1.25 Carat Round Brilliant Cubic Zirconia Sterling Silver 925 Wedding Engagement Ring Band Set Sizes 4 to 11
Condition: New
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as
$7
/ mo
Learn more
- – 4-month term
- – No impact on credit
- – Instant approval decision
- – Secure and straightforward checkout
Ready to go? Add this product to your cart and select a plan during checkout.
Payment plans are offered through our trusted finance partners Klarna, PayTomorrow, Affirm, Afterpay, Apple Pay, and PayPal. No-credit-needed leasing options through Acima may also be available at checkout.
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Selected Option
Free shipping on this product
30-day returns
Learn more
Eligible for Return, Refund or Replacement within 30 days of receipt
To qualify for a full refund, items must be returned in their original, unused condition. If an item is returned in a used, damaged, or materially different state, you may be granted a partial refund.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
Availability:
In Stock.
Arrives
Monday, Sep 8
Recently Viewed
Ring Size: 7
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer : No
Item Weight : 4.8 ounces
Item model number : SILRXX74
Department : womens
Date First Available : July 12, 2012
Brand, Seller, or Collection Name: Bonndorf
Metal stamp: Sterling Silver
Metal: Rhodium-plated silver
Material: Metal, gemstone
Gem Type: Cubic Zirconia
Minimum total gem weight: 1.25 carats
Setting: Prong
Width: 7 millimeters
Ring size: 7
Resizable: No
Number of stones: 1
Stone Weight: 1.25 carats
Model number: SILRXX747
Frequently asked questions
If you place your order now, the estimated arrival date for this product is:
Monday, Sep 8
Yes, absolutely! You may return this product for a full refund within 30 days of receiving it.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
To initiate a return, please visit our Returns Center.
View our full returns policy here.
- Klarna Financing
- Affirm Pay in 4
- Affirm Financing
- Afterpay Financing
- PayTomorrow Financing
- Financing through Apple Pay
Learn more about financing & leasing here.
Similar Products
Top Amazon Reviews
Ring Size: 8
After 2 pregnancies and 2 hand surgeries my engagement and wedding rings no longer fit. I had to have my solitaire engagement ring cut off after the second hand surgery. My original bands have channel settings and can't be resized so I looked on Amazon to see what I could find to replace them. I'm the type who isn't impressed with how much a diamond cost, or that it's "real" - I care more about how my rings look, comfort and how they make me feel when I wear them. I originally ordered this set as a tester, thinking I would get the same CZ stones and settings but in white gold. After wearing these rings for a few days I'm keeping them! This ring set is absolutely beautiful. I can't justify spending $200- $300 more on white gold rings. White gold is also rhodium plated, the same as these sterling silver rings. The look is identical, and having them re-dipped as needed in rhodium is very inexpensive; you have to do that with white gold anyway or else it turns back to yellow. The pave stones along the sides of both bands are shimmery, understated,and elegant - not gaudy or pretentious. This lends a very realistic look and feel to the rings. The pave stones also let the solitaire stand out, exactly as they should, rather than competing and being "too much". I don't know why anyone would want them to be bigger or shinier. Pave set stones are supposed to look this way, very close together as if the band is "paved" with small elegant diamonds. Of course in this case the bands are paved with cubic zirconias, but they are indistinguishable from diamonds to my eye and everyone who has seen them so far. The solitaire is gorgeous! In the light it flashes a zillion colors, just like a high quality diamond has. Very sparkly and brilliant, but not "too much". The size is perfect, again not being so small that it's unnoticeable, but not so big that anyone would think, "Nice fake ring." I would have preferred 6 prongs to 4 on the solitaire because I worry about it coming loose (I am hard on my rings) but really, 4 prongs means you can see more of the stone. These could easily pass for a $2500 - $3500 white gold and diamond wedding ring set at a midrange retail store like Helzberg or Zales. I am uploading pics of the rings on my fingers, swollen as they are after surgery, and will post again in 3-6 months with an update on how they're holding up, if any stones have fallen out, etc. Honestly though, these are so pretty I'm considering ordering an extra set just in case. For $40, to me it's practically a no-brainer.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2014 by M.S. M.S.
Ring Size: 10
Ok so I should start off by saying this was a mothers day gift, and one of the best ones I've gotten. My husband is one of those guys that can never seem to get what you ask for, even if it's written down verbatim.... so in the last few years he's had me pick what I want and get it all ready and then let him hit the order button so he can say he "bought" it. 😅 We don't have a ton of money so I am overly cautious about my real ring and he always gives me grief about constantly taking it off. I decided for mothers day I would ask for a less expensive ring that I don't have to worry about ruining. I went with this set because they actually had my size [10] and the reviews were great - especially about the durability even through things like pools/showering/dishes/etc. It's been a long time since I've worn CZ and I forgot how foggy it can look [my camera had a hard time even focusing on it before I baked it]. I had noticed reviews about baking it so I searched the internet to find out more about that. It DEFINITELY makes a difference! The set was beautiful before, but it's gorgeous now! 😍 See the photo above for before[left] and after[right] photos. I'll update my review if it doesn't last long, but for now I'm overjoyed with it! This is how I personally baked them - I put on gloves and gently cleaned them with a damp [water only] paper towel so that no towel fibers would get stuck. I allowed them to dry for about 6 hours to make sure they were completely dry. Using gloves again so I didnt leave any fingerprints that can get baked in, I put them in a clear glass baking dish and in a COLD oven. I set the temp to 400° and baked for 2-2.5 hours [my power went out for a few minutes and I forgot to reset the oven so I'm not sure EXACTLY how long it was]. DO NOT open the oven once you put them in, even after you turn it off - wait until it's completely cooled down. Dramatic temperature changes can crack the stone. After a very impatient few hours, I took it out and was amazed at how nice it looks now! Hope this helps 😊
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2022 by BlueEyedBatman BlueEyedBatman
Ring Size: 7.5
Very nice quality rings for the money. My wife is hard on rings, and after replacing the first 3, she told me not to waste the money and just get her something symbolic that was pretty. Mission accomplished. She picked them out, loves the design and the fit. She's been wearing them a while now, and they still look great.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2023 by Lee R.
Ring Size: 5.5
The media could not be loaded. This really is a beautiful ring and worth the price without looking tacky or cheap. I purchased this ring as a stand in while my wedding set is being resized and it's a perfect substitute! The reason for 4 out of 5 rating is main stone is a bit large for my preference and set on the dainty band gives away to it being a CZ. There should be options for stone size. Initially the stone looked very clear and an obvious fake, after baking at 400° for about 3 hours it looks much more realistic. The matching wedding band is 5 stars! It is undetectable in difference compared to my genuine pave diamond wedding band. This ring is an exquisite substitute and would be a completely satisfying set as a primary wedding and engagement set.
...
show more
Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2020 by Kristina Argust Kristina Argust