Notify me when this product is back in stock
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
$14.04
/ mo
Learn more
- – 6-month term
- – No impact on credit
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
This item is eligible for return within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
Unavailable
Recently Viewed
Color: Silver (Model: 35688)
Features
- Stainless steel case 40mm diameter x 14.5mm thick; Exhibition case back; Green dial; Luminous hands
- NH35A Japanese Automatic movement, 24 jewel; Assembled in Malaysia; Watch weight: 155 grams
- Stainless steel band, 205mm L x 20mm W; Band is adjustable by adding/removing links; Fold over safety clasp
- Mineral crystal; Screw-down crown; Uni-directional stainless steel bezel with green top bezel ring; 200 meter water resistant: Suitable for professional marine activity and surface water sports. Suitable for diving.
Package Dimensions : 4.53 x 3.94 x 3.58 inches; 11.32 Ounces
Item model number : 35688
Department : mens
Date First Available : March 3, 2021
Manufacturer : Invicta
Country of Origin : Malaysia
Brand, Seller, or Collection Name: Invicta
Model number: 35688
Part Number: 35688
Item Shape: Round
Dial window material type: Mineral
Display Type: Analog
Clasp: Deployment Clasp With Safety
Case material: Stainless Steel
Case diameter: 40 millimeters
Case Thickness: 14.5 millimeters
Band Material: Stainless Steel
Band size: Mens Standard
Band width: 20 millimeters
Band Color: Silver
Dial color: Green
Bezel material: Stainless Steel
Bezel function: Unidirectional
Calendar: Date
Special features: Water resistant,Glow In The Dark,Date,Scratch-Resistant,Bezel Markings
Movement: Japanese Automatic
Water resistant depth: 200 Meters
Warranty: Manufacturer’s warranty can be requested from customer service. Click here to make a request to customer service.
Frequently asked questions
This product is currently out of stock. Please check back later for shipping info.
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
![Apple Watch Ultra [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Titanium Case with Midnight Ocean Band, One Size (Renewed)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/810JR81LIsL._AC_US500_.jpg)
![Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) 47mm LTE AI Smartwatch w/Energy Score, Wellness Tips, Heart Rate Tracking, Sleep Monitor, Fitness Tracker, GPS, Titanium Gray [US Version, 1Yr Manufacturer Warranty]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81UQDoHG7pL._AC_US500_.jpg)
![Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2024) 47mm LTE AI Smartwatch w/Energy Score, Wellness Tips, Heart Rate Tracking, Sleep Monitor, Fitness Tracker, GPS,Titanium Silver [US Version, 1Yr Manufacturer Warranty]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/817QHxxq34L._AC_US500_.jpg)
Top Amazon Reviews
Color: Stainless Steel
Escribo esta reseña en ESPAÑOL porque casi todas son en Ingles y para tratar de orientar a ese gran público de habla hispana, aunque con el traductor inmediatamente alguien que hable solo ingles puede entender el sentido de lo escrito. Es sobre el reloj 8926 OB de INVICTA , un reloj de buzo o diver homenaje al Submariner de Rolex pero con la marca Invicta claramente definida, haciendo hincapié en que ese Rolex ha sido copiado e imitado por muchas empresas relojeras del mundo (tengo entendido que Rolex nunca patentó el diseño). No critico a Invicta por hacer un reloj casi igual especialmente si no tengo la capacidad de tener un Rolex de 10.000 dólares y si los tuviera es mas probable que estaría metido en una caja y saldría con el solo para un sitio muy exclusivo o una fiesta. Con lo que vale el Rolex (mas como inversión) me compro unos 100 Invictas hasta para regalar por lo que me parece fuera de contexto una comparación que vi en You tube sobre este reloj y el Submariner. Hoy en día una persona sensata no se va a exponer en la calle a un robo a mano armada -en cualquier parte del mundo- por el que un ladrón es capaz hasta de hacer daño para llevarse fácilmente el Rolex. Con este Invicta podemos lucir tranquilos un buen reloj de sólida construcción y de detalles bien acabados y con un brazalete que si no es perfecto, es de buena calidad. Que si tiene un grabado que dice Invicta, que si el último eslabón es hueco, son cosas insignificantes para mi si me siento cómodo con este reloj que creo que cumple con las expectativas. El hecho de que tenga miles de reseñas positivas ya es un aval. Es cierto que a alguien puede haberle salido mal la corona, o que se le desprendió el bisel o que este es un poco duro. Son excepciones, el 90 % cree que es un buen reloj incluyendo a los muchos You Tubers relojeros que dan opinión positiva ya que este es el reloj mas revisado y comentado en You Tube y el que tiene mas reseñas en Amazon. Recordemos que este es un movimiento Seiko automático NH35A y no es exacto. Los relojes de batería son mucho mas exactos con variación de hasta 1 segundo por día. Hasta el mejor reloj mecánico automático de miles de dólares tiene adelantos o retrasos y creo que en mi caso un adelanto de 10 a 12 segundos diario es casi insignificante. Puedo vivir con eso y ajustarlo una vez a la semana, además me hace llegar a tiempo y no tarde. Los detalles del reloj como los acabados, su