That product is currently unavailable. Please try a different product or see this article for help.
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes

Brooks Women's Running Shoes

Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
Brooks Women's Running Shoes
$191.58 Why this price?
Checking for changes Product info up-to-date Product info updated We've detected that this product is out of stock. Enter your email below and we will notify you when it is available.
Buy Now, Pay Later
As low as $ / mo
- month term
- No impact on credit score
- Quick & easy checkout
- Legal stuff:
Promotional Offer
Estimations exclude tax, and assume no other Klarna balances. Non-promotional balances have a 19.99% APR and a $2 monthly minimum interest charge. Accounts are subject to credit approval, and issued by WebBank, member FDIC.

Free shipping on this product


Availability: In Stock
Fulfilled by Amazon

Features

  • Mesh
  • Imported
  • Gum Rubber sole
  • SHOE SIZE: "B" = Medium width, "D" = Wide width
  • FOOT SUPPORT: Ideal for runners with a medium to high arch looking for neutral support.
  • SUPER-SOFT CUSHIONING: Brooks brand-new DNA LOFT cushioning is engineered to provide a luxurious feeling underfoot without losing responsiveness and durability.
  • BREATHABLE: The new Double Jacquard Mesh is engineered for strategic breathability, flexibility, and structure.
  • PLUSH FIT: The plush feel of an internal stretch bootie surrounds your foot and moves and expands with your stride. The new, engineered mesh upper and 3D Fit Print technology only enhance the fit.

Description

The new Brooks DNA LOFTS cushioning is created to ensure a feeling of softness underfoot without affecting reactivity and efficiency. The incredibly soft DNA LOFTS special area gives you an extraordinary feeling. The new Fit Print upper in 3 D technology even further improves the quality of your step.


Department Womens


Manufacturer Brooks


Product Dimensions 14 x 8 x 6 inches


ASIN B077YNHK96


UNSPSC Code 53110000


Item model number 1202781D


Is Discontinued By Manufacturer No


Date First Available May 22, 2018


Customer Reviews 4.7 out of 5 stars


Shipping

This product includes free shipping to all US addresses.


Delivery

Unless otherwise stated above, most products arrive within 2-3 business days. Larger items may take 6-9 business days. Tracking information will be automatically provided as soon as your order ships.


View our full shipping policy here.

Returns

This product can be returned within 30 days of delivery for a full refund. Please visit our returns center to begin a return.

View our full returns policy here.

Features

  • Mesh
  • Imported
  • Gum Rubber sole
  • SHOE SIZE: "B" = Medium width, "D" = Wide width
  • FOOT SUPPORT: Ideal for runners with a medium to high arch looking for neutral support.
  • SUPER-SOFT CUSHIONING: Brooks brand-new DNA LOFT cushioning is engineered to provide a luxurious feeling underfoot without losing responsiveness and durability.
  • BREATHABLE: The new Double Jacquard Mesh is engineered for strategic breathability, flexibility, and structure.
  • PLUSH FIT: The plush feel of an internal stretch bootie surrounds your foot and moves and expands with your stride. The new, engineered mesh upper and 3D Fit Print technology only enhance the fit.

Description

The new Brooks DNA LOFTS cushioning is created to ensure a feeling of softness underfoot without affecting reactivity and efficiency. The incredibly soft DNA LOFTS special area gives you an extraordinary feeling. The new Fit Print upper in 3 D technology even further improves the quality of your step.


Department Womens


Manufacturer Brooks


Product Dimensions 14 x 8 x 6 inches


ASIN B077YNHK96


UNSPSC Code 53110000


Item model number 1202781D


Is Discontinued By Manufacturer No


Date First Available May 22, 2018


Customer Reviews 4.7 out of 5 stars


Shipping

This product includes free shipping to all US addresses.


Delivery

Unless otherwise stated above, most products arrive within 2-3 business days. Larger items may take 6-9 business days. Tracking information will be automatically provided as soon as your order ships.


View our full shipping policy here.

Returns

This product can be returned within 30 days of delivery for a full refund. Please visit our returns center to begin a return.

View our full returns policy here.

