Search  for anything...

Amazon Essentials Platinum-Plated Sterling Silver Round 3-Stone Ring made with Infinite Elements Cubic Zirconia (2 cttw), Size 9 (previously Amazon Collection)

  • Based on 3,199 reviews
Condition: New
Checking for the best price...

Buy Now, Pay Later


As low as $12.02 / mo
  • – 6-month term
  • – No impact on credit to apply
  • – Instant approval decision
  • – Secure and straightforward checkout

Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.

Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayTomorrow. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Selected Option

Free shipping on this product

FREE 30-day refund/replacement

To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.


Availability: Only 1 left in stock, order soon!
Fulfilled by Amazon

Arrives Friday, May 8
Order within 19 hours and 41 minutes
Available payment plans shown during checkout

Protection Plan Protect Your Purchase
Checking for protection plans...

Color: Platinum


Size: 9


Style: 2 carat


Features

  • Classic 3 stone ring set with round brilliant cut Swarovski Zirconia (2 cttw)
  • A size 9 ring made from platinum plated sterling silver ensures a comfortable fit and high quality product
  • This jewelry design was manufactured with the highest quality standards. All efforts are being made to use sustainable resources and socially responsible providers.
  • Each Swarovski Zirconia is Laser Engraved as a seal of authenticity and guarantees the highest quality diamond simulant in the world
  • This item runs somewhat large, those between sizes should round down.
  • These silver pieces are built for longevity. This piece features a metal plating or flashing, or an electrocoating for a more lustrous appearance, but it can wear off with long-term or heavy use. To ensure the longevity of your plated items store your jewelry in a dark, cool, dry place such as a pouch or air tight box and avoid rubbing plated items together. Also try to avoid exposure to cleaning products and perfume which can both negatively affect your items. Your local jeweler can advise you where to send your jewelry if you would ever like them replated.

Description

An Amazon brand - Classic 3 stone ring set with round brilliant cut Swarovski Zirconia


Department ‏ : ‎ Womens


Date First Available ‏ : ‎ December 3, 2018


Metal stamp: 925 Sterling


Metal: Platinum plated silver


Material: metal


Gem Type: Cubic zirconia


Setting: 3-stone-setting


Item Length: 5 inches


Width: 2 millimeters


Length: 0.26 inches


Total metal weight: 3.7 Grams


Ring size: 9


Resizable: No


Number of stones: 3


Model number: R3014201_120_090


Package: Regal Blue Sueded-Cloth Pouch


Metal stamp: 925 Sterling


Metal: Platinum plated silver


Material: metal


Gem Type: Cubic zirconia


Setting: 3-stone-setting


Item Length: 5 inches


Width: 2 millimeters


Length: 0.26 inches


Total metal weight: 3.7 g


Ring size: 9


Resizable: No


Number of stones: 3


Model number: R3014201_120_090


Package: Regal Blue Sueded-Cloth Pouch


Frequently asked questions

If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is: Friday, May 8

Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.

To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.

View our full returns policy here.

  • Klarna Financing
  • Affirm Pay in 4
  • Affirm Financing
  • Afterpay Financing
  • PayTomorrow Financing
  • Financing through Apple Pay
Leasing options through Acima may also be available during checkout.

Learn more about financing & leasing here.

