Search  for anything...

Polk Audio Monitor XT15 Pair of Bookshelf or Surround Speakers - Hi-Res Audio Certified, Dolby Atmos & DTS:X Compatible, 1" Terylene Tweeter & 5.25" Dynamically Balanced Woofer, Midnight Black

  • Based on 1,331 reviews
Condition: New
Checking for product changes
$199.25 Why this price?

Buy Now, Pay Later


As low as $33.21 / mo
  • – 6-month term
  • – No impact on credit
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout. Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Selected Option

Free shipping on this product

This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.


Availability: In Stock.
Fulfilled by Amazon

Arrives Saturday, May 4
Order within 5 hours and 35 minutes
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Style: Monitor XT15


Pattern: Speaker


Features

  • COMPACT BOOKSHELF SPEAKER PAIR - Enjoy lifelike sound from movies, games, and music with Polk Monitor XT15 that features a 1" Tweeter & a 5.25" Dynamically Balanced Woofer for rich, clear audio, an open mid-range and punchy bass in an immersive soundstage
  • PREMIUM BUILD QUALITY AND MODERN DESIGN - An upgrade to the critically acclaimed Monitor series, the Polk Monitor XT series features latest innovations in affordable but great sounding speakers, and their stylish design blends with any home decor
  • VERSATILE PLACEMENT OPTIONS - Delivering maximum performance in a compact size, the speakers can be placed on a bookshelf, or a speaker stand (sold separately). Use the MXT15 as front, surround or rear speakers for a stunning home theater experience
  • CREATE AN AFFORDABLE HOME THEATER SETUP - The use of quality, timbre matched Polk components ensures seamless speaker-to-speaker blending. Create a unified surround system with MXT60 tower pair, MXT30 center channel, MXT90 height module and a MXT12 sub

Description

The product voltage arrange is 100V

Brand: Polk Audio


Model Name: MXT15


Speaker Type: Bookshelf Speaker


Connectivity Technology: Wired


Recommended Uses For Product: For Surround Sound Systems


Brand: Polk Audio


Model Name: MXT15


Unit Count: 2.0 Count


Included Components: Speaker


Model Number: MXT15BK


Target Gender: Unisex


Number of Items: 2


Color: Black


Recommended Uses For Product: For Surround Sound Systems


Vehicle Service Type: Car


Power Source: Corded Electric


Mounting Type: Wall Mount


Warranty Description: 5 Years


Controller Type: Corded Electric


Is Waterproof: FALSE


Speaker Type: Bookshelf Speaker


Audio Output Mode: Stereo


Surround Sound Channel Configuration: 5.1


Speaker Maximum Output Power: 40 Watts


Frequency Response: 40 KHz


Impedance: 8 Ohm


Connectivity Technology: Wired


Compatible Devices: Laptop, Personal Computer, Tablet, Smartphone


Product Dimensions: 6"D x 7"W x 10"H


Item Weight: 9 Pounds


Subwoofer Diameter: 5.25 Inches


Tweeter Diameter: 1 Inches


Speaker Size: 400 Millimeters


Frequently asked questions

If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is: Saturday, May 4

Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

  • Klarna Financing
  • Klarna Pay in 4
  • PayTomorrow Financing
  • Apple Pay Later
Leasing options through Acima may also be available during checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Top Amazon Reviews


