Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
FREE 30-day refund/replacement
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
In Stock.
Arrives
Wednesday, Jun 10
Recently Viewed
Style: Lens Only
Features
- 24-70mm focal length, 38.4-112mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F2.8 constant maximum aperture; F22 minimum, Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing
- 82mm filters, Closest Focusing Distance: 0.38m/1.25 ft.
- Image Stabilization : No
- Purchase this product between May 1, 2016 and July 30, 2016 and get 13 months of free damage protection from Canon. The product must be registered within 30 days of the purchase date to be eligible.
Description
Meeting the ever-increasing demands on image quality that digital photography brings, the redesigned EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM is the latest update to the acclaimed L-Series of EF optics, re-establishing a new standard for superb optics, high-end durable construction and performance in professional zoom lenses. A standard focal length zoom lens, it features a large aperture throughout its focal length. Filter size: 82 mm, Closest Focusing Distance: 1.25 feet. Maximum magnification (x) - 0.21(at 70mm).
Specs & Other Info
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Canon |
| Zoom Capability | Wide-angle to mid-range |
| Lens Classification | Zoom lens |
| Supported Camera Mount | Canon EF mount |
| Lens Description | 70 months warranty coverage |
| Physical Dimensions | 113.3 x 88.9 x 88.9 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kilograms |
| Model Number | 5175B002 |
| Continued Production | No |
| Availability Date | February 2012 |
| Manufacturing Country | Japan |
Frequently asked questions
The aperture range of the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens goes from f/2.8 to f/22. The wide f/2.8 aperture is constant throughout the zoom range, which allows for great performance in low light conditions and the possibility to achieve a shallow depth of field.
The Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens is compatible with Canon full-frame DSLRs as well as APS-C models. However, on APS-C cameras, it will have an effective focal length of approximately 38-112mm due to the crop factor.
No, the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens does not come with built-in image stabilization. Users may need to use a tripod or a camera with in-body stabilization for steady shots at slower shutter speeds.
Yes, the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens features weather sealing which makes it resistant to dust and moisture. This allows photographers to use it in various challenging weather conditions.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
🚀 Abunda's Overview
This is our summary and key points to consider based on customer reviews.
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II lens receives high praise from experienced photographers for its superb sharpness, contrast, and flare control, even though it is considered expensive. Users are impressed by the lens' performance in low light and its build quality, despite the lack of IS (Image Stabilization) and some noting that the lens is bulkier than expected. The versatility and image quality of the lens make it a favorite for many.
Pros
- 🔍 Exceptional sharpness and image quality
- 🎨 Excellent color reproduction and contrast
- 🌞 Impressive flare control, even in challenging lighting
- 🛠️ High-quality build and weather-sealed design
- 🔒 Lens locking mechanism for secure travel
- 🔄 Usable in diverse photography situations
Cons
- 💲 High price point
- ⚖️ Somewhat bulky and heavy
- 🔄 Front section extends when zooming, lacking internal zooming mechanism
- 🖼️ Visible vignetting at wide apertures
- 🔎 Lacks Image Stabilization (IS)
Should I Buy It?
If you are looking for a versatile, high-quality lens that can handle a wide range of shooting conditions and deliver outstanding images, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II is a strong contender, despite its high cost. If you can overlook the absence of IS and handle its bulkiness, it could be a terrific long-term investment for your photography needs.
