Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD for Sony Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount, Black
Condition: Used - Very Good
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Saturday, Jul 18
Recently Viewed
Features
- Lightest and most compact in its class of fast tele zooms for Sony full-frame mirrorless
- VXD linear motor focus mechanism delivers high-speed and high precision autofocus performance
- Superior optical design for uncompromised image quality. Camera-based lens unit firmware updates
- Moisture-Resistant Construction, Fluorine Coating, and Zoom Lock switch
Description
The 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD (Model A056) large aperture telephoto zoom lens is designed for Sony E-mount full-frame mirrorless cameras and is just as comfortable on APS-C mirrorless as well. The greatest feature is its superb performance even while attaining a high-speed F/2.8 aperture across the entire zoom range and offering the world's lightest and most compact package at just 5.9" length (at the 70mm setting) and a weight of 28.6 oz. Thanks to the generous use of special lens elements, the 70-180mm F/2.8 achieves excellent optical performance from center to edge. With the short MOD (Minimum Object Distance) of 33.5", the 70-180mm F/2.8 expands the possibilities for photographic expression. For the AF drive, Tamron has newly developed the VXD (Voice-coil eXtreme-torque Drive), a linear motor focus mechanism that delivers high-speed and high precision autofocus performance for both stills and video. Add it all together and you can go light while going long—and get the shot!
Brand: Tamron
Focal Length Description: 70-180 Millimeters
Lens Type: Telephoto
Compatible Mountings: Sony E
Camera Lens Description: Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD for Sony Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount, Black
Focal Length Description: 70-180 Millimeters
Lens: Telephoto
Compatible Camera Mount: Sony E
Maximum Focal Length: 180
Minimum Focal Length: 70
Lens Design: Zoom
Focus Type: Auto Focus
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 180 Millimeters
Lens Coating Description: Fluorine Coating
Zoom Ratio: 2.571
Image stabilization: Optical
Real Angle Of View: 34.35 Degrees
Maximum Aperture: 2.8 Millimeters
Minimum Aperture: 22
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
Compatible Camera Models: Sony E-mount cameras
Photo Filter Size: 67 Millimeters
Lens Mount: Sony E
Brand: Tamron
Camera Lens: Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD for Sony Full Frame/APS-C E-Mount, Black
Model Name: Tamron 70-180mm F/2.8 Di III VXD
UPC: 725211560012
Manufacturer Part Number: AFA056S700
Unit Count: 1.0 Count
Model Number: AFA056S700
Item Weight: 28.6 Ounces
Manufacturer: Tamron
Built-In Media: Front cap, rear cap
Warranty Description: 6 year USA
Video Capture Format: MP4
Video Capture Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Maximum Shutter Speed: 1/4000 seconds
Exposure Control Type: Automatic
Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Media Type: ProductImage
Viewfinder Type: Electronic viewfinder
Color: Black
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Saturday, Jul 18
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
After a lifetime of shooting with Canon cameras, I recently switched to the Sony mirrorless system with a Sony a9. With a Sigma lens adapter, I can still use my amazing Canon lenses, but being that they are non-native lenses to the Sony, they work for stationary and slow to medium moving subjects. The Canon lenses can't keep up with the fast action that the Sony a9 camera body is so famous for. So I knew that a few new lenses need to be added. I've spent enough time behind a camera to know pretty quickly whether a lens is working for me or not. After testing several Sony lenses that were lack-luster and were returned, I decided to give this one a try. I have the equivalent of this lens from Canon. And it is the finest lens that I own. To my shock and amazement, this little gem of Tamron's is exceeding my expectations. It's about half the weight, half the size and a fraction of the price of my equivalent Canon lens. Why did I need this if I already have the Canon 2.8 lens you ask? Because I have no interest in hiking, walking and exploring long distances with a lens the size and weight of a sewer pipe hanging around my neck. This little Tamron is the perfect hiking companion. It is much more of a "walk-about" lens than my Canon one is. For me there are two things that I look for in any camera lens. A: Sharpness B: Consistency of performance. This lens aces both. I will pay more for these qualities, but in this case, you don't have to. The fixed 2.8 aperture is such an amazing thing to have in a lens and this lens syncs up with my Sony a9 perfectly. There is a slight "clunking" sound when the lens focuses, but with the reading that I've done, this is normal, so it's fine. I've found that I can get to within about 14" of my subject while zoomed all the way in, which gives this lens a bit of a "macro" feature...not a true macro, but very nice for a mid-range zoom. Tamron used a lot of plastic on this lens to keep the weight down. It feels very solid to me. I'm not hard on my camera gear, so I don't see that as a problem. Also, there is no image stabilization within the lens. I shot in all kinds of light and I admit that I've got a fairly steady hand, so that is not going to be an issue for me at all. And my camera body has some stabilization built in to it. For the money, you just can't beat this lens for your Sony E mount cameras. There is a reason that most photographers are giving this thing five stars. I'll let my images speak for themselves.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2020 Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2020 by JJ
