Checking for product changes
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 4 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Jul 15 – Jul 16
Recently Viewed
Style: Lens Only
Features
- 24-70mm focal length, 38.4-112mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F2.8 constant maximum aperture; F22 minimum, Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing
- 82mm filters, Closest Focusing Distance: 0.38m/1.25 ft.
- Image Stabilization : No
- Purchase this product between May 1, 2016 and July 30, 2016 and get 13 months of free damage protection from Canon. The product must be registered within 30 days of the purchase date to be eligible.
Description
Meeting the ever-increasing demands on image quality that digital photography brings, the redesigned EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM is the latest update to the acclaimed L-Series of EF optics, re-establishing a new standard for superb optics, high-end durable construction and performance in professional zoom lenses. A standard focal length zoom lens, it features a large aperture throughout its focal length. Filter size: 82 mm, Closest Focusing Distance: 1.25 feet. Maximum magnification (x) - 0.21(at 70mm).
Specs & Other Info
| Specification | Details |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Canon |
| Zoom Capability | Wide-angle to mid-range |
| Lens Classification | Zoom lens |
| Supported Camera Mount | Canon EF mount |
| Lens Description | 70 months warranty coverage |
| Physical Dimensions | 113.3 x 88.9 x 88.9 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kilograms |
| Model Number | 5175B002 |
| Continued Production | No |
| Availability Date | February 2012 |
| Manufacturing Country | Japan |
Frequently asked questions
The aperture range of the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens goes from f/2.8 to f/22. The wide f/2.8 aperture is constant throughout the zoom range, which allows for great performance in low light conditions and the possibility to achieve a shallow depth of field.
The Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens is compatible with Canon full-frame DSLRs as well as APS-C models. However, on APS-C cameras, it will have an effective focal length of approximately 38-112mm due to the crop factor.
No, the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens does not come with built-in image stabilization. Users may need to use a tripod or a camera with in-body stabilization for steady shots at slower shutter speeds.
Yes, the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L Lens features weather sealing which makes it resistant to dust and moisture. This allows photographers to use it in various challenging weather conditions.
Top Amazon Reviews
🚀 Abunda's Overview
This is our summary and key points to consider based on customer reviews.
The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II lens receives high praise from experienced photographers for its superb sharpness, contrast, and flare control, even though it is considered expensive. Users are impressed by the lens' performance in low light and its build quality, despite the lack of IS (Image Stabilization) and some noting that the lens is bulkier than expected. The versatility and image quality of the lens make it a favorite for many.
Pros
- 🔍 Exceptional sharpness and image quality
- 🎨 Excellent color reproduction and contrast
- 🌞 Impressive flare control, even in challenging lighting
- 🛠️ High-quality build and weather-sealed design
- 🔒 Lens locking mechanism for secure travel
- 🔄 Usable in diverse photography situations
Cons
- 💲 High price point
- ⚖️ Somewhat bulky and heavy
- 🔄 Front section extends when zooming, lacking internal zooming mechanism
- 🖼️ Visible vignetting at wide apertures
- 🔎 Lacks Image Stabilization (IS)
Should I Buy It?
If you are looking for a versatile, high-quality lens that can handle a wide range of shooting conditions and deliver outstanding images, the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II is a strong contender, despite its high cost. If you can overlook the absence of IS and handle its bulkiness, it could be a terrific long-term investment for your photography needs.
Style: Lens Only
Arrived on time, came perfectly, work wonders! Product exactly as described.
