Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Sunday, Jan 25
Recently Viewed
Style: Canon
Features
- Offers OS (Optical Stabilization
- Two FLD Glass Elements
- Fast Focus
Description
120-300mm F2.8 Sports DG APO HSM Art
Brand: Sigma
Focal Length Description: 120-300 millimeters
Lens Type: Telephoto
Compatible Mountings: Canon EF
Camera Lens Description: 120-300mm
Product Dimensions: 11.46 x 4.88 x 4.88 inches
Item Weight: 6.5 pounds
Item model number: 137101
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer: No
Date First Available: January 8, 2013
Manufacturer: Sigma Corporation of America
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Sunday, Jan 25
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
$30/mo*
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN Art for Sony E Lens ,Black
$14/mo*
Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens for Sony E (402965)
Top Amazon Reviews
This all started a year ago when I found myself faced with a perfect photo opportunity and only armed with a 60mm that day. I ran across two black bears busy digging out a tree stump across a creek and they were so engrossed neither noticed the group of photographers shooting away from the other side, except me!!. As I looked around, I saw almost every photographer with a long lens, 300, 400 both Canons and Nikons shooters, one was using a Nikon 200-400. Here I was with a great photo opt and I came home nothing to show for it, because I was not prepared. I have posted some of photos I took with this lens on the truetoad site, look for the gallery-wildlife-birds There are a LOT of choices in the 300mm and longer range out there and one could list half a page of various zooms that reach as far as 500mm for under $1500.00, but each of these offerings has its draw backs in performance. For one, I don’t like lens that extend and contract during zooming (pumpers as I call them), I prefer internal focusing with a constant f stop, at lest f4 and nothing more. As I laid out my requirements with my budget restraints the choices narrowed considerably so, I made my choice based on my available funds going for the most performance at a reasonable cost. After several days of reading and research, It was the new Sigma 120~300mm 2.8 Sport edition I decided on. Had I the capital (cash) I would have went for the Nikon 500mm f4, I plan on getting that lens next year. The full hands on review for this Sigma can be found on my TrueToad site. Here it is in a nut shell; Weight: This is a seven pounder, and couple that with your DSLR and your closing in on 9 pounds. So, unless you have been working out this may be around the weight that benefits from some kind of support. I am researching a harness to allow me to carry and shoot - we shall see Quality/Craftsmanship: Sigma did a wonderful job revamping this lens, the build, fit and finish is top notch and has weather sealing. This is a top quality lens, no slop, wobble, or otherwise. Image Quality: Very good, I am impressed and having the infamous Nikkor 70-200mm VRII Sigma's image sharpness is in most cases just as sharp as the Nikon's. There is some slight softness at 300mm but nothing to complain about. Focus and Optical Stabilization: The focus is fast, and accurate, with a fast or slow option. Mine does have some difficulty at times when clutter is near the subject, such as birds in trees surrounded by branches, but overall, the focus nails it, and keep in mind a lot depends on available light, and how you have YOUR camera set up. Optical Stabilization works as well as my Nikkor VRII lens, and does improve overall image quality when using slower shutter speeds. This lens has OS two modes, and when engaged makes a slight auditable click, and when viewing through the viewfinder you can see the image lock. So, yes it works and is beneficial. Price VS Performance; This is not a cheap lens, so you expect a good performing lens when you get it. SIGMA has done a great job of adding tweaks to their already great lens making it even better and more enjoyable to use. Since the next closest price for a 2.8 300mm will set you back about 2 grand more, this lens makes a lot of sense. Things you need to know and consider: Consider adding the USB dock if you buy this lens, the dock allows you to update the firmware, and make additional tweaks to a few parameters. This lens DOES NOT support Nikon Tele converters. So if you a Nikon Shooter and already have an investment in Nikon TCs, your out of luck. You will need to purchase one that works, I suggest in this case the SIGMA line as they work perfectly with this lens. Yep - another $250.00 sorry. I use both the 1.4 and 2.0 Sigma TCs and I can say the 1.4 really shines, making this lens a 420mm and very good sharpness; check out my images on the TrueToad site shot with this combination. I gave this lens 5 stars based on the quality, performance, and price when measured against the cost of other 300mm 2.8 lenses. Sure, the primes offered by Nikon or Canon do deliver slight increase in performance, but the additional cost in my opinion out weighs the benefit.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 8, 2013 by dmbTank
