Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon Digital DSLR Camera
Condition: Used - Very Good
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Zip, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Wednesday, Jul 29
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
Features
- 70-200mm focal length, Minimum focus Distance - 1.40m/55.1 inch
- 105-300mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 112-320mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F2.8 constant maximum aperture; F22 minimum, Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing
- Image stabilization, 4 stops claimed. Dual mode, normal and panning
- 77mm filters, Available in Canon EF, Nikon F (FX), Pentax KAF3, Sony Alpha, Sigma SA mounts
Description
SIGMA 70-200MM LENS CANON F/2.8 LARGE TELEPHOTO LENS
Brand: Sigma
Focal Length Description: 70-200 millimeters
Lens Type: Telephoto
Compatible Mountings: Canon EF
Camera Lens Description: Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon Digital DSLR Camera See more
Focal Length Description: 70-200 millimeters
Lens: Telephoto
Compatible Camera Mount: Canon EF
Maximum Focal Length: 200 Millimeters
Minimum Focal Length: 70 Millimeters
Lens Design: Zoom
Focus Type: Ring-type ultrasonic
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 200 Millimeters
Lens Coating Description: Flush Coating
Zoom Ratio: 2.861
Image stabilization: 4 stops claimed. Dual mode, normal and panning
Real Angle Of View: 34.3 Degrees
Maximum Aperture: 2.8 Millimeters
Minimum Aperture: 22 Millimeters
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
Compatible Camera Models: Canon EOS series
Photo Filter Size: 82 Millimeters
Lens Mount: Canon EF
Has Self-Timer: No
Exposure Control Type: Automatic, Manual
Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Media Type: ProductImage, EnhancedContent
Color: Black
Brand: Sigma
Camera Lens: Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon Digital DSLR Camera
Model Name: 589101
UPC: 785528749678 085126589547 785528749715
Manufacturer Part Number: 589101
Global Trade Identification Number: 47
Unit Count: 1.0 Count
Model Number: 589101
Item Part Number: 589954
Item Weight: 1430 Grams
Item Type Name: Digital-slr-camera-lenses.
Manufacturer: Sigma Corporation of America
Built-In Media: Lens
Warranty Description: 4 Years
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Wednesday, Jul 29
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- Zip Pay in 4
- Financing through Apple Pay
- Financing through Google Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
I loved this lens, but I had to return it. Why 5 stars? Well, it's everything I hoped it to be. Incredible sharpness, fast aperture, and $1000 less than the Canon for a [reportedly] very slight decrease in quality. Why did I return it? Two reasons, it's too bulky to travel/have fun with, and I don't need f/2.8. On the first point, I'm well built @ 175lbs 6', and 28 years old. Strong enough to lug around 3.5 pounds. But for my style of photography - hanging out with friends, photographing family, fly-on-the-wall type stuff - it was just too damn big. Every time I pulled it out, I felt like Christoph Waltz in Inglorious Basterds, casually and awkwardly unsheathing out my huge pipe. I also have a bad back, and I'll be damned if 3.5 pounds at a weird backpack angle doesn't wear me out. Your mileage may vary on this point, but for me, the cost/benefit didn't make sense. On the subject of f/2.8 - I don't have kids, I don't have indoor soccer games to photograph, generally no indoor events where speed at this focal range would be useful (e.g., a house - you have to be across a large room or down a hall for 70-200 to make sense on an APS-C)... I just have no need for it. I convinced myself prior to buying this that I wanted the best, and this is certainly it. But after playing around with it for a few weeks, I realized that I don't need the f/2.8 and I don't need the weight. I ended up with the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS USM. It's a nice lens, way lighter, less conspicuous, and reportedly sharper (though I can't tell the difference). I also tried the 70-300 f/4.0 - 5.6, and it was OK, but felt too cheap. It was also noticeably less sharp when compared side-by-side with the Sigma & Canon. One last note - I ordered all of these lenses used but 'Like New' from Amazon Warehouse. The lenses I received were in almost-perfect condition, so I highly recommend exploring the "used" options from Amazon Warehouse. That said, when I finally decided on the Canon 70-200 f/4L IS USM, I bought it via Amazon Warehouse. They shipped the non-IS version to me, which is worth about half of what I paid. I calmly but firmly called Amazon, and they agreed to refund full return shipping costs, as well as overnight a brand new 70-200 f/4L IS USM to me, which I received the very next day. To be clear, I paid full price for the f/4L IS, though I saved 7% due to a running promotion - 4% off camera equipment, plus 3% cash back from the Amazon Visa. So it ended up costing the same as the used version due to the savings! But anyway, Amazon agreed to waive the overnight shipping fee on the replacement, which was awesome, so that felt pretty fair. All-in-all, if you are sure that you need f/2.8 and that 3.5 lbs isn't a big deal, then buy this thing and don't look back.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2013 by N. Bledsoe
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
