Search  for anything...

PowerColor AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT ITX Gaming Graphics Card with 4GB GDDR6 Memory

  • Based on 588 reviews
Condition: New
Checking for product changes
$154.99 Why this price?
Save $10.00 was $164.99

Buy Now, Pay Later


As low as $25.83 / mo
  • – 6-month term
  • – No impact on credit
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout. Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Selected Option

Free shipping on this product

This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.


Availability: In Stock.
Fulfilled by Amazon

Arrives Sunday, May 5
Order within 1 hour and 38 minutes
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Style: 6500XT ITX


Features

  • Memory Speed:18.0 Gbps.Digital Max Resolution:76804320
  • Stream Processor: 1024
  • Game Clock: 2610Mhz
  • Boost Clock: 2815Mhz
  • Memory Clock: 18.0 Gbps

Description

PowerColor AMD Radeon RX 6500XT Gaming Graphics Card with 4GB GDDR6 Memory


Graphics Coprocessor: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT


Brand: PowerColor


Graphics Ram Size: 4 GB


GPU Clock Speed: 2610 MHz


Video Output Interface: 1 x HDMI 2.1 , 1 x DisplayPort 1.4


Memory Speed: ‎18 GHz


Graphics Coprocessor: ‎AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT


Chipset Brand: ‎AMD


Graphics Card Ram Size: ‎4 GB


Brand: ‎PowerColor


Item model number: ‎AXRX 6500XT 4GBD6-DH


Hardware Platform: ‎PC


Item Weight: ‎1.23 pounds


Processor Brand: ‎AMD


Batteries: ‎1 Lithium Ion batteries required.


Manufacturer: ‎PowerColor


Language: ‎English, English, English, English, English


Country of Origin: ‎China


Date First Available: ‎January 19, 2022


Frequently asked questions

If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is: Sunday, May 5

Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

  • Klarna Financing
  • Klarna Pay in 4
  • PayTomorrow Financing
  • Apple Pay Later
Leasing options through Acima may also be available during checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Top Amazon Reviews