corona, el bisel que no tiene juego y bien centrado lo hacen lucir como un reloj de 500 $ y no de 86 $ que fue lo me costó. Algunos critican el cepillado porque lo ven un poco burdo ( no es un Rolex, ni un Longines, ni un Omega). Yo lo veo bien y el reloj luce en general buen acabado y buena construcción. La esfera tiene los logos y letras de la marca aplicados en relieve y no pintados como por ejemplo los traen los Tissot de 500 o 1.000 $. Hay muchos modelos de Invicta tipo Diver e incluso este modelo también viene con batería pero siempre un reloj automático mecánico es un complejo mecanismo de relojería (visible en la parte trasera de este reloj), es mas reloj y solo hay que usarlo para que se mantenga activo. Este lo dejo toda la noche sobre la mesa y no se para ( por cierto los que no traen pintado el rotor automático de amarillo también son legítimos, no se preocupe que son variaciones del reloj al igual que la caja puede venir no amarilla sino en un sobrio gris. Un reloj de batería tendrá que abrirlo cada 2 a 4 años para reemplazar la pila y esto puede hacerle perder la impermeabilidad de fábrica lo que no sucedería con este. Solo se abrirá si le va a hacer un servicio y bien cuidado puede durar muchos años. Hay relojes que compiten con este como la marca china Pagano Design mucho mas caros porque traen un cristal de zafiro y no cristal mineral como este pero tienen mas comentarios negativos y podemos decir que una marca de tradición como Invicta y bien posicionada- ahora estadounidense con sede en Florida- tiene buena reputación y da mas confianza aunque haga relojes grandes y de estilo rococó que a algunos no le gusten (a mi tampoco). Eso no me importa mientras fabriquen modelos bonitos y de calidad que tienen. Siempre habrá publico par ese tipo de relojes y si los mantienen es porque los venden. Esta marca tiene cientos de modelos para todos los gustos. En conclusión: el 8926 es un reloj que recomiendo por tener mas virtudes y puntos positivos que defectos los cuales son imperceptibles. Un gasto de menos de 100 dólares en este reloj es ciertamente un valor de calidad precio difícil de conseguir. Es también algo de mala suerte que venga con algún defecto pero por ese precio no creo que consiga algo mejor. Con respecto al servicio de Invicta que algunos critican no estoy seguro ni puedo asegurar que no es así pero por 86 $ antes de mandar a repararlo preferiría comprar uno nuevo si el costo de envío me sale casi igual que el precio del reloj nuevo. Para finalizar quiero decir que este reloj lo recibí el los Estados Unidos en viaje que hice vacaciones en apenas 12 horas con el servicio de Amazon Prime en periodo de prueba. Eliminé el servicio por considerar que no es beneficioso si no se vive allá pero me pareció excelente. Nota: haré una revisión o review dentro de unos meses para evaluarlo nuevamente pues este es con apenas mes y medio de uso. Recomiendo a las personas que dejan comentarios colocar siempre el modelo que analizan
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2023 by Gustavo Chaparro Gustavo Chaparro
Color: Stainless Steel
My first dive watch was Seiko's first dive watch, the 62 MAS introduced in 1965. I've collected watches ever since. The watch pictured next to my Ball Skindiver is the Seiko Prospex Reinterpretation of that original watch, their newer 1965 Automatic Diver's Watch SPB051J1. I wore that original Seiko dive watch for more than 20 years without service of any kind, through thousands of dives. Their new "reinterpretation" is much improved. I bought my first Invicta 9937 to replace that original Seiko many years ago, mostly because I liked the Submariner look, and it served me wonderfully well until a close friend talked me out of it. I bought a new one to replace it ... the 9937 is my favorite Invicta dive watch hands down. So much for the history, but I thought it might be relevant to those considering a purchase. This review will cover and compare the currently available Invicta 9937, and its less expensive cousin, the Invicta 8926. Both are pictured above side-by-side ... you will note that they are virtually identical. in appearance, but significantly different in cost. In my view, the 9937 is the better watch, worth the difference in cost, but "your mileage may vary." This review is posted under both watches. There are MANY good reviews of both watches on Amazon, but if you look at the dates, many are old, and address QC issues that have long been resolved. If you look closely at the picture of both watches side by side, you'll note that they are running within seconds of each other, which is remarkable since they were set several days ago according to the NIST time clock ... the 9937 is about 2 seconds fast, and the 8926 is about 2 seconds slow. That sort of accuracy is NOT to be expected of ANY mechanical watch. My most expensive, COSC Certified, mechanical watches gain, on average, about 3 seconds a day. I found this to be quite surprising. The luminescence on both watches is identically pitiful. They glow, sort of, but compared to my other (NON-Tritium) watches sitting in the exact same conditions (watch boxes), they might as well not have bothered ... removed to a totally dark room, my SEIKO (my best non-tritium) lume) watch is very clear to read, whereas these are