I am not a pro, just an avid enthusiast who loves Canon Cameras and products. I make NO MONEY on my photos, just like to take great photos of my family and friends. I was set on buying the Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II ($2100) then I seen this lens at my local camera rental store. The shop owner had nothing but good things to say about the Sigma and let me sample both Canon and Sigma 70-200 2.8 lenses and encouraged me to use one over the weekend. I took the sigma to see what the hype was about. I WAS BLOWN AWAY!!! I took over 1000 shots over the weekend, had a few events so I made good use of it, and I was thoroughly impressed. If you have kids who play sports, the Sigma lens does the trick. The auto focus was lightning fast and I was able to track my subjects easily and swiftly. The 2.8 F-stop lead to great Bokeh which the recipients of the photos were pleased and commented "looks professional". Performance: Great quick auto focus, clean and crisp shots. Some slight vignetting at the edges mostly noticed at 200mm. The focus and zoom ring are switched (compared to the normal Canon Lens set up) the zoom ring is near the front lens, focus ring towards the camera (this took some getting used to). Its a bit heavy for long shoots but it helps you beef up your left arm. So far no complaints except from my wife who is embarrassed when I bust out this big bad boy at my kid's events (I think its cool) Oh well, the photos speak for themselves. Bottom line- If you got the money or making money, spend the money and get the Canon. If you are like me and have regular bills, a family, and just want to take great photos of them without dipping into their college fund, the SIGMA is a great and sensible choice. Stabilization noise: You can hear it activating when you are shooting, but your ear is inches away from it. Some people grumble about the noise, I don't really pay attention to it that much, its not that bad. My Canon 70-300mm (non L) makes similar sounds too. PROS: Great Price, affordable Fast Auto-Focus Great Stability Control Sturdy Build Quality Made in Japan (this was a big pro to me) CONS: Not weather sealed Heavy (but so is the Canon) You still may have Lens Envy Black finish did make the lens warmer in the sun (didn't see a drop in performance though) I included some sample photos I took comparing the Canon vs Sigma. I used the respective lens to shoot the opponent lens (canon 6d). They both looked great to me, but like I said, I'm not a pro. The other two photos are with the SIGMA 70-200 2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS at a local pub using the Canon 6D
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2015 Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2015 by GANBATEKUDASAI
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
I caught the photography bug (again). I have a Canon 60D body and slowly regaining my collection of lenses. I have a Sigma 50mm which I got due to the great reviews. Initially I was skeptical on the Sigma brand but now I feel more confident with Sigma so I ordered the Sigma 70-200 I also have a Canon 100mm macro and a tokina 11-24. I've been hunting around recently on craigslist waiting for the opportunity to get my hands on one of these lenses but everyone is saturating the market with the non OS version of this lens. I had to pick up this lens, I've had it in my amazon shopping cart for a couple weeks already just waiting for amazon to carry the lens so I can take advantage of the awesome 3.99 1 day shipping (I LOVE AMAZON PRIME.) Here are my thoughts on this lens after extensive shooting throughout the day. Bokeh : 5 Stars This lens has incredible bokeh, at 9 aperture blades, it really blows the background quite nicely with beautiful bokeh balls. I love how it really brings out my subject. Construction Quality: 4 Stars The construction quality on this lens is good but not excellent. The overall feel is solid, the barrel of the lens is made of hard plastic. The focus and zoom rings have the same textured feel of the O.G sigma brand. It looks a bit awkward but unique at the same time. Even though the construction of the lens is made of plastic, it feels durable and not something you have to baby. Optical Stabilization: 3 Stars This is too bad. For the extra amount you are paying for this lens vs the non OS version, I really don't think the extra 400 dllrs is really worth it. I tried both modes and none of them really make you say OH WOW! I've had some image stabilized lenses made by Canon and I did not get that excitement as I had with those lenses. Let's just say for comparisons sake, the "Optical Stabilization" is half of that in a IS in a L lens, still useful to a certain degree though. Auto Focus: 5 Stars The first thing I did with the lens is test the auto focus, I wanted to make sure that it is in sync with the auto focusing points of my Canon body. It kept up quite nicely and it didn't search for my focus points even during low light conditions within reason. I really enjoy the focusing mechanism on this lens albeit a bit on the loud side. Image Quality: 5 Stars For the cost of the lens, the elements within it provide a great end result on your images. Sure, there's some miniscule CA in some focal ranges but you really need to blow the image up to see such artifacting. The images that I have taken thus far are great and I have no complaints in this category. Sharp images, great contrast along with the bokeh at 2.8 and it will make you smile. This is my short review of the lens, take it for what its worth and I hope to see this lens in the hands of those who are skeptical on the Sigma brand. Be a pioneer, this lens will be a great additional to the serious amateur, not for the professional though - stay with your white lenses and red rings.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2011 by gomz
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
So I used to own the Canon 70-200 2.8 II, and it took amazingly sharp images... and was an all around GREAT lens. I sold it to get the 5D Mark iii, and have never regretted that. But I needed the reach of a 200 and thought that I could compromise with this lens. Going in, I never expected it to be equal to the Canon, (as it was less than half the price). I have been impressed that the shots I took were pretty good. I did have some soft images, but part of that was my own fault for not turning off IS while it was on a tripod. (smacks forehead). Anyways, the lens has done well in my limited use, and I will update this once I have used it more. I am impressed with it's reach and hand held usability. Yes it is heavy, but any lens this size will be. So far so good. (even with the 2x extention)