Style: Lens Only
Please be forewarned. If you get this stellar lens, you may very well stop using the rest of your lenses with the exception of two lenses - the Canon 70-200 f2.8 L and the Canon 16-35 f2.8 L, if you have those. These three L lenses are what we call the famed "Canon Lens trinity". I have been a photographer (Intermediate) for the past 24 years. I have several Canon lenses in my arsenal. But this one beats them all for a few reasons: 1) The 24-70 focal range is what I need most times - travel, street photography, portraits, landscapes. 2) It is truly an all purpose/walkaround lens. 3) Carrying a camera backpack is no longer a tiring exercise only because it is just the camera and this lens with lightweight accessories. 4) This lens is incredibly sharp with a constant f2.8. There are no sweet spots, it is a sweet spot all the way through the two ends of the spectrum from 24 to 70. 5) Every picture that I took with this lens is phenomenal and I have received tons of compliments. 6) Solid build quality and very professional. You get what you pay for. 7) This is one of those products which you can just buy without any research whatsoever. Can never go wrong. 8) Works superbly with full frame cameras (I use a EOS 6D) as well as with APSC crop sensor cameras (I also have an EOS 7D) I can go on and on, with my raving. I will stop here. If you are an amateur and own a Canon DSLR, this would be your best investment. If you are a professional, I bet you already have one! Enjoy.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2023 by Vijay
Style: Lens Only
I purchased this lens in 2013 and have waited to get some really good use out of it before posting this review. I use this lens on my Canon 7D and my Canon Mark 5D Mark lll. This is the greatest lens I've ever used... challenged only by the Canon 70-200mm L IS II. It is unbelievably sharp throughout the zoom range. I've taken shots that would rival the most expensive primes. Focusing is almost instantaneous. You target it, and it focuses... . The build is solid and strong. It is not nearly as heavy though as the previous model. This EF lens features a zoom lock which prevents the barrel from zooming out while hanging from the neckstrap and also has full-time manual focusing (like most Canon lenses). The lens diameter is 82mm which is the same as my EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM so IF I wanted to use a filter, it would interchange between these two lenses. This is my workhorse lens in my Fashion businesses. I shoot mostly indoors with a Canon 5D Mark lll. This lens works perfectly on this camera. I use the f/2.8 more than any other f/stop on the lens and it gives me great indoor shots that my business requires. Coupled with the Speedlite 600EX-RT they are a team that works well together. The lens has been redesigned and the main result is improved sharpness throughout. The lens is very fast to focus and works well in all lighting circumstances. It is now more water and dust proof. It is built to last. The hood is a short wing design PROS: - Build quality - feels solid but not as heavy as it's predecessor. Zoom and focus rings are a bit snug but they both rotate smoothly. - AF performance - on the 5D Mk III it locks focus quickly. It SEEMS like it's faster than the original which I have only used one time. - Image quality - Sharp and beyond belief. This lens produces super sharp images of high resolution and produces photos as good as any prime lens. Cons: The only con to this lens is no IS. I was hoping that they were going to release an IS version of this lens but in speaking to Canon at the last Professional Photography Imaging Convention, they have no plans at that time to release this lens with IS, mainly because it would add quite a bit of weight to the lens. I won't say cost is a con. You get what you pay for and if you have chosen this lens you are now enjoying the sharpness and quality build of one of the best if not the best lens Canon offers so no conplaint on the price since anyone using this chose to purchase it at that price. I have shot people, landscape, waterscape, fashion, sunsets and sunrises and birds with this lens in RAW and JPEG. It is definitely over the top for quality photos especially on my Canon 5D Mark lll.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2016 Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2016 by AReviewer.of.online.Products
Style: Lens Only
I am a huge fan of primes: If I had infinite resources, I'd buy every L-grade prime between 35mm and 200mm! So, I do not recommend zooms just for the convenience of it. Before I decided on this lens, I have tried Sigma's 35mm and 50mm and Canon's 35mm L and 50mm L - so as you can see, I gave primes a fair chance to find a place in my photo bag. Canon's 50mm 1.2 and this lens (24-70) ended up being the front runners simply because I decided that 35mm was not a good fit for my style of photography, and Sigma's 50mm was underwhelming (although I hear rave reviews about good copies of it, but my copy was just all over the place in terms of focus and sharpness). At 2.8mm, I could see NO difference in image quality between 50mm 1.2 and 24-70 2.8. Neither could my photographer friends, some of whom are also huge prime lovers. This really took me by surprise, given my penchant for primes and the fact that I usually buy into the theory that primes are always better than comparable zooms. The 50mm seemed to render the skin of a doll that I used as my model slightly better (warmer), but the difference was very very subtle. In every other way (bokeh, sharpness, contrast), the pictures looked identical. So, it came down to extra stops of light vs. extra focal lengths. I really struggled with that choice, because frankly, I encounter the situations where I'd like more light than 2.8 or wider angle than 50mm about equally often, so either way, it'd be a loss for me. I almost went with 50mm because I figured, I was going to use 24mm and 35mm very rarely (again, just because of my style), I already have 70mm in another lens, so I was really buying just the 50mm, and then I might as well splurge on 50mm 1.2. What decided me in favor of 24-70 were 2 things: 1. I find f/1.2 and f/1.4 very unforgiving, and I avoid them as much as possible: I have 2 cheaper primes and never use 1.4, I always start with 1.8 in low-light situations, because I know I can get a fair amount of keepers with that. So, really, by going with 50mm 1.2, I was only gaining about 1 workable stop (for me), but losing multiple focal lengths. 