Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLR Cameras
Condition: New
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Zip, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
30-day refund/replacement
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 3 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Friday, Sep 4
Recently Viewed
Features
- Constant f2.8 3.2x zoom lens developed exclusively for use with Nikon DX Format, optimized for Nikon digital SLRs
- Dust and waterproof rubber sealing mount. Focal length : 17-55mm. Maximum Reproduction Ratio : 0.20x
- High optical performance by aspherical lenses and ED glass elements
- Silent Wave Motor enables ultra-high-speed autofocusing with exceptional accuracy and powerful super-quiet operation
- M/A mode for quick switching between autofocus and manual operation
Description
L1)NIKON 17-55MM F2.8G IF-ED (2147) From the Manufacturer: Lens-making is an art--Nikon artisans craft Nikkor optics from the finest materials, taking pride in adding their intellect and technique to bring the world's finest lenses to life. They push the leading edge of lens-making in their effort to provide the "glass" that makes the world's greatest pictures. The Nikon 17-55mm f2.8G ED-IF AF-S DX is the world's first constant f2.8 3.2x zoom lens developed exclusively for use with Nikon DX Format. The 3.2x zoom covers from a wide angle of 79 degrees to a narrow angle of 28 degrees 50 minutes (equivalent to 25.5mm to 85.5mm for 35mm format) and is ideal for architecture, landscape, groups shots and portraits.
Brand: Nikon
Focal Length Description: 17-55 millimeters
Lens Type: Standard
Compatible Mountings: Nikon F (DX)
Camera Lens Description: 17
Focal Length Description: 17-55 millimeters
Lens: Standard
Compatible Camera Mount: Nikon F (DX)
Maximum Focal Length: 5.5 centimeters
Minimum Focal Length: 17 millimeters
Lens Design: Zoom
Focus Type: Ultrasonic
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 5.5 centimeters
Lens Coating Description: Super Integrated Coating
Zoom Ratio: 3.2x
Image stabilization: digital,optical
Real Angle Of View: 79 degrees
Maximum Aperture: 2.8 f_stop
Minimum Aperture: 22
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
Compatible Camera Models: Nikon D1, Nikon D100, Nikon D2H
Photo Filter Size: 7.7 centimeters
Lens Mount: Nikon F
Brand: Nikon
Camera Lens: 17
Model Name: 2147
UPC: 018208021475
Manufacturer Part Number: JAA788DA
Global Trade Identification Number: 75
Unit Count: 1 Count
Built-In Media: AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8G IF-ED Zoom Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras, CL-1120 Soft Case, HB-31 Bayonet Lens Hood, LC-77 Front Lens Cap, LF-4 Rear Lens Cap
Item Part Number: JAA788DA
Item Weight: 755 g
Manufacturer: Nikon
Model Number: 2147
Color: Black
Compatible Devices: Nikon Cameras, Nikon Digital SLRs
Exposure Control Type: Automatic
Media Type: ProductImage
Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Video Capture Format: MP4
Video Capture Resolution: 1080p
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Friday, Sep 4
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- Zip Pay in 4
- Financing through Apple Pay
- Financing through Google Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Top Amazon Reviews
Color: Black
The lenses I've owned in similar ranges are the Nikon 18-70mm f/3.5-4.5 and the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8. Comparing this lens to the 18-70mm is probably a bit unfair, so I won't mention it again. However, there are many people looking for alternatives and the Tamron 17-50mm is as close as it gets so I'll base this review as a comparison to the Tamron. Having owned the Tamron for a few weeks before offing it, I can tell you this. If you're looking for a lens that equally matches or even exceeds the 17-55mm in terms of image quality, then by all means, go for the Tamron. Equality pretty much ends there. The advantages of the Nikon 17-55mm are the following: BUILD QUALITY - You immediately notice the build quality as soon as you handle and inspect the 17-55mm. It's encased in metal and nicely sealed so dust, moisture (which leads to fungus) will hopefully be minimized. "Built like a tank" is a good cliche. FAST FOCUS - The Silent Wave Motor is not only fast, but extremely quiet. SHARP WIDE OPEN - Using an aperture of f/2.8, this lens is very usable. Another advantage is that is focuses more accurately in low light. This is an aspect that was inferior in the Tamron. COLOR RENDITION - I've found colors out of the lens are very satisfying with little need to "tweak" during post processing. The Tamron had a warmer color, but this may vary among copies. MINIMAL CA - CA didn't bother me much in the Tamron, but it's much more controlled on the 17-55mm, especially wide open. BETTER QUALITY CONTROL - This was the deal breaker with the Tamron. I received a copy that overexposed which is in line with the experiences of many people with that particular lens. Although sample variance exists with Nikon, it's much more controlled. SIZE/WEIGHT/BALANCE - Some people mention this lens is too bulky and heavy. I find the size and weight actually helpful and helps balance and control on the majority of camera bodies. The 17-55mm doesn't have any major flaws for me. I'm not a professional nor am I a pixel peeper. I'm just an enthusiast that likes good image quality. However, if I were to knit pick, here are the flaws: SMALL ZOOM RING - It's annoyingly small at first, but you get used to it. FLARES EASILY - Point it at a light source directly or even indirectly and this lens has a propensity to flare. You can certainly use the massive hood to mitigate flare. DISTORTION AT WIDE END - Some say the distortion at the wide end makes this lens unusable for landscape/architecture work. If you're looking for a lens specifically for that task, you may want to consider a true wide angle lens like the 12-24mm or 14-24mm or go Sigma 10-20mm. However, I find this lens quite usable at the wide end. One peculiarity with the 17-55mm is that it's at its shortest length almost fully zoomed at around 45mm and longest and fully extended at 17mm. I found this amusing since I haven't experienced other lenses with this characteristic. In my research, I also considered the new Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8. This lens should definitely be on your list because it offers the latest technology and it's a full frame (FX) lens. I ruled it out because it's not only $500 more than the 17-55mm, but also because it's not wide enough for my purposes. Also, I happen to be under the opinion that DX has at least a few more years before it becomes obsoleted/deprecated by FX. People are beginning to recommend against investing in DX lenses, but IMHO, affordable full frame bodies are years away. Ultimately, I selected the Nikkor 17-55mm over the Tamron 17-50mm because of its superior usability wide open. The hit on my pocketbook was rather significant, but I have no regrets of getting such a excellent lens with a great usable range. If Nikon ever added VR to this lens, then it would be a dream come true. I state this because I often need to use a shutter speed of 1/30 or slower when shooting in low light and I rarely use a tripod. VR would come in extremely handy in this situation to prevent camera shake. I highly recommend this lens. It's on my camera 9 times out of 10. Okay, I'll stop now.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 8, 2008 by mattbytes
Color: Black
This is the first lens I purchased for my Nikon D7000 and I think that it may have skewed my expectations - after using this lens, all of the other Nikon DX lenses seem to pale in comparison. The Good: ------------------- Make no mistake about it, this is a pro-grade lens and you will probably get the most out of it on Nikon's only "pro grade" DX camera, the D7000. It will work on just about all of the other camera bodies, however. It's body is made out of metal and its constant f/2.8 means great performance across its range of focal lengths even in dim lighting. On a DX camera you're getting 26mm to 83mm and everything in between, so with this one lens you can effectively handle most photographic work. I like this aspect from a business standpoint, because can go to the long end for excellent portraits or the short end for excellent wide-angle shots. This lens effectively replaces a bag of primes and I can confidently say it performs BETTER than the other primes available for DX cameras; it's basically an FX lens downsized to the DX format and quality was not sacrificed. Taking pictures with this lens will really unleash the potential of your D7000, but it will have the nasty side effect of making all of your other lenses look bad. I have completed a couple shoots using this lens and the results were night-and-day with other DX options, namely the 35mm f/1.8G (about 53mm on full-frame cameras). In all lighting conditions the results were substantially better with the 17-55mm lens, and considering the focal ranges it covers as well as its quality, the price is justifiable. The Bad: ------------------- It's freakin heavy! The 17-55 weighs in just under 2 lbs and that bulk