Sigma AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS (Optical Stabilizer) Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras
Condition: Used - Very Good
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
$17.17
/ mo
Learn more
- – 6-month term
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Friday, Jul 10
Recently Viewed
Style: Nikon DSLR
Features
- 18-200mm focal length
- 27-300mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 28.8-320mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F3.5-6.3 maximum aperture; F22-40 minimum
- Micromotor-type AF motor without full-time manual focusing
- Image stabilization, Auto panning detection
- 72mm filters
- 0.45m/17.72" minimum focus
- Available in Canon EF, Nikon F (DX), Sigma SA mounts
- 18mm to 200mm high-zoom-ratio lens designed exclusively for Nikon digital SLR cameras
- 2 SLD glass elements and 2 hybrid aspherical lenses correct for all types of aberrations
- Minimum focusing distance of 45cm at all focal lengths; maximum magnification of 1:4.4
- Lens coating reduces and flare and ghost; zoom lock switch eliminates "zoom creep"
- Measures 70mm in diameter and 78.1mm long; weighs 14.3 ounces; 1-year warranty
Description
Product description Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Zoom Super Wide Angle Lens for Nikon The Sigma 18-200mm high-zoom-ratio lens is designed exclusively for Nikon digital SLR cameras and is capable of covering a wide range of focal lengths, from wide-angle to telephoto. Two Special Low Dispersion (SLD) glass elements and two hybrid aspherical lenses correct for all types of aberrations, letting Sigma house the extended-range super-zoom lens in a compact and lightweight body that measures 70mm in diameter and 78.1mm long and weighs a mere 14.3 ounces. The new lens coating, meanwhile, reduces flare and ghost--a common problem shared by many digital cameras-- while also creating an optimum color balance. Other details include a minimum focusing distance of 45cm (17.7) at all focal lengths, a high zoom ratio of 11:1, and a maximum magnification of 1:4.4. The lens design incorporates an inner focusing system that prevents the front of the lens from rotating, making it particularly suitable for using circular polarizing filters and petal-shaped lens hoods. In addition, the overall length of the lens never changes during focusing, making the lens convenient to handle and easy to use. Finally, the lens's zoom lock switch eliminates "zoom creep" during transport --a convenient addition when traveling. The lens, which includes a metal mount, is backed by a one-year warranty.
Brand: Sigma
Focal Length Description: 18-200 millimeters
Lens Type: Telephoto
Compatible Mountings: Nikon F
Camera Lens Description: 200 month
Focal Length Description: 18-200 millimeters
Lens: Telephoto
Compatible Camera Mount: Nikon F
Maximum Focal Length: 200 Millimeters
Minimum Focal Length: 18 Millimeters
Lens Design: Zoom
Focus Type: Auto Focus
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 200 Millimeters
Lens Coating Description: Coating to reduce flare and ghost
Zoom Ratio: 11.11
Image stabilization: Auto panning detection
Real Angle Of View: 69.3 Degrees
Minimum Aperture: 40
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 7
Compatible Camera Models: Nikon DSLR cameras
Photo Filter Size: 72 Millimeters
Lens Mount: Nikon F
Brand: Sigma
Camera Lens: 200 month
Model Name: Sigma AF 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS
UPC: 085126888558
Manufacturer Part Number: 888306
Global Trade Identification Number: 58
Unit Count: 1.0 Count
Model Number: 888306
Item Part Number: 888955
Item Weight: 1.34 Pounds
Manufacturer: Sigma Corporation
Built-In Media: Petal-type Lens Hood - Front & Rear Lens Caps
Maximum Shutter Speed: 30 Seconds
Exposure Control Type: Automatic
Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Media Type: ProductImage
Viewfinder Type: Optical viewfinder
Color: black
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Friday, Jul 10
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
Style: Nikon DSLR
This was shipped to my office yesterday, so I naturally had to play with it. I have an old Nikon D50, and had gotten use to the kit lens that was on it. This Sigma is CONSIDERABLY larger and heavier. I expected that of course, and maybe I'm just getting old, but IMO its a pretty hefty lens. I bought this lens expressly for the Optical Stabilization, so that was the first thing I tested. My office has a logo painted on the far side, so I handheld, indoors, at 200mm and focused on one letter. The lens setting was f6.3 at 1/30 sec. Looking side by side at the OS and non-OS shot in the camera lcd screen, they looked almost identical. However, puting them in Photoshop and blowing them up revealed a whole other story. The non-os picture was blurred - and no amount of sharpening in Photoshop could correct it. The OS picture was sharp. I'm not easily impressed, but I was really