  • A niche "upgrade" for an HP Pavilion Gaming PC
Style: 6400 ITX
My wife has a HP Pavilion 690-0010 PC. HP marketed this as a gaming PC. We all know better. I bought the Pavilion at the time for my wife to have access to the typical web browsing and email. She is not a gamer but on occasion she will play games with the family. Things like Overwatch 2 and Diablo 3. As with the other PCs in my household, I have done my best to upgrade this PC. Ove the years, I upgraded the RAM from 8GB to 16GB, added a WD Blue M.2 500GB SATA SSD and made this SSD the OS/app drive and now the stock WD Blue 1TB 7200RPM drive is a data drive. (I had to find my own M.2 screw. HP did not include one.) I even swapped out the stock Ryzen 3 2200G CPU with a Ryzen 5 2600 CPU. This was a neat upgrade. While on the original Ryzen 3 2200G, the PC did not qualify for Windows 11. After the CPU swap, the PC can now run Windows 11. With the PC being a small OEM box, upgrades are limited. The last wanting part to be replaced is the dedicated stock GPU which is a Radeon RX 550. I have been hoping that either Nvidia or AMD would release a newer non PCIE power required inexpensive GPU to replace the Raden RX 550. As an aside, my daughter has an HP Pavilion 790-0010 and about a year ago I replaced her stock GPU which was a 2GB GTX 1050 with an Asus Pheonix model GTX 1650. I was not able to get a second GTX 1650 at that time for my wife's PC and my daughter actively plays games more than my wife, so my daughter got the GTX 1650. The GTX 1650 upgraded the VRAM from 2GB to 4GB and made her PC VR ready. Though I take that with a grain of salt even though the Windows Mixed Reality Utility says she can do VR. Back to my wife's PC. I have been waiting for a GPU deal. So, I saw this PowerColor RX6400 come on sale. I knew that this was a severely nerfed GPU compared to even the RX 6500XT. Spec wise, it has a narrower memory bus and lacks video encoders. However, the RX6400 is more powerful than the RX550. Even with a narrower memory bus than the RX550 and only 4 PCE lanes in the PCIE connector, it still performs in my wife's HP PC which only has a PCIE 3.0 bus, about the same as the GTX 1650 in my daughter's PC. The RX6400 supports Raytracing. However, to be realistic, the 4GB VRAM is not enough memory for most Raytracing games to run and this GPU is still not that great compared to modern offerings in a similar price range. However, this was the only upgrade solution for my wife's PC, and it does provide more performance than she had. The card is 2 slots wide is full height and has a short length. Installation in her PC was easy. I did not have to do more than take the cover off the HP and swap GPU cards. For other upgrades, I had to move drive cages and things to get to the innards. The old GPU and this GPU were physically small enough that I had ample clearance to make the swap with only removing the case cover and opening the expansion card latch on the case. I did have to break out one of the metal slot covers on the case to fit the double wide card. The old RX550 had an HDMI output and a DVI output for video. The RX6400 has an HDMI output and DisplayPort output. I needed to use a DisplayPort to DVI converter so that I could still use my wife's monitor. Or I could have bought a new DisplayPort to DVI cable. So be mindful that you have the right cable or adapter on hand since the RX6400 lacks a DVI output. Once installed and powered up, I reinstalled the current AMD drivers without issue. I tried playing vides off YouTube and doing normal everyday tasks and I noticed no difference compared to the RX550. I mention this because this means my wife will not notice any detrimental difference compared to what the RX550 delivered. I also want to mention that this card has no video encoders. Not that my wife will try any streaming but that will not happen realistically on this card. No idea if the RX550 had video encoders. As did the RX550, this card is also quiet in the HP case, so it feels as though it is still a stock OEM card. I did run the Windows Mixed Reality Check tool, the SteamVR Performance TestTool. The WMR tool said my wife's PC is ready for WMR. The SteamVR tool indicated her PC is now Capable of SteamVR but recommended the RX6400 should be upgraded to be Ready for SteamVR. The result indicated some titles would work, others would not. This is better than the stock RX550 which could not pass either VR tool. To be clear, I do NOT recommend attempting VR on this GPU as it is still a low-end GPU. Lastly, I bought this PowerColor branded RX6400 during a promotion which netted me a free copy of The of Us Part 1. To get the game, you are emailed a coupon code which you need to redeem on AMDRewards.com. This triggers the download of the AMD Product Verification Tool and after it checks your coupon code, performs some sorcery, I was able to redeem the game on my Steam account once I linked my AMDRewards account to my Steam account. So I got a AAA first party title with my purchase that I was not expecting to get. The TLDR, this was a small upgrade that was imperceivable to my wife but at least gave her something more modern than what she had with a performance uplift that she will probably not realistically see. At least it should ensure GPU driver support going forward over what the RX550 will receive. This is a niche product that I bought at a marked down sale price, and I am happy for the game I received and the price I paid at the time of purchase. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 13, 2023 by D. C. White