Style: Canon
Is it a perfect lens? I don't know but I don't think so. But if you factor in quality of imagine, the flexibility of the 120-300, and the price then I have to give it a 5 star. I have already used it on the soccer field in horrible lighting (or lack of lighting), on the softball and baseball fields at all levels. I very happy with the results right now. Are they perfect, nope. But I see there is a bit of adjustment when using a lens light this. I purchased the USB dock and already customized it to my needs. That was a BIG improvement. Does it appear to "miss" my focused spots sometimes, yep it does but to be honest I see a whole lot of personal user error right now. But I have had the same problem when using the Canon 300mm f2.8 mark I. Let me try to summarize some other points or questions: 1. Is it a beast? Yep! Weighs a ton. I do curls with it every day and I'm looking pretty buff, ok not really. Yes you will want a monopod. But lets me honest. You would want a monopod with a Canon 300mm too! Actually now that I think about it a monopod is a must for shooting sports using the 70-200! 2. I love the design! Yes it isn't a cool off white lens by Canon but I really like the look of the design. 3. Yes people are jealous when they see me walk out on the field with it. And yes my head swells a bit. Sounds a little stupid but it is true. The lens adds a bit of legitimacy to what I do. I swear people just let me walk buy at the ticket gate without even asking question. Oh, and yes they would to the same if I walked in with a Canon 300mm. 4. Not a big fan of the control rings. Yes they are stiff! Which isn't a bad thing but it isn't a good thing either. The zoom ring is the furthest away and feel backwards to me. But I have adjusted and working on different techniques to make things easier. 5. I bought this because of the 120-300mm range. I knew I wouldn't be happy with a 300mm prime. I have used one for a while and always felt limited. So far I love adjusting my focus point! I can do so much more with it. 6. Buy the USB dock. 7. Have fun with it! Understand what you are buying and run with it! Nope it isn't a prime. Get out and shot a lot with it. Ok, i'm not a writer so I'm total done with this review. ;-)
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 11, 2016 by Kindle Customer
Style: Canon
The weights listed on the Amazon pages are not accurate. On a quick read, you'll see that this lens is listed at 6.5 pounds, which is about the same as what's listed for the the Sigma 150-600 (Contemporary) that I just bought and loved--6 pounds. But neither weight is true; on my scale, this lens comes out to 8 pounds, 3 ounces while the 150-600 is just over half that. The confusion is in the Technical Details portion of the page. The 150-600 (C) shows Item Display Weight as 6 pounds; right below that is Item Weight,1930 grams. Over on the 120-300 page, the two entries are reversed: Item Display Weight is 3,390 grams and Item Weight is 6.5 pounds. The Sport version of the 150-600 shows Item Display Weight as 2,900 grams and Item Weight as 6.31 pounds. Are you confused yet? It appears to me the metric weights are correct but the pounds are not; for us metrically-challenged Americans, it's easy to just read the pounds and get it wrong. You might want to check the Sigma website. I did some quickie weighing on a little postal scale and can't swear to my own accuracy; I'm just saying the Amazon page is misleading. This is one of those lenses you really want to try in person before you mail-order it. As for the lens itself, I only tested it a little. It's very well-built, of course, and seems sharp and precise. I just don't see how anyone could reasonably hand-hold it for any length of time. I'd planned on using it for live-music performances, thinking it only weighed a little more than other lenses I've used (70-200, 100-400, 150-600). But not only is the weight a problem, the diameter and balance are issues. I'm sure this would be a great lens on a monopod or tripod, but hand-held in a crowded venue, it's just not worth the extra reach.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2016 by Frank R.