2. I did a photoshoot where I purposefully took ONLY 50mm 1.2 with me, to see if I can pull it off. I did. But at one point, I found myself shooting in the shade that was quite close to the street, so I couldn't step further back without being hit by a car. While I still got good shots, it deprived me of a chance to do full-body shots in that location, and I think they would have looked really good. I really missed having 24-70 in that moment. I also love how (comparatively) light the 24-70mm is. Very manageable (but my other big lens is 70-200 f/4, so I'm used to a little heft around my neck). So, overall, a fantastic lens: very sharp, beautiful bokeh, very nice contrast, light for a zoom. The most popular negative review of this lens made much a-do about IS, so far, I don't miss it at all. I get many many keepers without IS, and if IS means heavier, than I don't want it anyway (not to mention that the IS version will surely be priced accordingly, and this lens is already way above my original budget).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2013 by Ana_y_lat
Style: Lens Only
First let me explain the comment about contents. This item was ordered as NEW, directly from Amazon. However when received it was obvious the package had been opened and lens was used. Lens Hood was also missing (didn't realize this some time later when it dawned on me there should have been one included). The factory UPC codes on the lens box was covered with what looked like blank address labels and the box was also sealed with one. I also noticed a slight "friction" noise when zooming, leading me to believe it had possibly been returned previously as defective. THE LENS: I received this just before taking a trip to Southern CA and was able to use it for a couple of weeks before having a chance to return. The noises I heard when zooming did not seem to have any effect on the results, luckily. This lens is tack sharp and takes beautiful pictures. Focus is fast and very accurate with this one too. Bought it to use on my 5D Mk II, but stuck it on my old Rebel also to see what kind of results it would give and it produced the best pictures yet from that smaller camera body as well. Just amazing clarity! If it weren't for the issues with it being used and missing parts (lens hood) this would definitely be a keeper. Had to return for these reasons, but thinking about reordering soon. I wondered if the price was too high for this model of lens but after seeing the results and the fact it is an f2.8, I believe now it is well worth the price. I would highly recommend, just double check and make sure what you receive is truly a new lens as described!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2015 by PhotoFreak
Style: Lens Only
Why the heck did I buy a two-grand lens?! Let's backtrack a bit. My 1st L lens is a 24mm f/1.4L USM II Prime and I still have this. Then I needed something with a zoom for a vacation we were going to-- enter the 24-105mm f/4L USM. And then someone hired me to do a wedding coverage... With the reviews I've read, there was only one thing I needed to do, out with the old zoom and in with the new. I thought I could make do with the 24-105mm but I found someone willing to take it off my hands. Thinking about long term, why not? I was impressed with some photos I've seen taken using the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM (version I), so it was safe to assume this one may render the same quality... or even better. My only direct comparison right now are the outputs from my 24mm f/1.4L USM II Prime. And yes, to some degree, the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM II shoots photos like a prime! Buying this lens actually made me think twice about keeping my prime because sometimes having it may be redundant. But, with the falling price of this prime, I'm not sure if I want to take the hit as opposed to keeping a f/1.4 that really comes handy in low light situations. I'd probably faint once Canon launches a version with an IS, which I heard is coming out pretty soon-- late 2013, early 2014? Overall, this lens is superb and I'm always excited when using it. If you can wait it out until the one with the IS comes out, wait. In my case, the wedding I'll be doing is coming up before that so here I am 'suffering' with this lens in my hand. 07/24/13 UPDATE: Signed another wedding client after showing some sample wedding-themed shots using this lens. Meeting with a prospective client to do senior photos in August. Also, if any of you got wind of the weather down in Orlando, FL in the early weeks of June this year then let me tell you that Canon wasn't joking when they said "weather-sealing" (with filter of course, your camera should have weather-sealing too). I was 'forced' to test it out so you guys won't have to, but in case you're as 'adventurous' as myself then feel free to do so. :) Brought this lens with my prime but stored the latter in a safety box in a Disney World hotel 5 days out of 6. In fairness to my prime, it just didn't suit my needs at the time due to absence of a zoom. So far, I would still recommend this zoom lens with financial considerations aside.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2013 by Beaumont
Style: Lens Only