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2025 by Jose Jaquez
Style: Lens Only
I am a huge fan of primes: If I had infinite resources, I'd buy every L-grade prime between 35mm and 200mm! So, I do not recommend zooms just for the convenience of it. Before I decided on this lens, I have tried Sigma's 35mm and 50mm and Canon's 35mm L and 50mm L - so as you can see, I gave primes a fair chance to find a place in my photo bag. Canon's 50mm 1.2 and this lens (24-70) ended up being the front runners simply because I decided that 35mm was not a good fit for my style of photography, and Sigma's 50mm was underwhelming (although I hear rave reviews about good copies of it, but my copy was just all over the place in terms of focus and sharpness). At 2.8mm, I could see NO difference in image quality between 50mm 1.2 and 24-70 2.8. Neither could my photographer friends, some of whom are also huge prime lovers. This really took me by surprise, given my penchant for primes and the fact that I usually buy into the theory that primes are always better than comparable zooms. The 50mm seemed to render the skin of a doll that I used as my model slightly better (warmer), but the difference was very very subtle. In every other way (bokeh, sharpness, contrast), the pictures looked identical. So, it came down to extra stops of light vs. extra focal lengths. I really struggled with that choice, because frankly, I encounter the situations where I'd like more light than 2.8 or wider angle than 50mm about equally often, so either way, it'd be a loss for me. I almost went with 50mm because I figured, I was going to use 24mm and 35mm very rarely (again, just because of my style), I already have 70mm in another lens, so I was really buying just the 50mm, and then I might as well splurge on 50mm 1.2. What decided me in favor of 24-70 were 2 things: 1. I find f/1.2 and f/1.4 very unforgiving, and I avoid them as much as possible: I have 2 cheaper primes and never use 1.4, I always start with 1.8 in low-light situations, because I know I can get a fair amount of keepers with that. So, really, by going with 50mm 1.2, I was only gaining about 1 workable stop (for me), but losing multiple focal lengths. 2. I did a photoshoot where I purposefully took ONLY 50mm 1.2 with me, to see if I can pull it off. I did. But at one point, I found myself shooting in the shade that was quite close to the street, so I couldn't step further back without being hit by a car. While I still got good shots, it deprived me of a chance to do full-body shots in that location, and I think they would have looked really good. I really missed having 24-70 in that moment. I also love how (comparatively) light the 24-70mm is. Very manageable (but my other big lens is 70-200 f/4, so I'm used to a little heft around my neck). So, overall, a fantastic lens: very sharp, beautiful bokeh, very nice contrast, light for a zoom. The most popular negative review of this lens made much a-do about IS, so far, I don't miss it at all. I get many many keepers without IS, and if IS means heavier, than I don't want it anyway (not to mention that the IS version will surely be priced accordingly, and this lens is already way above my original budget).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2013 by Ana_y_lat
Style: Lens Only
I purchased this lens in 2013 and have waited to get some really good use out of it before posting this review. I use this lens on my Canon 7D and my Canon Mark 5D Mark lll. This is the greatest lens I've ever used... challenged only by the Canon 70-200mm L IS II. It is unbelievably sharp throughout the zoom range. I've taken shots that would rival the most expensive primes. Focusing is almost instantaneous. You target it, and it focuses... . The build is solid and strong. It is not nearly as heavy though as the previous model. This EF lens features a zoom lock which prevents the barrel from zooming out while hanging from the neckstrap and also has full-time manual focusing (like most Canon lenses). The lens diameter is 82mm which is the same as my EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM so IF I wanted to use a filter, it would interchange between these two lenses. This is my workhorse lens in my Fashion businesses. I shoot mostly indoors with a Canon 5D Mark lll. This lens works perfectly on this camera. I use the f/2.8 more than any other f/stop on the lens and it gives me great indoor shots that my business requires. Coupled with the Speedlite 600EX-RT they are a team that works well together. The lens has been redesigned and the main result is improved sharpness throughout. The lens is very fast to focus and works well in all lighting circumstances. It is now more water and dust proof. It is built to last. The hood is a short wing design PROS: - Build quality - feels solid but not as heavy as it's predecessor. Zoom and focus rings are a bit snug but they both rotate smoothly. - AF performance - on the 5D Mk III it locks focus quickly. It SEEMS like it's faster than the original which I have only used one time. - Image quality - Sharp and beyond belief. This lens produces super sharp images of high resolution and produces photos as good as any prime lens. Cons: The only con to this lens is no IS. I was hoping that they were going to release an IS version of this lens but in speaking to Canon at the last Professional Photography Imaging Convention, they have no plans at that time to release this lens with IS, mainly because it would add quite a bit of weight to the lens. I won't say cost is a con. You get what you pay for and if you have chosen this lens you are now enjoying the sharpness and quality build of one of the best if not the best lens Canon offers so no conplaint on the price since anyone using this chose to purchase it at that price. I have shot people, landscape, waterscape, fashion, sunsets and sunrises and birds with this lens in RAW and JPEG. It is definitely over the top for quality photos especially on my Canon 5D Mark lll.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2016 by AReviewer.of.online.Products AReviewer.of.online.Products
Style: Lens Only
I shoot with a 1DX Mark II and an EOS R and have for that last 5 years. I've always had the EF 16-35 and EF 70-200 and had always longed for the mid range, but found myself able to manage with cropping in on images or shooting in 4K for video (since both of my cameras crop in) to get some extra focal range. I'd be tormented as to whether to get the new RF 24-70 F2.8 or RF28-70 F2, but I really didn't want to get rid of the 1DX because it has worked so well across photo and video for me and I just don't need more than it can do right now. I wanted to invest in the newest lens tech, but was considering getting this EF24-70 just to retain the ability to use it on the 1DX even though I figured the upcoming R1 is on my radar. But then, alas, the price dropped to $1649 and it made it an easier decision. I was surprised that the build-quality of this actually seems superior to even the newest EF 16-35. I don't know why this went on sale, as it's not on sale anywhere else that I can tell. It's a great value at $1649 and I'm happy I pulled the trigger. I was very unconvinced of a huge step up between the EF and RF lenses regarding image quality, so I think this all worked out wonderfully. Excited to put it to daily use in my travels (which are about 6 months out of the year!).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2024 by Connor Smith