Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
/ mo
Learn more
- – Up to 36-month term if approved
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Zip, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
FREE 30-day refund/replacement
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Only 9 left in stock, order soon!
Arrives
Sunday, Jul 26
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
Features
- Offers stable and fine image quality from wide to mid-telephoto range
- This lens has a combination of fixed aperture and a good zoom ratio that is kept as high as possible
- minimum focusing distance of 45cm and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:4.6. great for close up photography
- MC-11 Compatible
Description
24-105mm F4.0 DG OS HSM
Brand: Sigma
Focal Length Description: 24-105 millimeters
Lens Type: Telephoto
Compatible Mountings: Nikon F (FX)
Camera Lens Description: 105 millimetres
Focal Length Description: 24-105 millimeters
Lens: Telephoto
Compatible Camera Mount: Nikon F (FX)
Maximum Focal Length: 105 Millimeters
Minimum Focal Length: 24 Millimeters
Lens Design: Zoom
Focus Type: Ring-type ultrasonic
Lens Fixed Focal Length: 105 Millimeters
Zoom Ratio: 4.421
Image stabilization: Yes
Real Angle Of View: 84.1 Degrees
Maximum Aperture: 4 f
Minimum Aperture: 22
Number of Diaphragm Blades: 9
Compatible Camera Models: Nikon
Lens Mount: Nikon F
Has Self-Timer: No
Compatible Devices: DSLR Camera
Maximum Shutter Speed: 30 Seconds
Exposure Control Type: Automatic
Media Type: ProductImage
Color: Black
Screen Size: 3 Inches
Brand: Sigma
Camera Lens: 105 millimetres
Model Name: 635306
UPC: 779177653752 085126930271 085126635558
Manufacturer Part Number: 635955
Global Trade Identification Number: 52
Unit Count: 1.0 Count
Model Number: 635955
Item Weight: 885 Grams
Item Type Name: Digital-slr-camera-lenses.
Manufacturer: Sigma Corporation of America
Built-In Media: LENS
Warranty Description: 4 Years
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Sunday, Jul 26
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- Zip Pay in 4
- Financing through Apple Pay
- Financing through Google Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
I've had this lens for a month or so now. I took it to Tokyo and Kyoto on a trip and took nearly 1000 shots with it. I must say, I am thoroughly impressed with this lens. The image quality is superb. I shoot with a Nikon D7100, and it is very sharp corner to corner on a DX body from 24-80mm. Above that to 105, image quality may start to soften slightly, but it's negligible. I've never shot the Canon 24-105 or the Nikon 24-120 to be honest, but after extensive research and reviews, I settled on this over the Nikon 24-120, and I'm very happy with it. The build quality is tops. The lens is a bit on the heavy side, but you're getting quality glass, and I had no issues carrying it around all day with my BlackRapid sling. A couple things to be aware of... first, the lens focuses backward (counterclockwise, like Canon) compared to the normal Nikon clockwise focusing fashion. It was a little weird at first but you get used to it, no biggie at all. Second, there's been reported issues with Sigma lenses and the Nikon D7100 (and maybe other Nikon's as well) concerning image review. With the Sigma lens attached, you cannot hold the arrow button down to pan around an image for review, it requires clicking each time. Also, if you have a screen timeout set for 4 seconds, the image review will stay on for about 1 minute with this lens on. Once a Nikon lens is put on, your image review functions go back to normal, even when looking at images taken with the Sigma lens. It's a known issue, and apparently Sigma isn't planning to release a firmware update for it (I have no idea why...). It's a minor nuisance, and in my opinion, the quality of the lens outweighs those cons. I'll be interested to see if the problem persists with my new D610 when it arrives. Regardless, I still think the lens is a very worthy standard zoom that can outclass both the Nikon 24-85 and the 24-120 in both image quality and construction quality, and also the aging Canon 24-105! Do yourself a favor and check one out!
