Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Jun 27 – Jun 29
Recently Viewed
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
Features
- 50mm focal length
- 75mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 80mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F1.4 maximum aperture; F16 minimum
- Ring-type ultrasonic-type AF motor with full-time manual focusing
- 77mm filters.Angle of View (35mm):46.8
- Aperture Range: f/1.4 to f/16.
- Hyper Sonic AF Motor.
- Three Special Low Dispersion Elements.
- Floating System & Large Diameter Design
- Compatible with Sigma USB Dock.
Description
SIGMA 50MM A LENS F1.4 DG HSM CANON EF MT
Brand: Sigma
Focal Length Description: 50
Lens Type: Standard
Compatible Mountings: Canon EF
Camera Lens Description: 50 millimetres
Focal Length Description: 50
Lens: Standard
Compatible Camera Mount: Canon EF
Maximum Focal Length: 50 Millimeters
Minimum Focal Length: 50 Millimeters
Lens Design: Prime
Focus Type: Ring-type ultrasonic
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 50 Millimeters
Lens Coating Description: multi-layer coating
Zoom Ratio: 1
Image stabilization: no image stabilization
Real Angle Of View: 46.8 Degrees
Maximum Aperture: 1.4 f
Minimum Aperture: 16
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
Compatible Camera Models: Canon EOS
Photo Filter Size: 77 Millimeters
Lens Mount: Canon EF
Brand: Sigma
Camera Lens: 50 millimetres
Model Name: 311101
UPC: 085126311544
Manufacturer Part Number: 311101
Global Trade Identification Number: 44
Unit Count: 1.0 Count
Model Number: 311101
Item Weight: 1.25 Pounds
Item Type Name: Digital-slr-camera-lenses.
Manufacturer: Sigma Corporation of America
Built-In Media: Lens
Warranty Description: Manufacturer
Has Self-Timer: No
Exposure Control Type: Manual
Water Resistance Level: Not Water Resistant
Media Type: ProductImage
Color: Black
Screen Size: 3 Inches
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Jun 27 – Jun 29
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
As others here and the almost universal praise this lens has received from the professional reviewers have all said, this lens is astonishing. The Sigma team has been making remarkable lenses now for many years often filling niches left empty by other third party lens makers and the OEM ones as well. A good example of a niche lens from Sigma only available from it is the 'Bigma' a 50-500mm big mama bazooka with a range not found anywhere else. Here the target was the Otus from Carl Zeiss and the target is not only hit but superseded if you consider the addition of AF to be of value to you. It exists here but not in the Otus. So many today rely on AF that in all likelihood, the Otus would be a poor choice for many even if costing 1/2 of the Art. In fact, it costs four times as much. The special part of this lens is that it retains its optical quality no matter the aperture chosen. Even at f1.4 there is almost no loss of edge quality with only a slight decrease in contrast which itself is easily fixed in post assuming you can detect it. I can but only on test snaps. In real world use I see no fall off. However, and this is very important, this lens is not magic. Once stopped down to f4, it performs about where the lesser cost Sigma 50mm f1.4 standard lens does. Sure, this probably would blow away the standard in an optical test but as far as real world use, the difference won't be enough to make or break an image or any image I can think of anyway. Worse, the inherent sharpness of this lens, especially if coupled to an ultra high rez body like the D810, will mean any trivial error in technique will scream out in the finished image. This is a very serious lens and it demands great expertise in use - just as the higher rez bodies from Sony and Nikon demand now and maybe some year, Canon will demand someday Real Soon Now. Yes, I"m a Canon shooter. If your work will fall into ranges where you'll be using apertures between f1.4 and f4 so you can live with the thin DOF AND you demand only the highest quality images, then this lens or the Otus is your lens. If you wish AF, then it's the Sigma or nothing. However, if you work using normal apertures of f4 to f16, (especially above f8) then this lens will bring you nothing much added to justify the added cost of 2x the lesser cost Sigma or the OEM 5Xmm f1.4 offerings. In the case of Canon, there is the f1.2 which is highly specialized so if you wish this trade of very thin DOF but can accept its serious limitations, then you know who you are. I am glad I got this lens. It's a keeper for me but I'm a tech quality screwball who almost always works from a tripod. For many folks, this lens is a trophy lens but not needed over lesser cost offerings from Sigma and other manufacturers.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on August 15, 2014 by Paul Cassel
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
I have spent a lot of times with 50mm lenses. From the 50 f/2 on my film SLR, to the Canon 50mm f/1.8, then the Canon 50mm f/1.4. I love the versatility of 50mm, and the shallow depth of field that can be had with the wide apertures. So when I read reviews on this lens, I knew it had to replace my Canon 50mm 1.4. The Canon is good. Not great, but good. Sharp. Fast. Terrible at f/1.4. Ok at f/1.6. Starts to get good at f/2.0. It's noisy when focusing, and the minimum focus distance isn't great. The Sigma improves on all of these things, a tremendous amount. Super sharp, even at f/1.4. I have never used a sharper lens. It's crazy. Even the corners are sharper than the canon was at the center! And this is on a full frame camera. The focus is fast and quiet. It did need a few adjustments to be spot on. The Sigma dock and about a half hour dialed everything in nicely. I really like the ability to set different focal adjustments at different subject differences. I needed that, as everything but the closest distance was off, and by differing amounts. I also like that it has a pretty close minimum focusing distance. Still not macro, of course, but an extra 4 inches over the Canon makes a huge difference when trying to compose up close. The only knock is how big and heavy this is for a 50mm f/1.4. It's about twice as big as the canon, and over twice as heavy. Makes walking around with it definitely more noticeable. But I'm a big guy. I sometimes walk around with the sigma 150-600. So this is a cake walk compared to that. I will certainly be buying more into Sigma's art line after this. Update: I have been using this lens more than any other lens in my bag, and I wish I could give it 6 stars. It's easily my go to lens for walking around. Normally I go with a zoom lens for the versatility while walking, but it's hard to pass on the sharpness of this amazing piece of glass. I have attached a few photos that show off this lens.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2017 Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2017 by Mike Vande Ven Jr.