I'm a career photojournalist and bought the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II lens to fill that yawning gap between my 16-35 f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8. I've used this lens to shoot a variety of editorial, business, PR and party assignments. My impressions: 1. Dang, this sucker is expensive! I coughed up about $2200 with tax. 2. As everyone says, too bad it doesn't have IS. 3. Somewhat chunky, but anyone who handles pro gear will hardly notice. One disappointment is that the front section slides forward 1-1/2 inches when zooming from 24mm to 70mm. I'm surprised this Canon upgrade didn't incorporate an internal zooming mechanism like the 16-35 and 70-200. This weather-sealed lens uses a latch to lock at 24mm for travel and running around. 4. The lens analysis in DPreview.com is dead on: you see significant vignetting at f/2.8, but it settles down at f/4.0 and nearly disappears by f/5.6. Some minor barrel distortion. 5. Superb sharpness and contrast even at f/2.8, comparable to the legendary 70-200 f/2.8! Excellent color. 6. Truly superior lens flare control, even when shooting directly into light sources! Locking lens hood (included) is shallower than I prefer for optimal protection of that massive 82mm front element. My lens came with a standard snap-on lens cap; I replaced the Canon cap with a Fotodiox 05CAPT82x1 82mm Inner Pinch Lens Cap and it works nicely. 7. Close focusing is okay. Not macro quality, but close-ups at 70mm are acceptable, even at f/2.8. Conclusion: this is a real workhorse that will remain attached to one of my full frame bodies from now on. Horribly expensive, Canon is charging all the market will bear. But since I will probably use it for the next decade, I'm not complaining--too much! LOW LIGHT UPDATE: last week I had an assignment to shoot stills on the slasher/suspense movie set "Killing Mr. Right." I used this lens to shoot handheld existing light at f/2.8 the whole time. I was blown away with the razor sharp images! I was tap dancing right at the edge of usable existing light, but the photos turned out great! Yeah, I wish it had IS, but this lens is sharp enough to cut ya! UPDATE 2: I've been using this lens for two years now. It is my "go-to" lens that usually remains glued to one of my 5D III bodies. Optically it as good as or superior to almost all fixed focal length lenses.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2013 Reviewed in the United States on March 7, 2013 by hotdog12
Style: Lens Only
My review of the EF 24-70mm F/2.8 II USM. This lens is simply the best standard zoom lens on the market. When you first hold this lens in your hand, you know you are holding a powerful and valuable object of the finest digital imaging technology. The build quality is rigid, solid, and sleek. The lens filter is surprising large compared to most lenses at 82mm diameter. It has a lock switch only at 24mm, AF & MF mode switch, focus ring and focal length ring. Aside from the exterior technical details, the 24-70mm depicts some of the most beautiful, gorgeous and stunning colors that I have ever seen a lens can produce. Some may ask, can this lens really be that good and worth high price tag? Some may ask, can't I just get away with an affordable lens? It certainly depends on your photography goals, but if you want the sharpest, cleanest shots to enhance your skill to the professional grade level, this is the lens. After hemming and hawing for months over whether I should buy this lens or not, I made the leap of faith, and I must honestly say that I don't regret it. In fact, unless I'm using my super telephoto lens, this lens practically is glued to my 7D Mark II now as my all around go to standard zoom lens. The only thing I wish Canon could improve on the quality of the lens hood. It feels too 'plastic'. I really do like the quality of the older lens hoods from years ago with more solid harder plastic material. The saving grace with the new lens hood is that it has nice lock switch. In conclusion, the 24-70mm is a first class lens!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2015 by Ezra
Style: Lens Only
Pros: -Tack-sharp -Fast & accurate AF -Very useful range Cons: -Expensive 82mm filter size -Much more expensive than previous version A little about me: -I'm a hobbyist -I've never been paid for doing photography -I enjoy taking portraits of people (mostly my infant son) and animals This is an amazing piece of glass. Great build with quality material and it has a nice weight. If you're looking for a general purpose zoom and are not wanting to sacrifice image quality, this is it. Although not as versatile as the 24-105, the image quality definitely makes up for it. The extra stop of light is also a big bonus. At 70mm and F/2.8, portraits look beautiful and has amazing bokeh. Even on my 60D this lens is a stellar performer. It focuses very quickly and accurately. For what I do this lens is very close to perfect. The images are sharp, even at 100% magnification. On my crop sensor camera, there's isn't really any loss of sharpness in the corners of the image. Even when shot at F/2.8, I don't see a loss in sharpness. This lens produces accurate colors, saturation, and nice contrast. There aren't really anything bad I can say about the images it produces. For the price, there are a few things I would have really liked to have in this lens. Although many people will say you do not need image stabilization for the focal lengths in this lens, there are even more people who'd really appreciate it. Videographers, for example, would have loved it. I believe a lot of videographers went with, or at least seriously considered, the Tamron 24-70 with VC because of the lack of IS on the Canon. Although the Tamron has lower quality optics, image stabilization is more important to some. Image stabilization would also help in low-light situations where you do not need to freeze the action. I would have also liked to have an internal zoom mechanism. I realize it would make the form factor longer and less compact, but I prefer to have fewer moving parts exposed to the elements. I also wish the filter size was 77mm instead of 82mm. Not only will you have to buy new filters for this lens, but the 82mm will cost quite a bit more than the 77mm did. This lens is about twice the price of the version 1 around the time it was discontinued. For my uses, I don't think the improvements are worth that steep of a climb in price. However, I do not regret the purchase. I'm very satisfied with it and I would recommend it to anyone with the funds. You won't be disappointed, unless you're looking for features that aren't there.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2013 by Horo