Top Amazon Reviews


  • So sparkly. So pretty.
Color: Platinum Size: 9 Style: 3 carat
Update 8-July-2020: a 1cttw in size 9 became available so I ordered it. It is absolutely PERFECT! I love love love love this ring so much! I feel much more “myself” again, with a ring that so strongly resembles my real engagement ring that I can wear for the duration of my pregnancy. The 1cttw is the perfect size, and I love that it doesn’t stick up too far off my hand to get caught on things. If I could give 6 stars I would! THANK YOU, Amazon, for helping this preggo feel a little more normal during a not-so-normal time of life. Update 2-July-2020: the other two rings arrived and they’re beautiful. As promised, I have taken photos comparing all three rings and their sizes. The 3 cttw is size 9 in silver; the 2 cttw is size 8 in rose gold (and, guys, it’s a gorgeous color - the photos don’t do it justice); and the 1 cttw is size 7 in yellow gold. I’m not a flashy person, so the 2 cttw is still too big for me, but the 1 cttw is PERFECT! Now I need to cross my fingers that they eventually come out with the 1 cttw in larger ring sizes. I have also included a photo comparing the 1 cttw zirconia ring to my 1 cttw diamond engagement ring. You can see they are very similar in size, which is what I was looking for. All in all, I think these rings are great, but I will be returning the two larger ones, as they’re simply too flashy for my taste. Original review 26-June-2020: I’m giving this five stars because it does look really nice and it’s comfortable to wear, and my complaints about it are 100% my personal opinion and not a problem with the product itself. I’m 25 weeks pregnant with terrible sausage fingers, and I wanted some sparkle to make me feel pretty until I lose the baby weight, so I turned to Amazon. In my search for a placeholder “engagement ring” this one really stood out to me, but in the size 9(!!!) that I need, the smallest zirconia I could select was 3cttw. I read many, many reviews and looked through every photo uploaded by reviewers on this ring, and I couldn’t find a photo that specifically said it was a 3cttw. A lot of people loved their rings and said that bigger than 2cttw would look fake. I really wanted the 1cttw, but took a chance on the 3cttw hoping that with a size 9 and my preggie sausage fingers it wouldn’t look too big. I was wrong, it’s huge. I did order a size 8 in 2cttw and a size 7 in 1cttw (to keep the sparkle going while I lose the baby weight of course) but those haven’t arrived yet. I will update my review with more photos comparing the three sizes of zirconia. Until then, I’m debating whether I want to return the 3cttw because it’s just far too flashy for my taste. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 27, 2020 by vonSteuben

  • Compare 2 and 3ctw 3-Stone Rings with 2ctw 5-Stone Ring
Color: Platinum Size: 8 Style: 2 carat
I bought these rings to replace my diamond wedding/engagement rings that don't fit right now. Thanks lockdown lifestyle. Very well made. Solid metal construction, platinum over sterling. I have had them for a few weeks now, if the color changes I will update this review. The Swarovski stones are secure in the setting. I wanted a beefy wedding ring so went for the 2ctw 5-stone. It's substantial. The 2ctw 3-stone looked a little skimpy next to it, the center of the 3-stone not much bigger than each of the 5-stones. So I exchanged it for the 3ctw 3-stone and now have LOTS of bling on my finger. I recently went to visit family and every single person complimented my rings. For a more modest look I would recommend the 1.25ctw 5-stone and 2ctw 3-stone, which is still quite an impressive set. CZs tend to run white so I just finished baking my rings in the oven at 400 degrees for two hours and am pleased with the results. It's subtle but they are a bit warmer, clearer, and sparkle more. The before/after pictures were taken in the exact same lighting. Be sure to place the glass dish in the oven when it is cold and do not remove the rings for two hours after turning off the oven to avoid cracking the stones. And wash well with soap and warm water, then buff dry before baking to avoid embedding a fingerprint on the CZ. The metal was not impacted by the baking process. Also, the rings run a bit big. I initially bought size 8 and wound up exchanging them for 7 in both rings. All in all, I am quite pleased with the purchase and not sure I want to go back to my diamonds when they do fit again. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2021 by Leah

  • Actually very nice and real looking BUT don't go big!
Color: Platinum Size: 6 Style: 2 carat
I got the 2 carat ring and it is honestly really nice looking and could definitely pass for real diamonds. I initially ordered the 3 ct and it looked so big and fake looking so I immediately returned it and got the 2 ct which looked stunning. So less is more if you're going for something that looks like a real diamond ring. I purchased this for international travel. I also got the Amazon 4 stone band and they went great together. It was nice to have some sparkle on my hand but also not have to worry about theft or loss since it's so inexpensive! I'm normally a 6.5 on my ring finger but these rings run large in my opinion. I ordered the 6 and it fit great. If you've got thick knuckles or chubby fingers then maybe stick with your normal size. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 14, 2024 by FlyingDonkeyKick

  • Great for price
Color: Platinum Size: 7 Style: 2 carat
I am using this as a stand in for my real wedding ring, it looks shockingly similar. So much so my husband is confused why he paid so much for my real ring 😂. I did the silver 2 caret ring and I would say that is probably as large as I would go and have people still assume it was real. So it’s very pretty and I love it much more than ones I saw in stores for much higher prices (also cubic zirconia - yet they were charging $150), so I’m very pleased with my purchase. The only downside is I confined I was a size 7 at the jewelry stores i went to but this size 7 is a bit too big, and at $26 it feels silly to resize it. Also I’m not a fan of the bows on the side of the stones (see picture). Overall very happy for the price. ... show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2020 by Jennifer Minarik

Can't find a product?

Find it on Amazon first, then paste the link below.
Checking for best price...