seems to get heavier if you have to carry it around your neck for any extended period of time...though to be honest it's not as bad as I thought it would be - just make sure you get a quality padded camera strap like the one made by OP-TECH. It's BIG so it will partially block the AF assist light on the D7000 when you are not using the included hood, and when you do use the hood it blocks the AF assist light almost entirely. The big size also interferes with the D7000's built in flash, causing a shadow to appear on the lower half of your shots...if you want to use a flash, you'll need to go with a dedicated unit. Expensive in relation to other DX lenses, but then again it's the only DX-specific lens that isn't a hunk of junk. Its constant f/2.8 speed makes it versatile enough to be usable in poor lighting, but it's not ideal for "flashless" low light photography. Y u no have nano crystal coating!? How I use it: ------------------- I love this lens for model shoots and portraits, but it also does well with anything that does not require super zoom or ultra-wide angle. I am a fan of available light and prefer to make the subject work within the scene rather than making a scene for the subject...like a challenge, if you will. The Lumix GH2 camera that I have been using before the D7000 delivered impressive results with its 25mm Leica lens and its 14-140mm Zoom - but the D7000 with the 17-55mm stepped my game up from "hi I'm a freelance picture guy with a camera" to more of a pro-level "take a number and wait your turn" kinda photographer. In other words, the pictures it is capable of taking sell themselves and then some! Recommendation: ------------------- If you enjoy taking pictures in the 17-55mm focal length range on a DX camera, this is the best lens you can get for that purpose. The quality you get with this lens is generally better than what you get from the primes of the same focal length. If you're strapped for cash you could consider renting one of these from a local camera shop to get a feel for it, otherwise get it and make sure you have a decent camera too.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2012 by Functional
Color: Black
I initially owned the Nikon 18-200mm VR lens after purchasing my Nikon D300 body earlier this year. The 18-200 of course is a do-all mid-line lens and shouldn't be too critically compared to the professional line of Nikon glass. I used the 18-200 briefly as I became more familiar with my new D300 and found the images from the 18-200 were adequate, although not as crisp and sharp and high contrast as many of my Canon lenses had been before I migrated over to the Nikon side after 12+ years of using Canon gear. When I recently got a wedding shoot to do that required only available light and no flash for the entire 1 hour ceremony I now had the reason to consider purchasing the 17-55. Considering the Nikon 18-200 falls well short of a large enough aperture for low light photography and in reviews, is softer in resolution over-all anyway compared to the 17-55, this was my motivation to sell my 18-200 and pick up the Nikon 17-55 2.8 lens. (I've also added a 70-300mm Nikon VR to my bag to fill the telephoto void, I posted an excellent review on Amazon for this lens as well). The wedding was very recently shot, with most all images during the available light ceremony shot wide open at 2.8 due to the very low lighting in the church. Much to my relief, the images all turned out superbly and were very sharp, had excellent contrast and color saturation even wide open (I always shoot RAW for most important photo jobs). I was also absolutely delighted in the lens regarding how quick the focus was in the low light (basically instant with no hesitation nor any hunting as soon as the shutter release was pressed to record the image). Many shots required a large shift in focus from far to very close-up and the 17-55 didn't fail me even once, frame to frame. In many cases I had to quickly raise the camera to my eye and fire off a burst with no lag time to spare for the focus to occur if I was to capture a perfect shot and not miss the opportunity. The lens never failed here even once. They say, you get what you pay for and considering the 17-55 goes for around the $1200 mark, you're getting the excellent optical quality that only a high end Nikon lens can give you. If you need to shoot in low light levels, or just simply want the very best images that your camera can give you, a high-end lens is the ONLY way to go. This lens will not dissapoint you once-so-ever.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2008 by Al A.