Features

  • Mesh
  • Imported
  • Gum Rubber sole
  • SHOE SIZE: "B" = Medium width, "D" = Wide width
  • FOOT SUPPORT: Ideal for runners with a medium to high arch looking for neutral support.
  • SUPER-SOFT CUSHIONING: Brooks brand-new DNA LOFT cushioning is engineered to provide a luxurious feeling underfoot without losing responsiveness and durability.
  • BREATHABLE: The new Double Jacquard Mesh is engineered for strategic breathability, flexibility, and structure.
  • PLUSH FIT: The plush feel of an internal stretch bootie surrounds your foot and moves and expands with your stride. The new, engineered mesh upper and 3D Fit Print technology only enhance the fit.

Description

The new Brooks DNA LOFTS cushioning is created to ensure a feeling of softness underfoot without affecting reactivity and efficiency. The incredibly soft DNA LOFTS special area gives you an extraordinary feeling. The new Fit Print upper in 3 D technology even further improves the quality of your step.


Department Womens


Manufacturer Brooks


Product Dimensions 14 x 8 x 6 inches


ASIN B077YNHK96


UNSPSC Code 53110000


Item model number 1202781D


Is Discontinued By Manufacturer No


Date First Available May 22, 2018


Customer Reviews 4.7 out of 5 stars


abunda_amazon_reviews I was looking for high quality shoes that had a lot of cushion and room in the toe box. I would be using them primarily for walking around town and jogging on a treadmill. I have flat feel and pronate but didn't want a support shoe because the arch and rigidity is not comfortable for me. I prefer to use an arch support sock or arch wrap. I narrowed my choices to the New Balance 1080v9 (NB) vs Brooks Glycerin16 (Brooks) and tried them both. While looking at reviews, many people noted the Brooks ran narrow so I purchased that shoe in wide to accommodate the bunions I earned during my stiletto days. I found them to be very similar in fit. I wear 8.5 and they both ran true in length but the NB regular width felt as wide as the Brooks wide. The NB also looked a bit wider when wearing one of each side by side but that may be because of the pastel vs dark color. The NB in light cashmere is a very pretty muted pink color. The Brooks black/pink online photos show it as a medium pink accent but it's more of a deep fuschia/magenta. There were three fit/feel differences that I noticed. In the NB, my heel slipped up with every step, even with a runners loop. I don't have heel slip in the Brooks. While the cushioning in stepping down on both heels is exceptional, it seemed where the Brooks was pure cushion, the NB had a bit of a cupping feel when bottoming out. It may be a good thing but I wondered if over long distance and wear that might become uncomfortable. Finally, the Brooks has a one piece sock-like smooth interior that makes wearing it barefoot, or with a toeless sock, just a bit more comfortable. If not for the heel slippage, it would have been tough to decide a clear winner. I may have gone for the NB for looks but ended up with the Brooks for the fit. I don't usually leave such lengthy reviews but when I searched for a comparison of these two shoes there weren't any so I thought this might help someone.;;Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2019;;5.0 out of 5 stars;;Brooks Glycerin 16 vs New Balance 1080v9;;LyricalPursuit;;/gp/customer-reviews/R64NTUZF3LFD8/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;I bought these for my wife at the recommendation of her doctor. Her podiatrist, treating her for plantar fasciitis saw them and agreed that they were the right shoe for her. She is on her feet all day and these have made a huge difference.;;Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2018;;5.0 out of 5 stars;;Great shoe for walking on concrete all day!;;KrabCat;;/gp/customer-reviews/R3UMMAOFOVFJRH/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;I’m upset It took me this long to buy Brooks! I have plantar fasciitis and ingrown toenails. Sneakers are made for the masses, even expensive orthotic inserts don’t come close to brooks sneakers. The toe box is wide and spacious. The fit is perfect although I sized 1/2 up. It feels like I’m walking in a supportive cloud. I took the style quiz and it really helped narrow down the best one for me. Buy them!;;Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2018;;5.0 out of 5 stars;;Best sneaker around;;tricia lasala;;/gp/customer-reviews/R77U7P3R21JQ3/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;I do like these shoes. They are comfortable, but I think there is slightly less cushioning than the Gylcerin 15. When I put on the 15's, it was as if they were made for me. I don't have quite the same comfort with the 16's. Please don't change styles so darn frequently! You can lose customers that way.;;Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2018;;4.0 out of 5 stars;;Good, but Glycerin 15 was better;;Army Mom 7;;/gp/customer-reviews/R1GEDA5R0UE19I/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;I originally purchased 2 of the Glycerin 15 Brooks sneaker, which were very comfortable for long walking; I have had 3 level disc fusion & find it very hard to find good comfortable sneakers. For some reason my 1 pair felt like they shrunk some how, so I ordered a half size bigger for my trip to Disney. I could not get the Glycerin 15, but was told the Glycerin 16 were very close....NOPE, not in the least! They were NOT as cushioned and actually gave me 2 blood blisters, one on each foot! I can not return them now because I worn them for 5 days in Disney, what a waste of $150..;;Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018;;2.0 out of 5 stars;;GLYCERIN 16 NOT COMFORTABLE!;;Danielle;;/gp/customer-reviews/R1580O0LJZ7MAT/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;Listed as one of the best cushioned running shoes. Light weight, flexible, well cushioned, these could be one of the most favorite. However, cannot beat Hoka clifton, Bondi and sketches Shape Ups. Glycerin 16 and New Balance 1080 have the feeling of walking on cloud, but rankes 2nd. The flexible sole makes me feel like start running. Love the feel! But, too tight around mid foot, and not for my high arch. Width D: good enough toe box and its depth. Toes can move around a little, but not deep. enough around mid section. Size: it is 1/2 size smaller, one size larger might still work. Material: thick and flexible, comfortable but not for long wear since it is doesn't seem to be breathable. Immediately wearing, it feels hot. The soft flexible material might be good for bunion, but the base of big toe gets pressure and hurts. I really like the thick cushioned sole that is flexible. Very similar feel to New Balance 1080v8.;;Reviewed in the United States on September 3, 2018;;2.0 out of 5 stars;;Could be one of the best if...;;Get the Best;;/gp/customer-reviews/R2T5F19G1IJVF7/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;These are great shoes but avoid buying from this seller ("Heart & Sole Sports"). These shoes were obviously worn/used due to the grey/black scuff marks on the soles. So incredibly insulting.;;Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2018;;1.0 out of 5 stars;;Avoid this seller;;sophist015;;/gp/customer-reviews/R20YP99604GVH8/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW;;;I love these. They're super comfortable. They tinkered with the design a few years ago so I switched from Glycerin to Ghost. I went back to these and for the most part I'm glad I did; however, I have fallen twice wearing these on wet surfaces. I'm not sure they have the best traction. Could be a coincidence but I took off a star. I don't know if anybody else has traction issues in these. I'd be interested to hear from other runners. I may have to wear different shoes this winter.;;Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018;;4.0 out of 5 stars;;Superb comfort but questionable traction.;;Margaret;;/gp/customer-reviews/RUGP0EALYK8PQ/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B07P3FYBBW