Pros - Great Build Quality - Relative light weight, well-balanced on the camera - Compact for it's focal length and brightness - Large, comfortable Zoom Ring - 1:2 Macro Capability in Manual Focus Mode - Sharp nearly through the zoom range and across the frame - Fun to shoot with! Cons - No lens stabilization - No autofocus switch or function button - Stops at 180mm instead of 200mm - Manual Ring close to the camera body versus on the end of the lens Long Review I had already owned the Sony FE 70-200 f/4 lens which I really liked but noticed that I wasn't using much. I tried using it for indoor photography with a Speedlite (flash), but the ISO levels were much higher than I felt comfortable with due to the f/4 limitation. It was also considerably bulkier than my 24-70 f/2.8; especially, with the tripod mount attached to the lens. Finally, the minimum focal distance was frankly terrible. I could get considerably closer to my subject with my 24-70 vs the 70-200, thus I shot the 24-70 almost all the time. After hearing rave reviews about the Tamron, and the ability to do Macro(ish) photography, I purchased the Tamron and placed the two head to head. Sharpness I didn't do much pixel peeping, but it seemed to me in the center of the frame, both the Sony and Tamron were sharp. The Sony fell apart in the corners pretty badly wide open. The Tamron definitely was sharper in the corners wide open (even at a full stop faster), but certainly not as sharp as the center of the frame. Brightness Aperture-wise the Tamron is a full stop faster than the Sony (f/2.8 vs f/4), but it actually seemed to pull in 1.25-1.5 stops of light. That is, in some situations where the Sony shot at ISO 800 at f/4, the Tamron seemed to be around ISO 300 at f/2.8 vs the expected ISO 400. I credit this to the due to the fact that light "transmission" of the lens is different than aperture. It just might be that the Sony has more lens elements and coatings that reduce light transmission versus the Tamron. To any effect, it was a nice little bonus. Minimum Focus Distance In autofocus mode, the Tamron can definitely get closer to a subject than the Sony, but reproduction ratio is still not as good as my Sony 24-70 f/2.8. Switching the Tamron to manual mode, and adjusting the Zoom ring to 70mm, you can get as close as 1:2 which is getting close to Macro territory. The center sharpness seems quite good at this setting, but it does get quite soft toward the edges of the frame. This is the only time that I missed having the manual focus ring on the end of the lens as I found it hard to hold the camera lens steady with my hand placed so close to the camera body. It's neat you get that bonus feature out of the lens, but those that want quality Macro images should still get a dedicated Macro lens. Low-Light Performance The Tamron seemed to get an additional 1-1.5 stops of light over my Sony depending on the focal length, but the Sony has lens Optical Image Stabilization built-in. With the Optical Image Stabilization turned ON, I was able to get (reliably) an additional 1-1.5 stops out of the shutter speed for still subjects. On the other hand, for moving subjects, the Tamron has the advantage as you can have faster shutter speeds with better Iso performance over the Sony. Indoor Photography with Speedlite Even with a Speedlite, I find larger apertures to be preferred. The larger the aperture, the brighter the background is which makes for more pleasing, natural looking photos. The Tamron created more pleasing images, at faster shutter speeds (or better ISO performance) than the Sony. Build Quality Reviewers lamented at Tamron's plastic housing calling it cheap and "kit lens" like. In my experience, nothing could be further from the truth. Yes, the housing is plastic, not metal, but the zoom and manual focus rings have a nice, smooth feel to them. In addition, while not terribly heavy, there is some heft to the Tamron lens and it feels solid. Finally, there is a nice tactile feel of the (huge) rubber Zoom Ring and Manual Focus ring. I will say that the Sony feels like a tank with its metal housing and internal zoom, but the Tamron is no "kit lens", it feels substantial in the hand and I personally like the black finish to the Sony's white. To be honest, after testing both lenses, I was conflicted if I really wanted to get rid of my Sony. Tamron seemed to only slightly edge out the Sony in all of my tests. But the deal-breaker was when I used the Tamron out in the field. It takes up less space in my bag and feels so much better in the hand than my Sony ever did. The fast aperture meant that I could pump up my shutter speed to freeze action or eek out better ISO performance. Where as with the Sony, I would shoot a little bit and then switch back to my 24-70, the Tamron I just enjoyed shooting so much that I would keep it on for much of the day. Needless to say, I sold my Sony and kept the Tamron.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 29, 2020 Reviewed in the United States on July 29, 2020 by Clinton A Wood
So far I'm really happy with this lens! I'm switching to a couple Sony A7III's from Nikon D750's and I have had the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8. I don't use that lens very often, but as a wedding photographer I feel way more comfortable when I have it in my bag just in case I need it. When I was deciding on my Sony kit, I originally planned on foregoing a 70-200 for a while and buying the Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 later when I could afford it since it's so expensive. Then someone mentioned the miracle lens Tamron 28-75 to me - which I'm also getting - but it made me wonder if Tamron had a comparable lens that might be a good option. I found this one and decided to take a chance on it. It feels great in my hands, maybe not quite as hefty & high end as the $$$$ Nikon or Sony version, but it certainly doesn't feel cheap. It's also much lighter weight, which is wonderful. I also definitely don't feel like I'll miss that extra 20mm in my line of work. And the biggest surprise for me is that there's absolutely no chromatic aberration, which is usually something that afflicts cheaper lenses. I attached a comparison of two shots of my hoya Hindu rope plant (I know it looks funny, but it illustrates the point well haha) - you can see that with the much pricier Sony Zeiss 50mm f/1.4, there's chromatic aberration visible on the plant hanger. This is super common with backlit subjects and is kind of a pain to fix. But the Tamron 70-180mm has absolutely zero chromatic aberration. So time will tell how well it holds up, but my initial reaction is that I'm incredibly happy! (These images were shot with the Sony A7RIV)
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2020 Reviewed in the United States on September 28, 2020 by MommaC
Bought it used and other then a couple of smudges on the outside casing it is a good lens. Definitely worth the price I will always recommend buying lenses used it saves money. You can get some good long distance shots and if it’s not long enough you can always zoom in editing it holds the quality.