Color: Black
Most reviews of this lens note how heavy it is, but still, when you first hold it it's quite amazing. Certainly if you are using anything smaller than a D7xxx or D90, it makes your rig front-heavy. That isn't necessarily a problem, but it's still worth mentioning. In terms of image quality, I haven't tested it (or used it) extensively enough to make any strong claims, but what I've seen I am extremely happy with, both in terms of color rendition and sharpness. The reason for 4, rather than 5, stars are the ergonomics. The zoom ring is set unintuitively far back on the lens, almost far enough that the camera body interferes with it. More annoyingly, it is really stiff. Like, you need to force the zoom. Reviews around the web do highlight this problem, but I feel they downplay it. All other things being equal, this problem would keep me from recommending this lens to others. Fortunately for Nikon, not all other things are equal, and the build quality and optical characteristics of the lens allow one to overlook the terribly designed zoom ring.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on November 29, 2015 by V. Jawahar
Color: Black
I bought this as an upgrade to my existing 18-55 lens. Not a professional photographer but I have been working photos since Photoshop version 2.5 and I know a good shot when I see it. My 18-55 really did a nice job considering the cost and size. When I got the 17-55, first thing I did was try to setup something to compare both lenses. I did a hand-held shot of a grouping of fallen leaves with both lenses sans filters at same apertures and focal lengths. The shutter speed ended up being just slightly different due to either change of outdoor lighting or brightness of the lenses for proper exposure. When examined zoom out... the photos were very close in appearance which was surprising. However, when zoomed in... the differences became clear. The 17-55 produced more detail in some of the leaves mainly the veins of the leaves. If you were buying this lens alone for this reason... the price might not justify it. Further research shows the AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II to just about out perform most of the other offerings from competitors in this zoom and price range which could explain why images were very close. So... why pay the price? Ok, the other thing of note is the extra f/stop down to 2.8. At 55mm the 18-55 is at 5.6 with widest aperture setting while the 17-55 can still hold it at f/2.8. Even at this wide open setting... I was amazed how much detail it captures. I shoot a lot of landscapes and often would go for aperture settings of f/8 -16 to maintain detail and DOF on the slower lenses but... I have been surprised how much DOF I could get at even f/3.3-4 which has been nice on those evenings when sun is dipping low and I don't feel like getting the tripod out. The lens is big... and it is a bit heavy... but everything about it says quality to me. It feels like a solid and well built lens in hand that can probably withstand a fair amount of abuse from traveling and the environment. I would probably prefer the zoom ring and focusing ring to have swapped places as the focus ring is in front and zoom in back but that is probably just my personal preference. I am throughly happy with the lens and its the most used lens I have at the moment on my D200. I look forward to getting more f/2.8 Nikkor lenses now.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on October 24, 2008 by Dean C. Neitman
Color: Black
This is a great lens that I will be hanging on to. Really had no plans to buy a DX lens but after walking around SF with the Nikon D700 and its trinity of lenses I decided against the FX route. Biggest noticeable difference between the D700 and D7000 is the lack of noise at 800 ISO and above. But just not worth the weight and $1500 premium over the cost of my D7000, in my mind. The lens is great, solid, focuses quickly , sharp, contrasty(much better than the 16-85) and clear. Sure it's around $1430 (B&H) but worth the investment I believe. A better lens than the 16-85 in my mind, no VR but hey you have a great Nikon camera that excels at low light and this lens drops down to f/2.8 making it a very fast lens and having the ability to shoot in lower light. Great lens I recommend it. See picture. Shooting more and had a chance to use this often and check the pictures. Excellent glass! I can always count on this lens for its sharpness and clarity. If you know you will be staying with a DX lens this is a worthy investment! Highly recommend!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2011 Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2011 by Mark Chandler
Color: Black
This is a case of you get what you pay for and what's promised. As the spec's & everyone says it's big, solidly built, smooth, fast focusing, etc. It handles well on my D200, should be the same on a D300 and probably OK on a D80. Smaller bodies might be overwhelmed. Optics are top notch. I tested mine against the Zeiss Contax G 45 & 28mm lenses and was pleased (yes, film vs digital was a big factor). As when shooting with Zeiss glass, with the 17-55 you just use the aperture & focal length you want or need. Wide open is no problem. The few weak points are minor and (for me) don't come into play very often. There's a hint of color fringing at 17mm but it was gone at 18-19mm (28mm equiv. on 35mm format). Color fringes are auto-corrected in Capture NX and presumably in D300 .jpgs. So if you see lens tests that sample each extreme plus a middle focal length they'll overstate the issue. Yes there's barrel distortion at the wide end & a little pincushion at the long end. I'll differ with one review in saying that the distortion is regular & easy to correct when you need to. Many 17-55 owners use it as their work-horse. It can be an intimidating sight to your subjects with the hood mounted. I'd recommend a high quality UV filter to have the option of reducing the visual impact. VR, a little more zoom range & a little less bulk would help on paper. In use you just bring the camera to your eye and know that the lens will deliver.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2008 by Bob G
Color: Black
I received this lens & it is beautiful. Unfortunately, it arrived & there appears to be a lens malfunction or something wrong with the electrical components. When I attached it to my camera I received an F0 error. I confirmed the lens was snapped into place. Tried with three other lenses I own & did not receive this error. Auto-focus & aperture control do not function with this error. Hoping to hear back from the seller as to how to resolve this.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2024 Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2024 by ape15