Shipping

This product includes free shipping to all US addresses.


Delivery

Orders placed now will arrive in 6-9 business days. Tracking information will be automatically provided as soon as your order ships.


View our full shipping policy here.

Returns

This product can be returned within 30 days of delivery for a full refund. Please visit our returns center to begin a return.

View our full returns policy here.

Top Amazon Reviews


5.0 out of 5 stars
By LyricalPursuit - Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2019
Brooks Glycerin 16 vs New Balance 1080v9
I was looking for high quality shoes that had a lot of cushion and room in the toe box. I would be using them primarily for walking around town and jogging on a treadmill. I have flat feel and pronate but didn't want a support shoe because the arch and rigidity is not comfortable for me. I prefer to use an arch support sock or arch wrap. I narrowed my choices to the New Balance 1080v9 (NB) vs Brooks Glycerin16 (Brooks) and tried them both. While looking at reviews, many people noted the Brooks ran narrow so I purchased that shoe in wide to accommodate the bunions I earned during my stiletto days. I found them to be very similar in fit. I wear 8.5 and they both ran true in length but the NB regular width felt as wide as the Brooks wide. The NB also looked a bit wider when wearing one of each side by side but that may be because of the pastel vs dark color. The NB in light cashmere is a very pretty muted pink color. The Brooks black/pink online photos show it as a medium pink accent but it's more of a deep fuschia/magenta. There were three fit/feel differences that I noticed. In the NB, my heel slipped up with every step, even with a runners loop. I don't have heel slip in the Brooks. While the cushioning in stepping down on both heels is exceptional, it seemed where the Brooks was pure cushion, the NB had a bit of a cupping feel when bottoming out. It may be a good thing but I wondered if over long distance and wear that might become uncomfortable. Finally, the Brooks has a one piece sock-like smooth interior that makes wearing it barefoot, or with a toeless sock, just a bit more comfortable. If not for the heel slippage, it would have been tough to decide a clear winner. I may have gone for the NB for looks but ended up with the Brooks for the fit. I don't usually leave such lengthy reviews but when I searched for a comparison of these two shoes there weren't any so I thought this might help someone.