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 7, 2014 by R. Ray
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
My images are sharp, can I compare it to the Canon L glass? No. I have not shot anything with one. But I did some homework for a couple of months, reading online reviews, seeing sample images and finally decided to pull the trigger and get the Sigma. This is my second Sigma lens. I am shooting a APS-C sensor camera and my overall experience with Sigma is outstanding with this 70-200 being the absolute standout. No focusing issues. I am using it to shoot my daughters travel basketball team and wish I would have done it sooner. I've used it both indoors and out (early spring). I absolutely love this lens and am more than satisfied with the results. The fact that it comes with a hood (and APS-C hood adapter, that I have not used), tripod collar, and a carry case (not that I will use it much if at all) makes what you get from this lens dollar for dollar over the Canon makes it a steal for an amateur/hobbyist like me. Great sharp images, nice "blown out" backgrounds (bokeh), fast focus, excellent image stabilization with handheld shots. Focus ring and zoom ring work well and it has full time manual unlike the other Sigma EX lens I own (again, I still like that lens too, that's my only real gripe with the 17-50mm). Sure, it is not weather proof, but I have little need for a rain proof lens for my needs. Others may want to step up to the Canon L, but remember, no hood or tripod collar is included with the Canon (not sure why, really). Affordability did factor into my decision as well. Sure, based on what I read and saw, the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM is better, but is it $1200+ better? For someone that wants better pictures, has a family, and a budget, I really don't think you can go wrong with this glass on any mount (Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Sony, or Sigma).
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2012 by SithTracy
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
The auto focus would not work from the second I got it out of the box; it just clicked indefinitely searching for focus. I contacted Sigma customer support and they advised me that the lens was most likely damaged internally during shipping. I explained that the box the item was shipped in, the lens box, and the lens itself were all in excellent condition; neither box showed any sign of damage at all. The lens was also securely inside the cushioned carrying case provide by Sigma. Although I have heard amazing things about this lens from my friends I cannot help but to be severely disappointed in what is supposed to be a high quality lens.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 18, 2015 by swd
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
For the first few times I have used this lens, it was fantastic. It was my favorite lens. After only a couple uses, the lens AF capability completely stopped. I can no longer take photos in the AF setting. It will only work in the manuel focus setting, which is not ideal for sports, fast moving objects, and other events that it may be used for. Buy this from Amazon at your own risk.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2025 by Kelly
Style: Canon Digital DSLR Camera
After being interested in photography for a long time and on a limited budget most of that time I finally took the plunge for what I believed a decent lens. Now after a few weeks of using this lens I wonder two things; 1. why did I think this was only a 'decent lens and 2. why in the world of jiggly sports did I wait so bloody long to buy it? I am in no way a professional photographer but this lens' operation (range and focus rings) is like spreading warm butter on toast, S - M- O - O - T - H and wonderfully balanced on the Canon 7D. I first found it heavy in comparison to the lenses I had already and was used to using. On a Canon 7D 'C' size sensor I effectively have a 112-320mm lens by multiplying by 1.6 the lens' 70-200. More reach but not sacrificing quality in either lens or photos taken. Sigma packages a lens hood for standard sensor and an extender hood for smaller sensors, tripod ring (placed at a good balance point), a case large enough for both hoods and lens with filter should you use filters and for less than the manufacturer's lens does. These were my final deciding factors in buying Sigma's 70-200 over the comparable Canon (who charges for tripod ring, hood etc. extra). My lens is fast, quiet and takes excellent photos when the operator does everything correctly. In my case operator error is the primary cause of photos being out of focus, camera/lens shake or just forgetting what I'm doing. Call it Old Timers Disease, I do. Sigma's site prices are prohibitive to my budget but finding it on Amazon with a UV filter was in my budget. I do have a Sigma 70-300 OS lens and it too is peaches and cream, just a bit slow for early mornings low light, hand held. My experiences with both Amazon and Sigma are nothing but good so far and I am both pleased and would recommend both to others. My lens came in an expeditious way with signature required due to the cost of said lens, an excellent policy. My next major expense is the Sigma 150- 500mm lens followed by the 105 macro. It has been my experience in life to go with what works well for me and stick with it as long as it works. Thats my story and I'm sticking with it. Colour me a happy camper regarding this lens, it's performance and price.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on November 17, 2011 by Kenneth L.