surprised at how well it worked. When I enlarged it to 200 percent in Photoshop, it seemed to be a bit soft, so I applied a small bit of sharpening from the software - and ended up with a photo that looked like it had been shot with a macro lens from 3 feet away on a tripod. It was outstanding. I bought this lens for 2 reasons. First I am a Realtor. All of my listings need indoor shots, and I stay away from flash if I can - natural light seems to create warm home interiors. Problem was, most of these shots ended up in the 1/8-1/15 range - so I packed a tripod around. This lens should be far more convenient. Second, I am a photographer. I shoot a lot of weddings and reunions, and I often try to drag the shutter, especially in churches or large halls, where I want some ambient light to fill in the background. This lens will allow me to shoot all day at 1/15 sec. with a TTL flash, and create some nice balanced portraits without the background blur found in most of these sort of images from the slow shutter speed. I have read in other reviews that this lens is slow. It is. If it were a straight lens with f6.3 at 200 mm, I wouldn't even consider it. However, the OS allows you to handhold safely at least another 2 fstops slower, so IMO, that makes up for the slow speed of the lens. Besides, it's ridiculous to compare a $500 lens to a $1700 lens in the first place. The lens also has a bit of distortion. If you primarily shoot architecture, and don't want to correct all of your images, this isn't the lens for you. I haven't noticed any lens creep yet, the zoom ring is pretty stiff, but that may change over time, and there is a lock, anyway. One major complaint I have about this lens: the focus ring is prominent, and easy to grab. TOO easy to grab. Sigma warns against turning the focus ring when you are in autofocus mode, for fear of damaging the lens. I trained myself after about 15 minutes to keep my hand off of it, but I noticed that anyone that picked up the camera had a tendency to want to turn the focus ring, thinking it was the zoom ring. If you hand this lens to someone to take your picture, be sure to instruct them how to handle it, or risk damage to the lens. The focus mechanism and OS are a bit noisy, but mostly because my ear is about 4 inches from the camera when it operates. I care very little about the noise factor. Overall, this is a great lens. Inexpensive, will probably be on your camera exclusively, and allows you to handhold the camera in low light situations. I never got to test it against Nikon's version, but the difference in price made the choice easy. I recommend this lens highly.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2008 by Victoria
Style: Nikon DSLR
I buy many products based upon reviews from other users. That is also the case with this lens. I bought my Nikon D40 about 3 months ago (after 10 years of using point and shoots, including my treasured Canon S2is super zoom), with the kit 18-55mm lens, plus I bought a Nikon 55-200mm VR lens. I love the VR lens, but traveling through Europe for 2 1/2 weeks proved to me that I HATE changing lenses. It's inconvenient and potentially contaminates the inside of the camera body. So, I started looking around at something that I could use as a single walk-around lens. I love the wide angle perspective of the 18mm end, plus needed at least 200mm for the telephoto end. I liked the idea of Tamron's 18-250mm, but it's not image stabilized, which is really essential at the telephoto end. So, back to the Sigma. I read Camera Labs review of the non-stabilized Sigma 18-200mm, and it was favorable. So, I figured that the new stabilized version would be at least as good, and probably better. I have not used this lens much over the past couple of weeks, but have found that (with a couple of exceptions), it focuses at least as quickly as the 18-55mm Nikkor kit lens, if not faster. The OS works great, making hand-held photos rock solid at 200mm. The only thing that I haven't spent a lot of time doing is taking indoor photos with it. I have taken indoor photos with the onboard flash, and they seem to work fine. I have not had much luck getting sharp photos at the telephoto end indoors, but admittedly have not tried very hard. I'll update this later, as I get more experience. Based upon what I know now, I am NOT AT ALL SORRY that I bought this lens. I was really having a hard time choosing between this and the [MUCH more expensive] Nikkor 18-200mm, but this lens seems like it is well worth the money spent. The focus/OS noise does not bother me at all (In fact, it's reassuring to hear that the camera is trying to focus, etc...). The only thing I wish Sigma had done was to make the lens Auto/Manual focus without having to move the switch from Auto to Manual, which the Nikkor can do. However, if it auto-focuses reliably, I guess it won't be a big deal. The zoom ring is a little tight right now, but I imagine that it will loosen up over time (hopefully not to the point of requiring the lock to be engaged). I also like the large manual focus ring; the Nikkor's is much smaller. Don't be put off by the 72mm diameter (which I was initially). It's not a big deal. Yes, it is quite a bit heavier and larger than the kit lens (or even my 55-200mm Nikkor), but not overly so. In fact, it makes the camera easier to hold, since I think the D40/40x/60 grip is just a little too small. I was concerned that the onboard flash will be blocked by the lens, but it seems to have no effect. I'm not seeing any shadowing. I'll keep you advised on how my ongoing review is going. Happy shooting! Update: Sept 19, 2008 - I continue to love this lens. The ONLY thing that bothers me about it is (as someone mentioned in another review) that the zoom and focus rings are too close together. When I hand this to my wife or son, I have to remind them which one is the zoom ring, and not to touch the focus (BTW - It makes a gears-are-grinding noise when you move the focus ring without moving it to manual - Not good, although it does not seem to have hurt the lens). There is a slight amount of shadowing the on board flash when you are at any zoom over the 18mm. However, I rarely if ever use the on board flash. I have a Nikon SB-400 flash that is absolutely essential inside, where you can bounce it (read Ken Rockwell's review at [...] I have not put the 18-55mm kit lens back on this camera since I have had the 18-200, and probably won't. I have a very old Nikon G model 50mm f1.8 that I can use (no metering or autofocus) on those low-light non-flash indoor shots, where the Sigma is not at it's best (although it's still very good).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2008 by Image7801
Style: Nikon DSLR
UPDATE: This lens ceased functioning 14 months after I bought it. The local repair shop could not fix it, and said it needed to go back to Sigma. Minimum repair price was $125, and likely higher than $150. Plus shipping. I changed my rating from 4 stars to 1 star because of this. I replaced it with a Nikon 28-200 that has been quite satisfactory, though I occasionally miss the extra wide reach of the Sigma. Call me an unhappy Sigma customer. ORIGINAL REVIEW: I have used this lens with my D40 for about a month. I was concerned about the relative slowness of the lens, especially at full zoom, but the OS makes up for it allowing me to shoot successfully at slower shutter speeds. Optically the lens seems fine to me. It DOES autofocus with the D40. Combined with a Sigma 30mm HSM prime lens, I have everything I need for most situations. This lens is significantly larger and heavier than the Nikon kit lenses. You will know that you have this 1-lb lens hanging around your neck! I am very satisfied with this lens. Recommended to replace both the 18-55 and 55-200 Nikon kit lenses.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on November 22, 2008 by Nataraj
Style: Nikon DSLR
I have had this lens since 9 July 2008, and used it without incident until 25 July, when the OS failed. Up to that point, I would have given this lens a five-star rating without the slightest hesitation. The distortion control, as well as the sharpness on the first sample were excellent. Furthermore, the focus was accurate to a T in all situations, including very low light. The replacement lens, which I have now used for about a week, does not have nearly the same sharpness at the edges. It is fine in very bright light, but in dimmer situations, both the sharpness, and the focussing ability, are not up to the standard of the first sample. I also find that the OS on this sample does not give the same f-stop compensation as on the first one. This said, the lens remains a good one, and I would still recommend it for use with the Nikon D40. Whether or not I will retain this one, or again request a replacement based on the less than stellar focussing ability in low light/low contrast situations remains to be seen. UPDATED 9 September 2009 I did replace the lens a second time -- under the 30 day exchange policy of Amazon. The replacement was, and is, considerably more like the first one -- with generally fine, fast and accurate focus across the range. There is a slight amount of softness, on the right-hand side. I now use this lens with a D90, as well as with the older D40, and the upgrade in camera does not in any way reveal any additional flaws in the lens. I continue to recommend this lens -- provided the sample received is a good one.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2008 by RedMtl
Style: Nikon DSLR