5.0 out of 5 stars
By KrabCat - Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2018
Great shoe for walking on concrete all day!
I bought these for my wife at the recommendation of her doctor. Her podiatrist, treating her for plantar fasciitis saw them and agreed that they were the right shoe for her. She is on her feet all day and these have made a huge difference.

5.0 out of 5 stars
By tricia lasala - Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2018
Best sneaker around
I’m upset It took me this long to buy Brooks! I have plantar fasciitis and ingrown toenails. Sneakers are made for the masses, even expensive orthotic inserts don’t come close to brooks sneakers. The toe box is wide and spacious. The fit is perfect although I sized 1/2 up. It feels like I’m walking in a supportive cloud. I took the style quiz and it really helped narrow down the best one for me. Buy them!

4.0 out of 5 stars
By Army Mom 7 - Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2018
Good, but Glycerin 15 was better
I do like these shoes. They are comfortable, but I think there is slightly less cushioning than the Gylcerin 15. When I put on the 15's, it was as if they were made for me. I don't have quite the same comfort with the 16's. Please don't change styles so darn frequently! You can lose customers that way.

2.0 out of 5 stars
By Danielle - Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018
GLYCERIN 16 NOT COMFORTABLE!
I originally purchased 2 of the Glycerin 15 Brooks sneaker, which were very comfortable for long walking; I have had 3 level disc fusion & find it very hard to find good comfortable sneakers. For some reason my 1 pair felt like they shrunk some how, so I ordered a half size bigger for my trip to Disney. I could not get the Glycerin 15, but was told the Glycerin 16 were very close....NOPE, not in the least! They were NOT as cushioned and actually gave me 2 blood blisters, one on each foot! I can not return them now because I worn them for 5 days in Disney, what a waste of $150..

2.0 out of 5 stars
By Get the Best - Reviewed in the United States on September 3, 2018
Could be one of the best if...
Listed as one of the best cushioned running shoes. Light weight, flexible, well cushioned, these could be one of the most favorite. However, cannot beat Hoka clifton, Bondi and sketches Shape Ups. Glycerin 16 and New Balance 1080 have the feeling of walking on cloud, but rankes 2nd. The flexible sole makes me feel like start running. Love the feel! But, too tight around mid foot, and not for my high arch. Width D: good enough toe box and its depth. Toes can move around a little, but not deep. enough around mid section. Size: it is 1/2 size smaller, one size larger might still work. Material: thick and flexible, comfortable but not for long wear since it is doesn't seem to be breathable. Immediately wearing, it feels hot. The soft flexible material might be good for bunion, but the base of big toe gets pressure and hurts. I really like the thick cushioned sole that is flexible. Very similar feel to New Balance 1080v8.

1.0 out of 5 stars
By sophist015 - Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2018
Avoid this seller
These are great shoes but avoid buying from this seller ("Heart & Sole Sports"). These shoes were obviously worn/used due to the grey/black scuff marks on the soles. So incredibly insulting.

4.0 out of 5 stars
By Margaret - Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018
Superb comfort but questionable traction.
I love these. They're super comfortable. They tinkered with the design a few years ago so I switched from Glycerin to Ghost. I went back to these and for the most part I'm glad I did; however, I have fallen twice wearing these on wet surfaces. I'm not sure they have the best traction. Could be a coincidence but I took off a star. I don't know if anybody else has traction issues in these. I'd be interested to hear from other runners. I may have to wear different shoes this winter.

Recent Reviews


5.0 out of 5 stars
By LyricalPursuit - Reviewed in the United States on January 19, 2019
Brooks Glycerin 16 vs New Balance 1080v9
I was looking for high quality shoes that had a lot of cushion and room in the toe box. I would be using them primarily for walking around town and jogging on a treadmill. I have flat feel and pronate but didn't want a support shoe because the arch and rigidity is not comfortable for me. I prefer to use an arch support sock or arch wrap. I narrowed my choices to the New Balance 1080v9 (NB) vs Brooks Glycerin16 (Brooks) and tried them both. While looking at reviews, many people noted the Brooks ran narrow so I purchased that shoe in wide to accommodate the bunions I earned during my stiletto days. I found them to be very similar in fit. I wear 8.5 and they both ran true in length but the NB regular width felt as wide as the Brooks wide. The NB also looked a bit wider when wearing one of each side by side but that may be because of the pastel vs dark color. The NB in light cashmere is a very pretty muted pink color. The Brooks black/pink online photos show it as a medium pink accent but it's more of a deep fuschia/magenta. There were three fit/feel differences that I noticed. In the NB, my heel slipped up with every step, even with a runners loop. I don't have heel slip in the Brooks. While the cushioning in stepping down on both heels is exceptional, it seemed where the Brooks was pure cushion, the NB had a bit of a cupping feel when bottoming out. It may be a good thing but I wondered if over long distance and wear that might become uncomfortable. Finally, the Brooks has a one piece sock-like smooth interior that makes wearing it barefoot, or with a toeless sock, just a bit more comfortable. If not for the heel slippage, it would have been tough to decide a clear winner. I may have gone for the NB for looks but ended up with the Brooks for the fit. I don't usually leave such lengthy reviews but when I searched for a comparison of these two shoes there weren't any so I thought this might help someone.