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
I've had this lens for a week now and it is very good quality! Can't complain with the sharpness, or the focus. Didn't even need to buy that silly USB Dock... Mainly because I did Micro-AF adjustments in my camera (Canon 5D Mark II) and those adjustments were good enough for me (though lens snobs may have you think other wise :p) People who have complained about the accuracy of focus may just not be used to working with a such a shallow depth of field (The nature of a F-1.4 Lens). Once you get the hang of it, you'll find this lens very useful in low light situations. It also produces some wonderful Bokeh Balls ;-) There are a few cons though. NO weather sealing. NO Image Stabilization (but neither does the canon L50 1.2). & it's heavy (1.8 pounds) if you aren't used to shooting with the canon L70-200mm 2.8 lens (2.8-3 pounds) All in all, i'm very happy with this lens for it's versatile, well constructed, and produces great images which is all you could look for in a lens... right?
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2016 Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2016 by Bryan Star
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
Love this lens. When I replaced my zoom kit lens with this one it was night and day... like using a different camera altogether. That zoom lens has never made its way back to my camera. The only zoom used here is my feet and the Photoshop crop tool. I am using this with a Canon D70, which means with the 1.6x crop factor, this is the equivalent of an 80-85mm lens. For film purposes, the large size of the lens with the huge focal ring is an advantage if you are doing continuous manual focus. For people with a strong, steady hand, the weight is not a big deal and can help keep things steady if no stand or steadicam equipment on hand. As mentioned by another reviewer, this kind of extreme sharpness in a lens is a tradeoff from the desired bokeh that portraiture photogs like. I bought this for making short films, so the sharpness and lack of prutty bokeh is a plus for me. I don't necessarily need pretty glowey faces in a tense Tarantino-esque scene that turns into a shootout. I need the characters to pop in contrast to the background, and I want to see their ugly pimples and all. Having said that, first thing I learned from experimenting with this lens is the value of taking pictures in raw. A few adjustments when importing into Photoshop, and you can make the pictures soft if you need to using the initial import screen. See examples. When you are getting this much information through the lens, you have a lot of versatility and options as to how you use it. So even if you are a glamour or portaiture photog, I would not be too quick to dismiss it. I am so paranoid about getting dust or scratches on this investment, that I leave my Tiffen circular polarizer on full time, even indoors. Indoors the polarizer is great for reducing light bouncing off shiny foreheads or cheeks (choose your poison). I also like the deeper, richer colors the polarizer seems to give. On the autofocus, I probably should use it more, but I am never quite happy with it, sometimes to my own chagrin, as I don't always get it right when taking pictues. The Canon D70 has continual auto focus with video, and I have test it and it does work good enough with this lens for commercial purposes. It is quiet, although, if you are using it for professional use, you should be using a wireless lavalier and boom combo. For short films, I don't know, I would say it depends on how short staffed and short on time we are. It is definitely great to have that option. Several years ago it was not available on cameras below 3,000 . Overall I am happy with my purchase and feel I made the right decision for what I will be using it for. I am going to save up for the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Telephoto Zoom, known for good everything including sweet bokeh, so I imagine these two lenses will be the only ones I need when going out to do a guerilla shoot. Not doing weddings, so no need to carry 8 crappy lenses.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2014 Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2014 by B. Walter Finn
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
I bought this lens to replace my Canon 50 1.4, and decided on the Sigma over the Canon 1.2L. The Canon 1.2 is much more expensive, MUCH slower to focus, and, IMO, less sharp. I’m using it on an EOS R and a 5D mkiii and I couldn’t be more satisfied with the build quality, image quality, af speed. The one drawback is a lack of weather-sealing on the mount, which is not a dealbreaker. I have to mention the color/contrast rendering. Processing photos from this lens will throw you because the RAW files are nearly perfect (IMO). RAW are usually flat and benefit from a bit of adjustment. The files out of this lens (I shoot an mkiii and R) are full of contrast and rich color.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on October 18, 2019 by Noah Gallagher
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