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2014 by Justin
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
I'm a Nikon-shooting wedding photographer. I bought this because I needed a replacement for my hardy Nikkor 24-70mm 2.8 while it was out being repaired (it's been shooting HARD for 6 years), and I could always use an extra wide angle (my wife shares my equipment). So here's what I found: Excellent focusing, even in the dark. The Nikkor 24-70 would give me soft-focus issues every once in a while, but NOT the Sigma. The Sigma is sharper than the Nikkor 24-70 at every aperture, and would have a little more contrast and slightly poppier colors. It DOES vignette often in the telephoto range, but I personally LIKE that look, so I won't complain about it. Just know that it's there. The f/4 aperture might put some people off, but honestly, if you're shooting wide-angle, do you really need a wider aperture for most circumstances? Probably not. If you're a natural light shooter, I can see it causing problems - especially on older bodies where you can't crank up the ISO to compensate for the aperture. On a shallower note, this is a beautiful lens. It's just so freakin' well crafted and beautiful to look at. It's got a nice weight to it, and just oozes quality glass - something I'd never thought I'd mention in a review. The weight might be a problem for some, but this is a professional lens - you kinda have to expect it to be heavy. In conclusion, this lens is a great buy. Great all purpose focal lengths, decent constant aperture, impeccable focusing, and handsome to boot. I prefer this lens over my Nikkor 24-70, and it's half the price. Kind of a no-brainer.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2015 by LostJohnny
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
I just want to start by saying I was highly iffy about this lens. I’ve heard so many great reviews about sigma art lens, but I’ve also heard horribly stories about it’s focusing issues. Thankfully, because of this quarantine I’ve had ALOT of time to read countless reviews, comments and scores from reputable sites like DxOMark. With all that being said. If you are in the market for a workhorse lens. This is it. I primarily shoot with primes. I love them, but sometimes having that extra reach help. You don’t always have time to switch lens or “zoom with your feet.” That’s where a lens like this comes in handy. After a few weeks with this lens I can see no reason why that anybody from a “professional photographer” to a weekend warrior couldn’t benefit from this lens. It is very sharp, durable and unlike its art counterparts I did not need the usb dock to fix its focusing issues. Do not let the 4f scare you away. This is a must have lens. I shoot with a few Nikons and this is my second copy of this lens. The only thing I will suggest is that it is a bit heavy so be weary of that fact. I am also a fitness addict so the weight doesn’t bother me but I could see it posing a problem long term. Other than that I think you will love. Btw my two close friends shoot with both the Nikon and canon equivalent and both have agreed it is sharper and worth every penny.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2020 Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2020 by Leslie
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
The quality and hardware I found not to be durable. Only one flight and the lense split open n I packed it well. Also the lense vignettes pretty bad
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2016 by AWTRAVEL54
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
Don't get me wrong, the lens is excellent, but it isn't amazing like the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 APS-C lens or the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 lens. Perhaps one cannot expect miracles from a more than 4x lens. Nonetheless, the lens is noticeably better than my 24-85G and has a longer range, so I will almost certainly keep it. The lens is big--but not too big--and very heavy. The difference between it and my 18-35G (feather light) and 24-85G (light) is astonishing. Nonetheless, I don't believe it is too heavy to carry around all day. Also, I prefer its "squat" not-too-long size to the longer, skinnier 70-200mm F/4 VR. It balances better at the end of an FX camera, and improves focus at very slow shutter speeds (yes, even with the excellent VR). I also prefer the heavier Canon 70-300 L size to the lighter but longer 70-200 L f/4 IS size, but that's a different topic. However, you need to try it before making the decision for your own personal use. Note: a Nikon D800E was the test camera--I did not use this lens with an DX/APS-C camera. Okay, here's the lowdown on IQ. At 24mm At a distance (25meters) In the center the Sigma is sharper than the Nikon 18-35mm G wide open and much sharper than the 24-85mm. However, the 18-35 G catches up and even surpasses the Sigma on the edges. The 24-85 has the worst edges. However, the Sigma gets even sharper stopping down to f/5.6 and has decent to good edges at f/8. I really don't see much improvement in the Nikon pair from stopping down, so this is a big positive for the Sigma. Closer in (3meters), the Sigma still maintains its advantage, but differences are just not as noticeable. At 35mm The Sigma seems to be at its best. The difference between it and the Nikon zooms is even more apparent, and the Sigma just might be sharper at 35mm than at 24mm. Sharpness, however, still drops off near the edges and differences between it and the Nikons aren't as pronounced. At 50mm The Sigma is still very sharp in the center but the lead over the Nikon 24-85mm isn't as pronounced. I really have to pixel-peep to see differences in the center. Both the Sigma and Nikon