  • Overall best/on a short list for budget or lower power draw.
Style: 6500XT Fighter
This card is a bit of mixed bag. If you judge it for what it is - and not what it could have been if AMD tried harder - it's arguably the overall best choice in a new budget card and/or if looking for lower power consumption. It is a sad commentary on the state of budget cards that this counts as probably the best. But there simply is no competition in this segment. Nvidia has done a new budget card in 5-6 years. As far as 3D (games) performance goes this card is about as fast as Nvidia's GTX 1060 and AMD's Radeon 570/580 . Cards released in 2016/2017. The GTX 1650 (released 2019) is a bit slower but if you search you can find versions of that card that can run on the PCIe bus alone - no extra power cable needed. Appealing if upgrading an older computer with a modest power supply. My primary goal was finding the overall best combination of low power draw and still decent performance. The RX 580 can be had new here on Amazon for around $110. Performance is close but it it's rated at 185 watts and under stress pushes 200 watts. The RX 570 cannot be found new but lots of used on eBay. A claimed 120 watt power draw but they lie. The real world power consumption is very close to the RX 580. The GTX 1060 is probably faster than any of the other cards I've mentioned (not by much) but is rated at 180 watts and while a six year old design is still more expensive than any of the cards mentioned, including the RX 6500 XT being reviewed. A few other things. Nvidia cards are well known to stress 3D performance above 2D. So if you primarily play games the Nvidia cards are good to look at. But if you are doing a lot of picture editing or content creation, the 2D scores of Nvidia cards are notably lower. And AMD's cards are well known to suck substantially more power when using a two monitor set up versus a single monitor. One of the appeals of the RX 6400 and RX 6500 XT - for me - is that power consumption for two monitors remains very reasonable. So anyway.... This card - the RX 6500 XT - is basically the little engine that could. It performs substantially better than you would think looking at the specs. Yes, only PCIe 4x lanes and running PCI 3 vs PCI 4 lowers performance. Yes, a narrow PCI bus (64 bit) and only 4GBs of memory. But the memory is extremely fast. And the clock speed of the GPU itself is extremely high. So if you keep game settings moderate so as to not exceed the 4GB onboard memory, this card delivers. Also of interest is that if your motherboard supports it, you can help this card a lot with faster system memory. Actually, AMD's cards seems especially found of faster memory. I'm running DDR 4 4000MHz memory on PCIe 3.0 and synthetic benchmarks are all 10-15% faster than normal for PCIe 4.0. Power draw - something really important to me just a hobbyist - is also appealing. The smaller brother RX 6400 only draws 53 watts and never needs an extra power connector. But it has just been cut back to much and is.... well .... not fast. Nvidia's GTX 1650 is rated at 75 watts (maximum for PCIe only) but is difficult to hard to find not requiring an extra power connector. This card, the RX 6500 XT - is rated at 107 watts and does require an extra six pin power connector. But my on tests using a watt meter (total system draw) and those of professional reviewers all say the same thing. The RX 6500 XT isn't using a lot of power. Single monitor idle is 2 watts. Dual monitor is 10 watts. Running games it is rarely above 85 watts and max at 100. Even if your computer is older and power supply low wattage, you can probably get a four to six pin adaptor and run this card. Overall, the card strikes a good balance between price, performance and power consumption. Sure, it would be a lot better card with 6 or 8GB of memory. Or more PCIe lanes and faster bus. Or both. But then consumers would probably have no reason to purchase the more expensive (and still a great value) RX 6600. At least AMD tries to offer a couple of new budget cards. Something Nvidia hasn't bothered with for a long, long time. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2023 by Shirley

  • Nice GPU for low budget.
Style: 6500XT Fighter
I just got this gpu around 6 months ago and was a really nice experience with some issues from the beginning with the 2 fans of the gpu because with the drivers at the first time the fans didn't work and the gpu just got overheat and turn my pc off, after that I just format my pc and it works fan sound its not to loud (for a 2 fan gpu used for gaming), but the 4GB of VRAM it's a really low amount for AAA videogames in certain cases but gives you a good performance. So as a conclusion it's a nice gpu for beginning or if you have an apu or low budget. Note: the change if you have a PCIE 3.0 or PCIE 4.0 it's just around 10-20 fps so be careful. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2023 by cristian

  • It does it's job in non graphical FreeBSD
Style: 240 4GB
I bought it to use with FreeBSD in tty only. No X windows. Works great for text only.
Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2023 by Jason Kaiser

  • Great Card for Small Starter Gaming PC
Style: 6400 Low Profile
Bought this for my little brother's new custom pc. It was a very budget build and LP but this fit perfectly and does a decent job with what we've thrown at it.
Reviewed in the United States on July 11, 2023 by sebastian

  • Buena tarjeta gráfica
Style: 6500XT ITX
Buena tarjeta gráfica para empezar en el gaming en pc
Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2023 by Es una excelente tarjeta gráfica para empezar en el mundo del gaming en PC. Lo único malo es que pierde rendimiento si no se conecta a un Pci express 4.0

  • Works well as an entry level graphics card!
Style: 6400 ITX
I bought this to upgrade an existing graphics card (MSI GeForce GT 730). The installation wasn't hard and didn't take long to do. The AMD software Adrenalin Edition comes with a lot of nice features, though some are rather new so they don't work for me. Compared to the old graphics card I was using, this one is definitely faster. It won't have the same performance or functionality as a higher tier card, but works well for the price. It also doesn't require dedicated power and can run from the PCI-E slot. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2023 by Tyler

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.