5.0 out of 5 stars
By KrabCat - Reviewed in the United States on August 20, 2018
Great shoe for walking on concrete all day!
I bought these for my wife at the recommendation of her doctor. Her podiatrist, treating her for plantar fasciitis saw them and agreed that they were the right shoe for her. She is on her feet all day and these have made a huge difference.

5.0 out of 5 stars
By tricia lasala - Reviewed in the United States on September 30, 2018
Best sneaker around
I’m upset It took me this long to buy Brooks! I have plantar fasciitis and ingrown toenails. Sneakers are made for the masses, even expensive orthotic inserts don’t come close to brooks sneakers. The toe box is wide and spacious. The fit is perfect although I sized 1/2 up. It feels like I’m walking in a supportive cloud. I took the style quiz and it really helped narrow down the best one for me. Buy them!

4.0 out of 5 stars
By Army Mom 7 - Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2018
Good, but Glycerin 15 was better
I do like these shoes. They are comfortable, but I think there is slightly less cushioning than the Gylcerin 15. When I put on the 15's, it was as if they were made for me. I don't have quite the same comfort with the 16's. Please don't change styles so darn frequently! You can lose customers that way.

2.0 out of 5 stars
By Danielle - Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018
GLYCERIN 16 NOT COMFORTABLE!
I originally purchased 2 of the Glycerin 15 Brooks sneaker, which were very comfortable for long walking; I have had 3 level disc fusion & find it very hard to find good comfortable sneakers. For some reason my 1 pair felt like they shrunk some how, so I ordered a half size bigger for my trip to Disney. I could not get the Glycerin 15, but was told the Glycerin 16 were very close....NOPE, not in the least! They were NOT as cushioned and actually gave me 2 blood blisters, one on each foot! I can not return them now because I worn them for 5 days in Disney, what a waste of $150..

2.0 out of 5 stars
By Get the Best - Reviewed in the United States on September 3, 2018
Could be one of the best if...
Listed as one of the best cushioned running shoes. Light weight, flexible, well cushioned, these could be one of the most favorite. However, cannot beat Hoka clifton, Bondi and sketches Shape Ups. Glycerin 16 and New Balance 1080 have the feeling of walking on cloud, but rankes 2nd. The flexible sole makes me feel like start running. Love the feel! But, too tight around mid foot, and not for my high arch. Width D: good enough toe box and its depth. Toes can move around a little, but not deep. enough around mid section. Size: it is 1/2 size smaller, one size larger might still work. Material: thick and flexible, comfortable but not for long wear since it is doesn't seem to be breathable. Immediately wearing, it feels hot. The soft flexible material might be good for bunion, but the base of big toe gets pressure and hurts. I really like the thick cushioned sole that is flexible. Very similar feel to New Balance 1080v8.

1.0 out of 5 stars
By sophist015 - Reviewed in the United States on December 6, 2018
Avoid this seller
These are great shoes but avoid buying from this seller ("Heart & Sole Sports"). These shoes were obviously worn/used due to the grey/black scuff marks on the soles. So incredibly insulting.

4.0 out of 5 stars
By Margaret - Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2018
Superb comfort but questionable traction.
I love these. They're super comfortable. They tinkered with the design a few years ago so I switched from Glycerin to Ghost. I went back to these and for the most part I'm glad I did; however, I have fallen twice wearing these on wet surfaces. I'm not sure they have the best traction. Could be a coincidence but I took off a star. I don't know if anybody else has traction issues in these. I'd be interested to hear from other runners. I may have to wear different shoes this winter.