I bought this lens for my Nikon SLR and was very disappointed. The lens did not fit the camera correctly (I would get f-- for the f-stop) so no picture could be taken. I called Sigma and they said the only way to fix it was to ship the lens back to Sigma. They did not find anything wrong with the lens so they asked me to ship my camera to them to calibrate the camera to the lens. I was not happy because 1. shouldn't it already be calibrated if it is for a Nikon camera 2. the cost involved in shipping (with a lot of insurance) 3. being without my camera for a while 4. it could void my Nikon warranty and 5. I was going on another trip very soon. Sigma said there was no alternative so I shipped it. The total cost to send both my camera and lens to Sigma was ~$100.00 and a little over a month of time lost. I called Sigma to see if I could get a refund for my shipping costs and they totally blew me off. The lens works now but I will never buy another Sigma lens. They should tell you from the beginning that you probably will have to send your camera to get it calibrated to the lens. Is the savings that you get from buying a Sigma lens versus a Nikon lens worth the hassle? Not for me!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2010 by Jennie
Style: Nikon DSLR
I have used Sigma lenses for decades. This one covers the range from wide angle to extensive tele with reasonable image quality. Check out some of the photo gear review sites for details. Practically, I see very good resolution throughout the full range. At 18mm the corners exhibit very slight distortion, at 200mm the lens softens the image by a minute amount. Compared to its sister without optical stabilization this lens is noticeably bulkier, but I get crisp pictures in lower light gaining between two to three shutter speed steps. Since this lens is f/6.3 at 200mm I feel that the OS is positively worth the money. I rarely use any other lens anymore (besides my f/1.4 50mm Nikkor for ambient light shots).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2012 by GMan
Style: Nikon DSLR
I'm writing this review to hopefully be helpful to those lens-shopping because I know that the reviews are what I looked at the most. This is a great lens so far! I got it today, so this is the initial review. I'll update later on to add more comments! I have a Nikon D3100. - The build is great! A metal mount makes it feel so sturdy. I had read that some lenses of equal size that had plastic mounts, had just snapped and fallen off the body. I don't feel like I need to worry about that. - The lens is big. It weighs more than I'm used to but I like it. The lens is big and it causes a huge shadow when using the built in flash. I'm kind of disappointed in this. I'll have to go external flash shopping soon. - The fine focus ring and the zoom ring are very similar in size but it's nothing you can't get used to. - The autofocus seems to be working well. Pretty much equal to my Nikon kit 18-55mm lens. It does not like low light settings; it's been hunting a lot. However, my 18-55mm Nikkor did a ton of hunting in low light situations also. There is a AF and MF switch, like on the Nikkor 18-55mm. - The OS seems to be working well. You still have to a have a nice steady hand, but it works well. There is a ON-OFF switch, like on the Nikkor 18-55mm. It seems to be about the same quality as Nikkor. - There is a lens creep, but it doesn't really bother me much as of right now. There is a lock that holds it in place at 18mm for when you're walking around with it around your neck. It really isn't that bad of a creep. - The zoom is fabulous. It has such a wide range which I what I bought it for. I have a feeling it will be great for travel. I'm going to Ireland, England and Wales in 2 months and this will be my ultimate walk-around lens. - The quality seems identical to my Nikkor 18-55mm. The images are sharp, when in focus. (I've only been in a low setting and it's having a few issues). They're sharp at 18mm and equally sharp at 200mm. - It comes with a flower hood, which I like having on the lens at all times. Adorama did a great job on shipping. Arrived safely and earlier than Amazon had predicted!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2012 by D Shepard
Style: Nikon DSLR
I am not a pro but sure have more confidence with this lense. I used it to replace a non-VR 70-300. I love it! You have read other reviews and specs that note that this is a heavy lense. Guess what? It is - so don't buy it then trash it because of such - it also is round :). I rolled the dice in a decision over this or the Nikon. The money was just right and I am super glad of my decision. The first big shoot was bridal portrait. We were very pleased with the results (especially compared to overall pics from the non-vr replaced). We shot around 400 pix, and I was exhausted at the end from holding the camera, lense and SB600 flash unit). The setup is heavy but I think I like the feel better than lighter (feeling cheaper). It also comes with the option of extending the warranty (paperwork was in my lense box). So, while not a perfect fit for anyone, if you are a newbie like me just happy to have something that is at lest "close" to a real camera (working with a D40x) this is a good route. Cheers!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2009 by JerryP