  • A Lot Of Value In A Relatively Small Package
Style: Monitor 40 Pattern: Speaker
My Celestion Ditton IIs both blew their tweeters after almost forty years of wonderful listening and since original manufacturer's parts are no longer available, I had to retire them. I did a lot of online research and with Polk's name having been around now for more than 50 years, I decide to try the Monitor 40 Series II speakers. They have proved to be an excellent value in my home theater (10'X20'X7'), but there are a couple of caveats here. First, at this size as one would expect, they are just not going to deliver the bottom octave so I am using them with a subwoofer. Second, they do need a lengthy break in period (30 hours minimum) and at first I thought I had made a mistake here. I have them set up on 6 inch slanted upward floor stands about 2.5 feet from the corners my home theater and angled inwards at about 30 degrees. When I have evaluated other speakers for a vacation home or office, I use 3 reference recordings: one analog mastered vinyl (Mobile Fidelity Sound Lab's UHQR pressing of the Beatle's "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" 1982), one digitally mastered CD (Lorin Maazel conducting the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra's rendition of Tchaikovsky's Symphony #5 1988) and an analog mastered tape (Spyro Gyra recorded live at The Berklee College of Music's Berklee Performance Center with a Sony Pro Walkman WM-D6C and Sony LT-929 one point stereo microphone 1986) the last of which is obviously not available to the general public. Right out of the box these speakers have a harsh tone with male vocals to the point of being strident. Highs were sibilant, especially on cymbals. Bass was tight, well controlled and did not have an overemphasis on male voices, but needed help in the bottom octave from a subwoofer. First listening made me think oops, but I had to leave for a long weekend going to a wedding so I left my system on and put a wave file of an eclectic mix of music through the Windows Media Player on the computer I have hooked up to it set for continuous repeat. When I got home 3 days later, the sound had changed dramatically. Listening back to my reference recordings, male vocals had smoothed out considerably, highs were naturally softer and the bass had changed hardly at all. Imaging with these speakers is stable laterally and has remarkable depth. Transients are handled easily and without distortion. I misunderstood the description on Amazon and thought these were being sold singly for $199.00 each and I would be satisfied with them if it cost double that for a pair. That I ended up getting two pairs for $398.00 I thought was a real bargain and kept the second pair for when I retire and become a snowbird with a home down south. Bottom line here is that these speakers are a remarkable value for the price and when coupled with a subwoofer will allow you to enjoy any type of music with neutral accuracy. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2023 by drbarry1

