$78.00
Save $17.49
was $95.49
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
$13.00
/ mo
Learn more
- – 6-month term
- – No impact on credit to apply
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, Affirm, Afterpay, Zip, Apple Pay, and Google Pay. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
FREE 30-day refund/replacement
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
In Stock.
Arrives
Sunday, Nov 8
At a glance
- Condition
- New
- Dimensions
- 6.14 x 1.64 x 9.21 in
- Weight
- 2.25 lb
- Publisher
- Clarendon Press
- Publication date
- May 31, 1990
- Edition
- Revised ed.
- Language
- English
Description
Exploring Aristotle's philosophical method and the merits of his conclusions, Irwin here shows how Aristotle defended dialectic against the objection that it cannot justify a metaphysical realist's claims. He focuses particularly on Aristotle's metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, and ethics, stressing the connections between doctrines that are often discussed separately. Read more
Specs 9
| Publisher | Clarendon Press |
|---|---|
| Publication date | May 31, 1990 |
| Edition | Revised ed. |
| Language | English |
| Print length | 720 pages |
| ISBN-10 | 0198242905 |
| ISBN-13 | 01 |
| Item Weight | 2.25 pounds |
| Dimensions | 6.14 x 1.64 x 9.21 inches |
No specs match.
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Sunday, Nov 8
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- Zip Pay in 4
- Financing through Apple Pay
- Financing through Google Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
long text, very detailed, very complete.
Format: Paperback
This is a masterful, definitive guide to understanding Aristotle's use of, and understanding of, first principles.
Reviewed in the United States on August 12, 2025 by Gene C. Bammel
Excellent work on the subject
Format: Kindle
This is an excellent work on Aristotle's first principles by a well-known scholar in the field. I honestly cannot make out what the other reviewer here on Amazon (who calls the work a "farse" - it is actually "farce") has in mind or by what means such a judgment has been made. As a professional philosopher working on related issues in the field, I personally recommend this work as well as all of the works of Dr. Irwin.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2019 by JC
Is this an honest work or a farse Aristotle's First Principles
Format: Paperback
In Chapter one section four (Puzzles About Dialectic) To begin our investigation we have a statement that. "Realists must allow the logical possibility of the truth of scepticism, since they take truth to consist in the correspondence of beliefs to some reality that is logically independent of them; this logical independence implies the logical possibility that all our beliefs are false. and therefore leaves logical room for the sceptical doubt to be correct. Any justification appealing to coherence between beliefs seems to leave room for sceptical doubt; and it has sometimes seemed that only beliefs immune to doubt could be reasonable foundations for realist claims. The search for beliefs immune to doubt leads naturally to a foundationalist conception of justification, according to which all inferential justification depends on beliefs that are non-inferentially justified and self-evident." First the author fails to make a distinction between beliefs and inferences. Second considering this statement "this logical independence implies the logical possibility that all our beliefs are false". What he should have said is "this logical independence implies the logical possibility that all our inferences are false" after all we are talking about aristotle the father of the science of logic. Lets examine that proposition which takes the form of all S are P. Now lets assume that this proposition is true, the equivalent to this statement is all S are not non-P. If we take the negation of false (non-P) represents a true inference then our statement would read all our inferences are not true which is equivalent to all our inferences are false. Now if we take the negation of all S are not non-P we get no S are non-P or none of our inferences are true. We can see that the statement all of our inferences are false and none of our inferences are true agree with one another. Now that we have established the proposition that none of our inferences are true as a true proposition we have to ask the question are any of our inferences true, and we find that the answer is yes that the inference that none of our inferences are true is established as a true proposition (inference). Now what we have have is not one proposition but two propositions. First we have one proposition that none of our inferences are true Which takes the form No S are P. Our second proposition is that at least one of our inferences is in fact true, namely the E propisition No S are P. This second would take the form that some of our inferences (at least one) are true. Thus we have the I Proposition Some S are P. Now If we look at the square of opposition modern or traditional we find that these two propositions contradict one another. It seems that this author is woefully ignorant to logic formal or traditional. I gave it two stars because to the true student of logic there will always be some valuable information to be found but to the novice this is a terrible way to start. The best books on logic are old out of print books found on google books. Recently Some of these books are being reproduced on a small scale.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2014 by Danny Somerby