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026 Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026 by Claudia Hesse
I used a Canon-mount 80-200mm lens 40 years ago, and enjoyed its versatility--back then there was no image stabilization, either IBIS (camera body) or lens stabilization--yet I was able to get great results as long as the images were in daylight. However with the low-light capabilities of a modern full-frame IBIS equipped camera, I am able to get very pleasant portraits indoors, even without lens image stabilization, and very rarely see any high-ISO noise. This means not merely that my camera's IBIS works well, but also that the Tamron's F2.8 maximum aperture with easily handheld shots, provides sharp images for indoor available-light portraits in a moderately lighted room. Then there's the occasional not-too-far-from-macro close ups it's able to take--I am re-learning to see the advantage of snapping small (yet-interesting-when-seen-closeup) things. In the long winter months it's a struggle to get interesting shots outdoors (we live in the Midwest USA's land of endlessly barren corn and bean fields) so I tend to stay indoors more, yet the Tamron 70-180 enables great shots so often I barely notice they were taken with a medium telephoto lens. Would it be nice if it had image stabilization? Sure. But not if I had to pay another grand to have that feature. This go-to lens is on my camera more than my 28-60mm kit lens, the 24mm 2.8, the 50mm 1.4, the 85mm 1.8, or the 150-500mm.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2022 by Mr_Edw
Easy way to fill out your Zoom-range Trinity (Wide, Standard, Telephoto). Sometimes, it does suck to not have the 180mm-200mm range most f2.8 Telephotos have, but the size and weight are great for those who want a lighter load (ish) or travel. Works great on my Sony A7 iv, though of course Sony puts a limiter for all non-Sony lenses to keep that in mind. Still, very minor complaints and can recommend for pro-casuals and starting out pros. (or those who need a lighter / smaller load).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 9, 2024 by Amazon Customer
This lens isn’t cheap but I knew I needed to upgrade my lenses. I knew the 2.8 aperture would be better for bringing in more light but I never thought the photos would be so sharp. I use this on an A6600 and you get use to the weight real fast. The people that complain about the lack of stabilization are right. The a6600 has built in stabilization and I experimented with it off and on and it does make a difference. I don’t have a full frame body so I can’t speak on that but don’t let anyone tell you it doesn’t work well on the A6600. Update: Finally managed to upgrade to the A7iii and yes full frame does make things better. The grip on the A7 iii allows you to hold this lens even steadier and the pictures are amazing. Not one regret with this lens. Especially when the price still beats anything out there.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 15, 2020 by Ron
I wanted to buy long zoom lens for my sony for a long time now. Sony 70-200/f2.8 was expensive and heavy for me. So I was thinking about buying 70-200/f4, but when I saw first reviews showing sharpness of this Tamron I decided to wait. I that was a right choice. With first images I was surprised with how sharp this lens is. It is also not much bigger than Tamron 28-75 that I also own (significantly heavier though, but that's to be expected). It doesn't have optical stabilization, which is good to have on telephoto lenses (in-body stabilization works better on smaller focal distances), but for the price and its versatility I expect it to be on my sony body a significant amount of time. And with the same 67mm filter diameter I don't have to buy new set of filters. Tamron wins my heart and my money once again! Update: after a few days I've noticed a sound as if something was loose inside the lens when shaken a bit. After some research I now know that its focusing mechanism that moves freely when camera is powered off (or lens is detached). This is due to this lens using electromagnetic coils to move focusing mechanism as oppose to servo motors. I would still recommend this lens as this doesn't affect picture quality or experience, but I wish they would come up with some solution to fix all moving parts when camera turns off.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2020 Reviewed in the United States on June 6, 2020 by volterr