  • Impressive bookshelf speakers ! ! ! Update 30March2016
Style: Monitor 40 Pattern: Speaker
I wanted to downsize my speakers. After listening to some borrowed Polk speakers, I liked the Polk sound. So I started shopping around and settled on these Monitor 40s. I wanted to have a pair of woofers in each speaker that could handle the mid-bass well (I also have an 8" subwoofer made by MartinLogan to handle the lower bass). I have two pairs now and drive them with a vintage quadraphonic (4 channel) receiver that has about 16 watts per channel. That may not sound like a lot of watts, but it's plenty. (By the way, most people listen to music at about 1 watt of receiver power. Yes, that's true.) The sensitivity (or efficiency) of these speakers is 89dB. That means that these speakers will put out 89dB of volume at 1 watt of power from 1 meter away. 89dB is pretty loud. I rarely hit 80dB when listening to music. So, with these four Monitor 40s, I've got eight 5.25" woofers handling the mid-bass, and four tweeters handling the highs. To me, these speakers sounded great right out of the box. Some listeners report better sound as the speakers "break in." If that's the case, then they will only get better and better as time goes on. I've done some listening with just the front two speakers. The soundstage is quite wide. The detail is good without being harsh. I've not experienced any listener fatigue. These speakers are impressive as "bookshelf" speakers. The woofers can put out really decent bass all on their own without a subwoofer. Having a sub certainly helps extend the bass lower, but these speakers definitely impress with their bass output. Lots of other bookshelf speakers have a single woofer built into them. Having a pair of 5.25" woofers in each speaker gives them a little more "oomph," in my opinion. The grills are nice and do a great job of protecting the drivers. This is important to me, because I have a very active border collie that gives the word "fetch" a whole new meaning. Occasionally, an errantly thrown ball can hit the speaker, but the well-made grills prevent any damage. I have the speakers on some simple DIY speaker stands which tilt the front of each speaker up about 2 inches so that the tweeter is aimed close to my ear level when seated. Doing so with any speaker will often improve the listening experience. For the price, these speakers deliver a good quality audio experience. Sure, the sky's the limit when it comes to audio, but at $125-150 per pair, compared to similarly priced (and likely higher) products, these Polks are worth your consideration. The quality of construction is very good. They are attractive. I have one pair each of cherry and black speakers. These speakers can also be bi-wired or bi-amped. If you don't know what that is, just google it. In short, this is a method of splitting the high and low frequencies. Some persons report getting a bit better audio quality when so doing. In my case, I don't have my speakers bi-amped or bi-wired. But it might be a feature some are looking for. These speakers are worth considering. UPDATE: I wanted to upgrade my Polk Monitor 40s one step so I compared them to a pair of ELAC B6's which have received very positive reviews. My receiver is a New-Old-Stock Sansui QRX-5500 that I obtained about 2 months ago... so I have the capability of listening in 2- and 4-channel. I listen mostly to streamed music through 192Kbps Pandora One and 320Kbps Spotify Connect paid subscriptions. I use a Polk PSW505 12" subwoofer. However, while doing the A/B testing described below, I have left the sub off so just the bookshelfs were playing. My living room is my listening room, too. It's likely considered a "hard" room, with no carpet, lots of hard walls and windows, a soft couch and recliner and with no special sound treatment by me. I've had some Polk Audio Monitor 40s for about 9 months that have served as both the front mains and rear surrounds... with good results, at least to me. I got some ELAC B6 bookshelf speakers last week and have set up an A/B testing device using a Niles SPS-4 Speaker Selection System. I've been doing the A/B-ing since Thursday through to right now between the Polks and the ELACs. After reading about the ELACs I expected there to be a noticeable gain in audio quality over the Polks... but to my ears, that hasn't been the case. Since Thursday, I've listened to probably 20 hours or more and the Polks have hung in there very well compared to the ELACs. Before I go further, I'm 62 years young, have moderate to severe hearing loss augmented by use of a hearing aid. My loss is mostly in the high frequency regions. The Polks have a better, clearer, more pronounced high-frequency-end than the ELACs. Of course, this is the way my ears are hearing it. The upper frequency Polk sound, however, is not harsh or overly bright but definitely comes in as more noticeable than do the ELACs. It's almost as if the highs in the ELACs are muted to a degree. I checked and double checked that my speaker wire connections were correct. NOTE: I did some reading about speaker driver "break in" and the SCIENTIFIC view is that speaker "break in" is a myth. So, I am discounting any suggestions that the ELACs will get better over time. (Let's not go there in this post, OK?) However, the ELACs best the Polks in the bass regions, especially the lower bass. Again, the A/B testing has been done without the participation of the subwoofer. For what it's worth, the Polk cabs are about 10% larger than the ELAC cabs. Yet the ELACs have deeper bass than the Polks. If the ELAC highs are good enough for you, and you are not using a subwoofer, you may prefer the ELACs over the Polks. But once the subwoofer is introduced, then the Polks sound better to me than the ELACs. This is likely because the sub picks up the lower bass range that the Polks miss, and the Polks' high end bests the ELACs... again, to my ears. As for cosmetics, both sets of speakers look great. My Polks have the cherry finish. The ELACs come with "brushed vinyl," and they look great. It isn't trying to be wood... but it rather looks quite modern and I think attractive in appearance. The speaker connections on both sets are 5-way jobs... though I still prefer the pinch spring-loaded varieties due to the ease of connect/disconnect. The ELACs are about twice the price of the Polks currently. "Open box" and "scratch and dent" deals can save you some money. I had hopes that the ELACs would be my choice... but it ain't gonna happen. I'll be sticking with the Polks for now. I might upgrade to the Polk TSi200's since they are the heirs to the Monitor 40's and have a slightly larger cabinet. That's my take on comparing these two sets of speakers. I wouldn't even call this post a "review" of these two sets of speakers. It's just a comparison by someone whose hearing is compromised, and that "someone" is not an audiophile. I just like listening to good music over decent speakers that don't cost a fortune. As always, your mileage may vary. Thanks for reading. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2015 by Hal Nash

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.