have better edges at 50mm, and the Sigma maintains its edge (on the edges), but there aren't major differences. As with other focal lengths, the Sigma gains more from stopping down and has very nice edge-to-edge sharpness at f/8. The Nikon is good here as well, but the Sigma is better. One annoying aspect of this lens is that it doesn't ever communicate 50mm to the camera. The camera registers 48mm and 52mm but never 50mm. The same is true at 70mm and 80mm. These FL are indicated on the barrel of the lens, but will not register in the EXIF files as such. At 70mm Which is 68mm for the Sigma, the lenses are indistinguishable in the center wide open (f/4 for Sigma, f/4.5 for Nikon). However, stopping down to f/5.6 provides a razor sharp center for the Sigma, that the Nikon doesn't reach. Unfortunately, the Sigma falls off faster towards the edges, which only improve to an okay level at f/8. At 85mm The Sigma (82mm in the Exif information) once again takes a substantial lead. Wide open it is noticeably sharper than the Nikon in the center and a little sharper on the edges. Stopping down to F/5.6, the Sigma is razor sharp in the center and much sharper than the Nikon throughout the frame. It still takes f/8 to get edge-to-edge sharpness, but if you can stop it down this much, you will find the result truly impressive. At 105mm No comparison here (that will come later), but the above pattern holds here as well. At f/4 the Sigma seems relatively soft in the center. It sharpens a bit at f/5.6 but is at peak sharpness--nearly razor sharp--at f/8. At f/8 the edges sharpen up to an acceptable level but trail the center noticeably. Overall, a very good performance and a good choice for a walk around lens if you can handle the weight. As for other IQ characteristics, there is quite a bit of light falloff (vignetting) wide open at every focal lengths. However, this is easily corrected, so I don't consider it major. Chromatic aberration is also quite noticeable. Someone mentioned a susceptibility to flare. I was able to see some flare by shooting into the sun early in the week, but I could not duplicate it in my testing today. Suffice to say flare is possible, but if you shoot with the hood and are careful about the location of the sun, flare should be manageable as well. For the first few days I had the Sigma I wasn't sure if I was going to keep this lens. I focussed too much on the flaws, which after additional testing I find to be acceptable compromises in a lens with this range. Zooms are by necessity a compromise. This more than 4x lens is very ambitious (the best full-frame zooms are 3x or less) so its imperfections are not surprising. Moreover, although I have never shot with the Nikon 24-120mm based on reviews of that lens and my experience with this one, I am convinced that the Sigma is the best normal-range zoom for my purposes. EDITED: March 9, 2014 Got a chance to compare with my 70-200 f/4 VR and the results were extremely promising. At 70mm (68 for the Sigma) the lenses are really close. It's hard to say which lens I'd give an edge to. At 85mm (82 for the Sigma), the 70-200 is better wide open, but the Sigma catches and, and perhaps, surpasses it by f/5.6. It gets interesting at 105mm. By comparison, the Sigma is noticeably softer wide open. But stopped down to f/5.6, the Sigma is better! Perhaps the resolution is about the same, but the Sigma has better contrast and color. The Sigma's softness wide open may simply be lower contrast and not lower resolution. Because this review is long enough already, I will stop here. However, for anyone who is curious, I will add details and my thoughts on edge softness (it's complicated and deals with field curvature of the lens) in the comment section.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2014 Reviewed in the United States on March 6, 2014 by Gatorowl
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
Overall this is a decent lens but really no better than the Canon 24-105L. My main issue with the lens is the SERIOUS vignetting and distortion that occurs at 24mm which is so bad that it is difficult to correct even in Lightroom. The image quality is generally good but the OS on this lens provides maybe 3 stops of assistance, certainly not as good as other forms of stabilization I've used on other lenses. I love Sigma's 35mm 1.4 art lens, but this lens is a disappointment.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 7, 2018 by JJ
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
I also have the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 VC lens. While it is a good lens and great in low light, it seemed to be lacking in tack sharpness. Hard to put my finger on it. The Sigma is very sharp. It also has that little extra reach which really counts. I bought this lens when Amazon was out of stock on new ones. I ended up getting it right here on Amazon in perfect condition for a great price used. I use it on a Nikon D810 and it hasn't left it since I received it. I'm very happy with it. I haven't had to make any focus adjustments to the lens.and I do not as of yet own the dock for it.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2015 by T. Streiff
Style: Nikon Cameras
Set: US Version
Solid build quality. Focus and zoom work very smoothly. The anti-shake mechanism, called OS by Sigma, appears to be very effective. I checked the phase detect autofocus system using a target and with minor variations, it appears to be very good over the zoom range. Overall, the lens appears to perform well in test shots; a field trip is scheduled soon and that will be the real test. I recommend the lens. It is a substantial, macho piece of glass for those who feel they need a lens with presence.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2014 by Dave O