I'm primarily a wedding and portrait photographer. 50mm on a full-frame camera is right around where you can start to get into formal portraits without requiring a ton of space. Or to put it into a more practical example, it's a great focal length for taking care of those cocktail hour post-ceremony/pre-reception family photos. 35mm is too wide, and will stretch out the people on the edges, and while I love the look of 85mm, it'll have you running back and forth too much. It's the Honda Civic of focal lengths, and with good reason. This particular lens right away has a really great feel to it. The focusing ring turns smoothly, with just the right amount of damping. The polycarbonate body has a subtle sheen to it, but does not feel slippery or sprayed-on. It's incredibly easy to engage, and while it does have a bit of weight to it, it's pretty much what you should expect when dealing with premium-quality lenses. It's heavy because it's full of glass. If weight is a concern, just buy the Canon 50mm f/1.4. Compared with the Canon f/1.2, the Sigma is sharper, no doubt. Especially once you start stopping down the aperture, the fidelity I was able to pick out on clothing details and in eyes blew me away. The Canon 50mm f/1.2 has the important distinction, however, of having *that* look. You're not going to get the look of that particular lens without using that particular lens. The focus falloff and color rendering is just that unique, and the Sigma excels at producing a clean image, not necessarily emulating its competitors. I used both, and ended up with the Sigma. AF speed isn't mind-bendingly quick. In a dark environment, you still get to sit there and watch it hunt around a bit, but it's not going to hold up a session. If you're in the type of setting where the AF is having trouble, you're probably using a flash... and if you're using a flash, it hopefully has an AF-assist beam on it. That type of magic definitely helps a lot here. My lens required no adjustments to calibrate it to my camera. I found the same to be true with the 35mm f/1.4, which is an amazing event and landscape lens. All in all, this is a tremendous value, and if you're shooting outdoor senior portraits, you could probably go quite far with nothing but a high-quality 50mm. It simply beats the pants off of anything else out there right now, and I'm looking forward to future ART releases.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on October 2, 2014 by Jeff Bisti
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
Used for a couple years and EXCELLENT quality and build.
Reviewed in the United States on October 30, 2025 by Shanna
Style: Canon
Set: US Version
Update: 9-3-14 This lens is still my favorite 50, but the back focusing has become a slight concern. I shot the Sigma Art consistently throughout a wedding, and during the reception, it back focused almost 50% of the time. To get an idea of how dark it was, I was shooting at 1/80th, ISO3200, and f/1.4. I realized it's a dark room, but still. My canon didn't back focus near this much. Still five stars for me, as I am absolutely stunned at the sharpness of the images I get and beautiful, natural contrast it produces. Whenever I'm about to purchase one of two comparable lenses, (if I don't already own one) I buy both on separate credit cards and do a side-by-side test. I've uploaded the photo for you to see. I am a professional wedding photographer, I own two 5D3's and two 6D's, as well as every prime lens Canon makes from the 14 to the 100, and my zoom is a 70-200 2.8 IS. I don't care if my lenses are Canon made, I only want the sharpest and best for my clients. I've owned the 50L for two years now, and was pretty excited when Sigma announced their 50art. Out of the box, it's a long lens. Way longer than the L, with a 77mm filter thread as well. Totally unexpected for a 50mm lens. I tested my lenses without any UV filters on them, and by far, the Sigma was sharpest. Better contrast, better color, and sharper than the Canon L. Here's what seemed a little odd to me: In my test, I stopped down to F/8, and while it was still superior to Canon's 50, it almost looked...noisier at the same ISO! Very strange to me, and I'm not sure why. It is still a better image, but I can't explain why the same camera body at the same settings wouldn't produce the same noise level. Huh. The Sigma backfocuses a little bit more than the Canon in a dimly lit room, but this isn't a major concern to me. Yet. I have yet to test this at a wedding, but I've taken several photos inside my own home, and, while faster to lock focus than the Canon, if the Sigma backfocused, the Canon won. As far as sharpness, everything you've read so far is true. Lines are more clear, contrast is more defining, and if I had to label the Canon with one word, it would be "soft". Never before this lens would I have said that about the Canon, but Sigma knocked it out of the park. I'm proud to have this in my arsenal, and can't wait to deliver the images it produces to my brides and grooms. Chromatic Abberation is almost nonexistent, and something I found totally strange but incredible: I could not get the lens to flare. Not even shooting directly at the sun. I was pretty amazed. I hope this review helps, and I hope the photo helps as well.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2014 Reviewed in the United States on July 13, 2014 by Jared