, and without the amplifier. I also tested it with a Phillips Rabbit Ears indoor antenna. It had not effect on the signal strength, signal quality, or bit error rate of any of the channels. This includes channel 35 (located just below the 5G n71 band), which is one of my weaker stations. It may be a defective unit, or I just don't have any LTE interference.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2025 by Ricky
This unit seemed to work fine, but after only a few months the label started to discolor even though it was inside. I'm not sure if this was related to the powered antenna I had in the system (this was installed before the amplifier according to the label) or if it even affected the performance of it. It seemed to work and not impact performance negatively at all. After some changes on my end, I just omitted it entirely. My new antenna has a 4G filter built in, and given this seemed to be heading down the road of failure I left it out of the system entirely.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 1, 2024 by Andrew Kester Andrew Kester
After installing our HDHomeRun, there were a lot of local channels that were coming in pixelated or not at all. Turns out a cell tower about a half mile from our house was right in the "line of sight" to the TV transmission towers. I gave this a try and it was like night and day. Not only did every channel I was looking for come in clearly, but after a rescan I was picking up channels that I hadn't picked up at all originally. If you suspect LTE interference, give this a shot!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 22, 2024 by David Krug