invisible. If you need to tell time in the dark, these are a total bust, and one is no better than the other. I am a great fan of Tritium tubes that do NOT fade overnight ... they can be expected to glow exactly the same for 25 years. The watch manufacturers like Ball, Nite, Luminox, etc., that use Tritium tubes are the way to go if it is important to you to be able to read your watch in the dark. The bracelets on dive watches are very important. Lose a single pin, screw, ... whatever, to corrosion, or have the clasp fail, and your watch falls to the bottom of the sea. These bracelets are almost identical, except the clasp, I never had an issue with my 9937's, and I would not expect an issue with either of these. Both bracelets appear to be finished identically, and they feel exactly the same on the wrist, which is to say quite comfortable and, although the clasps are the same general design (with a security fold over) they are made differently, with the 9937 (top in pic) being the better design. NEITHER watch bracelet has a diver's extension to accommodate a wet suit which surprised me. The dials may look identical in the picture, but they are not. The 8926 is a gloss black, but the 9937 seems to have a SLIGHTLY more gray look. The markers and indices are identical. The 9937 has a Sellita Swiss movement. The 8926 has a Japanese movement which I believe to be made by Seiko. The difference is, you can manually wind the Sellita, but both are incredibly accurate and I have found both Seiko, and Sellita movements to be very reliable. The main difference is the crown assembly ... the 9937 is smooth and precise feeling but the 8926 lacks that precision feel. The 9937 no longer has a sapphire crystal (I think my others did). Instead, it is some sort of hardened mineral crystal they call "flame fusion." The 8926 has the basic mineral crystal, which should scratch more easily ... but I have never scratched one. The bezel assemblies are both tight and precise feeling with the same micro click system on both. The engineering is MUCH better than on some of my more expensive watches. The insert fits flush with the bezel, and mates to the crystal perfectly. They are not quite identical, in that the markings on the 8926 seem a bit more "crisp" to me. They claim that both watches are depth rated to 200M and both are listed as suitable for diving. Both have screw in case backs, and both have screw down crowns. The reality is, divers these days almost universally use dive computers, so it isn't like the old days when your dive watch was critical. For diving, I wear my Seiko ... but that may be just an old man's preference based on nostalgia. The bottom line, I think the 9937 is the better watch, and probably worth the price difference, but I found none of the issues with the 8926 that were reported in old reviews. The construction, fit and finish is excellent on both watches, they feel and look exactly the same on my wrist, and I simply cannot account for the accuracy, which is phenomenal. If you are not sure what you will need, or like, I'd suggest the 8926 ... wear it a while and decide if the design and function suits you. For less than $80, you cannot go far wrong and, if it turns out that you like the design of a divers sport watch, you can always upgrade to a better watch of similar design later. I hope this is helpful to someone.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2021 by Bill Branscum Bill Branscum
Color: Stainless Steel
First off, this watch is really good for the money. You’ll have a really difficult time finding another watch rated for 200m water resistance and the NH35 Seiko automatic movement at this price point. The watch is accurate and fairly comfortable. I’ve worn this watch swimming in the pool and just for kicks, in the shower and it did not damage it. I highly recommend buying one used on Amazon if you want the most bang for your buck as that’s what I did. Right at $60 shipped, mine looked brand new in the manufacturer box with tags and protective plastic on the bracelet, I was shocked. The bezel is nice and tight and does its job. The screw down crown works great as well. The only issue I have with it is the lume and it’s hard to complain about that for the money. The lume only lasts about 15 seconds before it’s no longer legible but that’s my only complaint. If you want a good watch you can take to the beach and swim with but you’re on a budget, this is the watch for you
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 6, 2023 by DVine97 DVine97
Color: Stainless Steel
This is a ripo... ahem, an "homage" to a Rolex Submariner in many, many, many details. Is it a Rolex? No, of course not. Is it a good-quality, heavy, automatic dive watch? After two years, I would say it definitely is. Will you gain anything substantial from of the watch that costs $13,000 more? Not in my opinion. Can anyone tell the difference from 10 feet away? Unlikely. Will you be among the oligarchs and bourgeois oppressors lined up against the wall, begging for your pathetic and self-centered life when the glorious revolution comes if you haven't spent $13k for a status symbol while people starve in the streets? Time will tell. Oh yes, time will tell...
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 10, 2023 by Brad Hampton